On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us:> >And I have to wrap yours.Total horseshit. You are apparently clueless about word definitions as well. No surprise from a total retard and jackass like you.> Google's interface isn't ideal,Google's alt group access designers should be taken to a firing squad for their utter stupidity. It is on par with yours.> but it's cheap and convenient.It is free, you retarded fuck.> Forte was cheap enough, but not all that convenient.Yeah, and a retarded, lazy, masturbating bastard like you needs a free hand.
Twisted Pair
Started by ●December 8, 2013
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 20:35:37 UTC+11, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno w= rote:> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman=20 > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us<snip - not mine, but our Decadent Linux User has snipped a lot of context,= and failed to mark the snip. For anybody with a taste for flame wars, he's= been trying to convince us that he's been posting since around 1995, witho= ut telling us who he was posting as back then. I had a browse though Decemb= er 1996 earlier today, and couldn't come up with any likely candidates.>> >Sure. The most likely hypothesis is that you weren't even born back then=.=20> >=20 > That is why folks here place ZERO credence in ANY of your pathetic atte=mpts at making hypotheses.=20 That does sound like the sort of output you'd expect from a 12-year-old.=20 =20> Your logic is planted firmly at nil.Interesting use of the word "logic" - consistent with the kind of mistake a= 12-year-old would make. --=20 Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:53:11 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us:>On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 20:35:37 UTC+11, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman >> <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us > ><snip - not mine, but our Decadent Linux User has snipped a lot > of context, and failed to mark the snip.Whoopie doo, you retarded piece of shit. LEARN how to make a proper post in Usenet or FUCK OFFR AND DIE, JACKASS!> For anybody with a taste for flame wars, he's been trying to convince usMultiple personality disorder much, jackass?> that he's been posting since around 1995,I am not "trying to convince anyone of anything, you retarded piece of shit. Everyone in the group, short of total dumbfucks like you, knows exactly "who I am".> without telling us who he wasWaaaah... pussy can't do basic Usenet research, so he can "make a netkkkop complaint". You are transparent, SloTard.> posting as back then. I had a browse though December 1996 earlier > today, and couldn't come up with any likely candidates.>Probably due to your inane inability to do damn near anything. You probably have someone wipe your ass for you. Are you also morbidly obese? I'd bet yes.> "Without telling us"?You are an idiot SloTard. If you haven't noticed, you have never been a part of the "us" making up this group. You have ALWAYS been a parasite, and right now, you are pretty fucking full of your retarded self. But still no part of ANY "US" other than your multiple personality disorder, perhaps. Nice long line AGAIN there too, dumbfucktard.>> >Sure. The most likely hypothesis is that you weren't even born back then. >> > >> That is why folks here place ZERO credence in ANY of your pathetic attempts at making hypotheses. > >That does sound like the sort of output you'd expect from a 12-year-old.You are so fucking stupid, you have no clue what kids these days are like. You are a pathetic little worm, and nothing more. Worm off, back into your corner where there are no 555 timer chips. Go display your mental masturbation in some lame social group, dipshit. You're a fucking joke.>> Your logic is planted firmly at nil. > >Interesting use of the word "logic" - consistent with the kind of mistake a 12-year-old would make.You ain't real bright, boy.
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 00:34:27 UTC+11, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno = wrote:> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:53:11 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us: > >On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 20:35:37 UTC+11, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno=wrote:> >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman =20 > >> <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us=20<snip> =20> > For anybody with a taste for flame wars, he's been trying to convince u=s that he's been posting here since around 1995,> =20 > I am not "trying to convince anyone of anything, you retarded piece of =shit. Everyone in the group, short of total dumbfucks like you, knows exac= tly "who I am". But you decline to tell us what pseudonym or pseudonyms you were posting un= der back then. It certainly looks as if you are telling a story you can't substantiate, pr= obably because it isn't true. With a name - any name - it would be trivial = to search the Google Groups archive. My stuff is easy to identify - hardly = anybody else uses the word "albeit" and I don't use it all that often. Sea= rching s.e.d. on "albeit" from the beginning of 1994 to the end of 1996 fou= nd 14 instances - the fifth one picked a post that I'd made. Searching on "dumbfuck" or "dumbfucks" on s.e.d. from the beginning of 1994= to the end of 1996 produced nothing. "Idiot" picked up 115 instances - altavoz@azstarnet.com does seem to have s= hared your style. His first post seems to be on the 20th June 1996. If you = were posting earlier it would have presumably been under a different pseudo= nym. Searching on "idiot" before the beginning of June 1996 doesn't produce anyt= hing like as many hits, and nobody that sounds like you. --=20 Bill Sloman, Sydney <snip>
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
In article <d536b4ed-ed5b-4c07-b30e-e3e89f9676ff@googlegroups.com>, bill.sloman@gmail.com says...> > On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 10:09:56 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. wrote: > > In article <95d1f881-003d-4da4-81e6-f08441719230@googlegroups.com>, > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says... > > > On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 09:22:02 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. wrote: > > > > In article <aegaa9ds1ar52vjv3v0fakrjbi5qbg93ul@4ax.com>, DLU1 > > > > @DecadentLinuxUser.org says.. > > > > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:54:07 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman > > > > > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us: > > > > > > > > > > >I know that it's dorkish to intrude facts into a pissing contest, but someone who posts under a constantly changing alias is at a substantial disadvantage when he wants to claim to have been here for a long time. We did have our resident idiots early on, but my feeling is that you weren't one of them. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Probably here since late '94 or '95 on. You lose. > > Not until Decadent Linux User spells out which alias he was using back then - so we can get his current information provider to throw him off the web for his past misdeeds. > > > > > SLow-Man is just a proxy! > > > > > > It's not a proxy I use. But then I do know how my name is spelled on my birth certificate and my passport, and in my publications in the peer-reviewed literature. > > > > > > The Decadent Linux User and Maynard A. Philbrook Jnr. may have to work harder at keeping their identities organised. > > > > That went over your head, nothing new :) > > But you can't explain what it was that you think I missed - or may have chosen to ignore. Like the Decadent Linux User - who may be you for all we know - you want to claim a victory without providing any evidence to support your claim.Your response indicates you have that feeling of loosing the battle of wits? It's a good thing I don't like battling with an unarmed man, Slow- Man.. Jamie
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
In article <35oda9llspshpn4ol1omaagt9tsif0npuo@4ax.com>, DLU1 @DecadentLinuxUser.org says...> > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us: > > > > >And I have to wrap yours. > > Total horseshit. > > You are apparently clueless about word definitions as well. > > No surprise from a total retard and jackass like you. > > > Google's interface isn't ideal, > > Google's alt group access designers should be taken to a firing squad > for their utter stupidity. It is on par with yours. > > > but it's cheap and convenient. > > It is free, you retarded fuck. > > > Forte was cheap enough, but not all that convenient. > > Yeah, and a retarded, lazy, masturbating bastard like you needs a free > hand.AT his age, that would be a complement. Jamie
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 10:39:08 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. w= rote:> In article <d536b4ed-ed5b-4c07-b30e-e3e89f9676ff@googlegroups.com>, =20 > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...=20 > > On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 10:09:56 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. =wrote:=20> > > In article <95d1f881-003d-4da4-81e6-f08441719230@googlegroups.com>, ==20> > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...=20 > > > > On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 09:22:02 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook =Jr. wrote:> > > > > In article <aegaa9ds1ar52vjv3v0fakrjbi5qbg93ul@4ax.com>, DLU1 > > > > > @DecadentLinuxUser.org says.. =20 > > > > > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:54:07 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman =20 > > > > > > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us: =20 > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > >I know that it's dorkish to intrude facts into a pissing conte=st, but someone who posts under a constantly changing alias is at a substan= tial disadvantage when he wants to claim to have been here for a long time.= We did have our resident idiots early on, but my feeling is that you weren= 't one of them. =20> > > > =20 > > > > <snip>=20 > > > > =20 > > > > > > Probably here since late '94 or '95 on. You lose. =20 > > =20 > > Not until Decadent Linux User spells out which alias he was using back =then - so we can get his current information provider to throw him off the = web for his past misdeeds.> > =20 > > > > > SLow-Man is just a proxy! =20 > > > > =20 > > > > It's not a proxy I use. But then I do know how my name is spelled o=n my birth certificate and my passport, and in my publications in the peer-= reviewed literature. =20> > > >=20 > > > > The Decadent Linux User and Maynard A. Philbrook Jnr. may have to w=ork harder at keeping their identities organised.=20> > > =20 > > > That went over your head, nothing new :)=20 > >=20 > > But you can't explain what it was that you think I missed - or may have=chosen to ignore. Like the Decadent Linux User - who may be you for all we= know - you want to claim a victory without providing any evidence to suppo= rt your claim. =20>=20 > Your response indicates you have that feeling of loosing the battle of w=its? There's no battle going on here. Your pathetic reaction merely indicates t= hat you are bluffing, and lack the wit to know when to fold. =20> It's a good thing I don't like battling with an unarmed man, Slow-Man..I don't have any such inhibitions. I'm happy to lay out the bait that the h= alf-witted can rise to, and reel them in after they've taken the hook. --=20 Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 10:42:39 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. w= rote:> In article <35oda9llspshpn4ol1omaagt9tsif0npuo@4ax.com>, DLU1=20 > @DecadentLinuxUser.org says... > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman=20 > > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us:=20 > > >=20 > > >And I have to wrap yours.=20 > > =20 > > Total horseshit.=20 > >=20 > > You are apparently clueless about word definitions as well. > >=20 > > No surprise from a total retard and jackass like you.=20 > > =20 > > > Google's interface isn't ideal,=20 > >=20 > > Google's alt group access designers should be taken to a firing squad=for their utter stupidity. It is on par with yours. They are probably cleverer, and certainly much younger. Google could be ver= y selective about the people they hired. The sad thing about Google Groups = is that it has probably been deliberately messed up in a way that makes it = more difficult and tedious for people to post well-formatted responses=20 =20> > > but it's cheap and convenient.=20 > >=20 > > It is free, you retarded fuck.That's as cheap as cheap gets. I've still got to pay a service provider in = order to be able to get at it. =20> > > Forte was cheap enough, but not all that convenient. > >=20 > > Yeah, and a retarded, lazy, masturbating bastard like you needs a fre=e hand.> =20 > At his age, that would be a complement.Jamie probably meant "compliment". In fact my parents were married when I w= as born, and had been married for some nine months and ten days at the time= , my subsequent progression through the education system was - if anything = - faster than average, and I'm not so much lazy as depressed. My sex life i= s my own business, though my wife does have a contractual interest.=20 --=20 Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
In article <06c63953-1cfd-4cc5-87d7-4db8581f53f1@googlegroups.com>, bill.sloman@gmail.com says...> > On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 10:42:39 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. wrote: > > In article <35oda9llspshpn4ol1omaagt9tsif0npuo@4ax.com>, DLU1 > > @DecadentLinuxUser.org says... > > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:00:42 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman > > > <bill.sloman@gmail.com> Gave us: > > > > > > > >And I have to wrap yours. > > > > > > Total horseshit. > > > > > > You are apparently clueless about word definitions as well. > > > > > > No surprise from a total retard and jackass like you. > > > > > > > Google's interface isn't ideal, > > > > > > Google's alt group access designers should be taken to a firing squad for their utter stupidity. It is on par with yours. > > They are probably cleverer, and certainly much younger. Google could be very selective about the people they hired. The sad thing about Google Groups is that it has probably been deliberately messed up in a way that makes it more difficult and tedious for people to post well-formatted responses > > > > > but it's cheap and convenient. > > > > > > It is free, you retarded fuck. > > That's as cheap as cheap gets. I've still got to pay a service provider in order to be able to get at it. > > > > > Forte was cheap enough, but not all that convenient. > > > > > > Yeah, and a retarded, lazy, masturbating bastard like you needs a free hand. > > > > At his age, that would be a complement. > > Jamie probably meant "compliment". In fact my parents were married when I was born, and had been married for some nine months and ten days at the time, my subsequent progression through the education system was - if anything - faster than average, and I'm not so much lazy as depressed.My sex life is my own business, though my wife does have a contractual interest. You mean a vague memory of it? Jamie
Reply by ●December 10, 20132013-12-10
