John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in news:smed1m$qad$1@dont- email.me:> On 11/9/2021 3:18 AM, Phil Allison wrote: >> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote: >> ============================== >>>> Flyshit pooped itself: >>>> ======================== >>>>> >>>>> So, it IS NOT zero >>>>> >>>> >>>> ** But your fucking IQ certainly is. >>>> >>>> .... Phil >>> >>> You get a big plus +100 for that low minus 100, right on the mark >>> scoring job! It could even be less than zero! >>> >> >> ** Negative IQ - that is quite a concept. >> >> Means all thoughts and conclusions are wrong. >> Worse than pure guessing. >> >> >> ..... Phil >> > > Worse than that. His negative IQ is vacuuming up other people's IQ. > Don't get too close. > >The entire Trump cult is trying their hardest to fuck up the minds of as many as they can. It is really sad that they believed his fucktarded deadly lies to start with. He has damaged the nation in so many ways.
Legal definitions of homicide in the US and applicability to the accidental shooting on the 'Rust' movie set
Started by ●November 5, 2021
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:b8ff9d7f-4a4f-4a32- 9723-849fd758d100n@googlegroups.com:> John S wrote: > ============== > > >> > ** Negative IQ - that is quite a concept. >> > >> > Means all thoughts and conclusions are wrong. >> > Worse than pure guessing. >> > >> > >> Worse than that. His negative IQ is vacuuming up other people's IQ. >> Don't get too close. > > ** Yep - stupidity can be infectious. > > Wonder if they will ever come up with a vaccine against it ?? > > > .... Phil >They won't eat it, they hate everything... (1000s dies)... Hey Mikey! They like it! I wonder how many will get that reference.
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
On 11/6/2021 5:09 PM, Phil Allison wrote:> Flyshit is So Fucking Stupid > ====================== >>>> Go and f your mother - you ridiculous child. >>>> ================================= >> >>> >>> Along with main character acting, that would be a totally impossible task. >> >> Baldwin knowingly accepted these responsibilities > > ** And can legally deal with them by delegation. > >>> Others shared that job. > >> There may be others (and probably are) that share Baldwin's negligence - that is for the prosecutors to decide, not you. > > ** None of them criminal - you lying ass. >When I was 6 years old my father gave me a .410 shotgun for Christmas. He did not teach me how to hit my target (birds flying, rabbits running, etc). But he did repeatedly teach me how to handle a gun safely: 1. Make it a habit to check the gun to see if it is loaded each and every time I pick it up to go hunting. He once handed me my gun when we were getting ready to go hunting. I did not check the gun to see it was loaded. Before I took two steps he stopped me and told me I had broken a serious safety rule by not checking it. He said it does not matter how I came into possession of the gun, always check it. 2. Do not load the gun until we get to the hunting area. Do not leave the hunting area with a loaded gun. 3. Never point a gun, either loaded or unloaded, at another person. Never point a gun at an animal or object unless I intend to shoot it. There were other rules, but these were the minimums. He watched me like a hawk for a season or two until he became satisfied with my attention to safety. (But he never stopped watching.) I am certainly not qualified to judge who was responsible for the movie shooting. I just know that had a gun been handed to me on a movie set, I would have instinctively checked to see if it was loaded with the proper ammo.
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
On 11/9/2021 12:23 PM, Phil Allison wrote:> John S wrote: > ============== > > >>> ** Negative IQ - that is quite a concept. >>> >>> Means all thoughts and conclusions are wrong. >>> Worse than pure guessing. >>> >>> >> Worse than that. His negative IQ is vacuuming up other people's IQ. >> Don't get too close. > > ** Yep - stupidity can be infectious. > > Wonder if they will ever come up with a vaccine against it ?? > > > .... Phil >Not exactly a vaccine but they already have condoms.
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
John S wrote: ===========> > > I am certainly not qualified to judge who was responsible for the movie > shooting. I just know that had a gun been handed to me on a movie set, I > would have instinctively checked to see if it was loaded with the proper > ammo. >** A task the New Mexico DA said she would have likely failed at - though aware of their being a rogue round in the gun. This IS a kinda crucial fact. One that must be ignored, according to you. ...... Phil
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
On 11/9/2021 12:49 PM, Phil Allison wrote:> John S wrote: > =========== >> >> >> I am certainly not qualified to judge who was responsible for the movie >> shooting. I just know that had a gun been handed to me on a movie set, I >> would have instinctively checked to see if it was loaded with the proper >> ammo. >> > > ** A task the New Mexico DA said she would have likely failed at - though aware of their being a rogue round in the gun. > This IS a kinda crucial fact. > > One that must be ignored, according to you. > > > ...... Phil >In what way have I indicated to ignore some fact? You're saying that the New Mexico DA was aware of a rogue round in the gun?
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
John Simpleton wrote: =================>> > >> I am certainly not qualified to judge who was responsible for the movie > >> shooting. I just know that had a gun been handed to me on a movie set, I > >> would have instinctively checked to see if it was loaded with the proper > >> ammo. > >> > > > > ** A task the New Mexico DA said she would have likely failed at - though aware of their being a rogue round in the gun. > > This IS a kinda crucial fact. > > > > One that must be ignored, according to you. > > > > > In what way have I indicated to ignore some fact?** That the live round was detectable by eye or weight.> You're saying that the New Mexico DA was aware of a rogue round in the gun?** We all are - fuckwit. ..... Phil
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:604ff34e-638b-402d- 9b09-aa6196767615n@googlegroups.com:> ** That the live round was detectable by eye or weight. >They are 100% discernable from industry (Hollywood) dummy rounds. Read slowly... "DUMMY" rounds have projectiles in place like normal rounds. ALL "DUMMY" rounds have BBs in place of the powder and are easily identifiable audibly. ALL "DUMMY" rounds have struck primers in their asses, and are therefore easily identifiable visually as well. ALL "DUMMY" round "loaders" know these facts and should NEVER mis- load a film prop weapon... ever. Anything else is tantamount to negligence at the job and if loss of life results from incomplete compliance with the details and duties of the job, that is chargeable as a crime.
Reply by ●November 9, 20212021-11-09
Decaying Zombie: ===============> > > ** That the live round was detectable by eye or weight. > > > They are 100% discernable from industry (Hollywood) dummy rounds. >** You don't know that.> > "DUMMY" rounds have projectiles in place like normal rounds. > > ALL "DUMMY" rounds have BBs in place of the powder** Bullshit. Many are quite identical. Google the term. Pics of the actual rounds are on line. The lady DA was not lying. ..... Phil
Reply by ●November 10, 20212021-11-10
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:5fe69faf-307b-4016- 89ba-18529b9fe7d0n@googlegroups.com:> Decaying Zombie: > =============== >> >> > ** That the live round was detectable by eye or weight. >> > >> They are 100% discernable from industry (Hollywood) dummy rounds. >> > > ** You don't know that.I do know that. A real bullet and ANY "DUMMY" round that Hollywood approves or uses incorporates elements which allow one to identify it as a dummy. So, I *DO* know that.>> "DUMMY" rounds have projectiles in place like normal rounds. >> >> ALL "DUMMY" rounds have BBs in place of the powder > > ** Bullshit.What is bullshit, jackass? That they have the exact projectiles in them, or that they replace the powder with BBs? You only got the jackass moniker because of your very first line in your response.> Many are quite identical.They are meant to look EXACTLY identical from some perspectives. Look at the ass of a center fire dummy and you will find the primer has already been struck. Do you know what that means, gun boy?> Google the term.I do not need to.> Pics of the actual rounds are on line.Not any that are used in US film and television production sets. NO actual rounds are supposed to be on any set period. ONLY dummy rounds. So pictures of dummy rounds shot front view would look EXACTLY like a live round, just as you pathetically bark out, however, look at the ass of the bullet, and you will find that the primer has already been struck. Shake it... hear them BBs? Try to keep up now... That means its a dummy round. No powder in a dummy round, just BBs and no live primer in a dummy round. And a real round will not ever have the projectile still in place and the primer struck at the same time. Pretty simple logic. Easy to ID for anyone on the set. They ALL have the identifiying elements. Nice try though. You get an F for eFfort.
