I have discovered definitive proof that talking on a cell phone use causes cancer. It's not the usual cancer of the brain, or central nervous system. It's cancer of the tongue. https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=6 Notice the steady increase in new cases of tongue cancer since 1990, and the corresponding increase in cell phone use over the same time period: http://historyofthecellulartelephone.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/9/5/49959297/8533326_orig.png The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively proving that yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Cell phone use causes tongue cancer
Started by ●July 15, 2018
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On 07/15/2018 11:48 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:> I have discovered definitive proof that talking on a cell > phone use causes cancer. It's not the usual cancer of the > brain, or central nervous system. It's cancer of the tongue. > > https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=6 > > Notice the steady increase in new cases of tongue cancer > since 1990, and the corresponding increase in cell phone use > over the same time period: > > http://historyofthecellulartelephone.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/9/5/49959297/8533326_orig.png > > The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively > proving that yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer. >Only old ppl use cell phones for actual voice calls nowadays...
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 08:48:45 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:>I have discovered definitive proof that talking on a cell >phone use causes cancer. It's not the usual cancer of the >brain, or central nervous system. It's cancer of the tongue. > >https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=6 > >Notice the steady increase in new cases of tongue cancer >since 1990, and the corresponding increase in cell phone use >over the same time period: > >http://historyofthecellulartelephone.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/9/5/49959297/8533326_orig.png > >The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively >proving that yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer."Smart" phones cause "unsmart" ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions, by understanding what nature is hiding. "It is not in doing what you like, but in liking what you do that is the secret of happiness." -James Barrie
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
søndag den 15. juli 2018 kl. 17.48.38 UTC+2 skrev Jeff Liebermann:> I have discovered definitive proof that talking on a cell > phone use causes cancer. It's not the usual cancer of the > brain, or central nervous system. It's cancer of the tongue. > > https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=6 > > Notice the steady increase in new cases of tongue cancer > since 1990, and the corresponding increase in cell phone use > over the same time period: > > http://historyofthecellulartelephone.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/9/5/49959297/8533326_orig.png > > The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively > proving that yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer. >http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
No, it's that damn CO2 again : https://www.google.com/search?q=co2+in+air+graph+by+year&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=tEK2chAN1PzHwM%253A%252CV-R_e2MINN1-SM%252C_&usg=__S1gXQcJxwhZzFN9BCbWcMB3IM6E%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiB49HJzqHcAhVimK0KHeVrDV4Q9QEINTAD#imgrc=tEK2chAN1PzHwM:
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT), jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:>No, it's that damn CO2 again : > >https://www.google.com/search?q=co2+in+air+graph+by+year&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=tEK2chAN1PzHwM%253A%252CV-R_e2MINN1-SM%252C_&usg=__S1gXQcJxwhZzFN9BCbWcMB3IM6E%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiB49HJzqHcAhVimK0KHeVrDV4Q9QEINTAD#imgrc=tEK2chAN1PzHwM:What's interesting about the CO2 graphs is the sawtooth waveform, expecially the down slopes. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 08:48:45 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:> The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively proving that > yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer.This is obviously going to hit women disproportionately more than men. -- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 08:59:24 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:> "Smart" phones cause "unsmart" ;-)All products with "smart" as part of the name are only smart for those who are selling them. -- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 18:54:02 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote:>On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 08:59:24 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > >> "Smart" phones cause "unsmart" ;-) > >All products with "smart" as part of the name are only smart for those >who are selling them.My father once warned me that products with superlatives such as super, amazing, magic, miracle, plus, smart, advanced, ultra, jumbo, and such usually don't meet up to the expectations implied by the name. After many years of being disappointed by such products, I've concluded that he was correct. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Reply by ●July 15, 20182018-07-15
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 09:03:31 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:>s�ndag den 15. juli 2018 kl. 17.48.38 UTC+2 skrev Jeff Liebermann: >> I have discovered definitive proof that talking on a cell >> phone use causes cancer. It's not the usual cancer of the >> brain, or central nervous system. It's cancer of the tongue. >> >> https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=6 >> >> Notice the steady increase in new cases of tongue cancer >> since 1990, and the corresponding increase in cell phone use >> over the same time period: >> >> http://historyofthecellulartelephone.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/9/5/49959297/8533326_orig.png >> >> The two graphs correlate quite nicely, thus conclusively >> proving that yacking on a cell phone causes tongue cancer.>http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlationsYep. Corrleation does not imply causation. I had decided that it was time to download an updated graph of the incidence of brain and CNS cancers from the SEER database. I'm possibly giving yet another talk on the topic of cell phones and brain cancer in a month or three and will need it. As usual, the incidence rate of new braind and CNS cancers are still decreasing. Nothing new here: <https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=1&year=201801&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=76> The graph of age versus brain cancer incidence was also unchanged: <https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php?run=runit&output=1&data=1&statistic=3&year=201804&race=1&sex=1&age=1&series=cancer&cancer=76> So, I was wondering if any of the cancer sites listed were increasing. I randomly clicked around the list of cancer sites. Most were stable or decreasing. Then I found cancer of the tongue, which was increasing. You can guess the rest. Also, I was also inspired by this article from The Guardian: "The inconvenient truth about cancer and mobile phones" https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/14/mobile-phones-cancer-inconvenient-truths ...there is "clear evidence" that radiation from mobile phones causes cancer, specifically, a heart tissue cancer in rats that is too rare to be explained as random occurrence. I presume that if fewer rats contracted this rare cancer, it would be even more evident that it was caused by cell phone emissions. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
