John S wrote:
> 
> On 12/18/2013 7:23 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 December 2013 09:22:53 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> >> In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>,
> 
> Carry on Guys, I'm gonna get a pizza.


   Bring back some troll chow for Bill & Maynard.


-- 
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.

On 12/19/2013 5:03 PM, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. wrote:
> In article <l8v9us$kfh$1@dont-email.me>, Sophi.2@invalid.org says...
>>
>> On 12/18/2013 7:23 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 19 December 2013 09:22:53 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
>>>> In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> Carry on Guys, I'm gonna get a pizza.
>
> No problem. I like meat lovers, let me know when it arrives!
>
> Jamie
>

I have no meat to offer. Check with someone else.

In article <l8v9us$kfh$1@dont-email.me>, Sophi.2@invalid.org says...
> 
> On 12/18/2013 7:23 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 December 2013 09:22:53 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> >> In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>,
> 
> Carry on Guys, I'm gonna get a pizza.

No problem. I like meat lovers, let me know when it arrives!

Jamie

On 12/18/2013 7:23 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 December 2013 09:22:53 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
>> In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>,

Carry on Guys, I'm gonna get a pizza.

On Thursday, 19 December 2013 09:22:53 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>, 
> bill.sloman@gmail.com says...  
> > On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 11:26:15 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote: 
> > > In article <b77a053f-27c2-4682-926c-12632144cf97@googlegroups.com>, 
> > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...  
> > > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:26:27 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > > > > In article <423b9565-38e0-4cec-927-d3471a0fa084@googlegroups.com>,    
> > > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...    
> > > > > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:40:45 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:  
> > > > > > > In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>,   
> > > > > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says.. 
> >  
> > <snip>  
> > 
> > > > > You are absolutely hopeless.. I don't think you move to AU on your own,  they must of kidded out!  
> > > >  
> > > > Interesting sentence. My wife and I moved back to Australia of our own volition. 
> > > 
> > > > I wonder what Jamie had in mind when he typed "kidded out"? I could guess, but why bother? His brain clearly wasn't working as well as it usually does when he posted that message, and it never works particularly well.  
> > >  
> > > You're a psychopathic loony, deprived of any common sense.. 
> > 
> > Congratulations. You've spelled "psychopathic" right. You clearly don't know what the word means - psychopaths are notoriously good at manipulating other people, which takes "common sense". 
> 
> No, I got it exactly correct.  You're so demented that you can't see it.

That's a hypothesis, but one that falls a long way short of being convincing.
  
>  Years of socialist conditioning to make you subservient tends to weaken 
the mind.

I've certainly lived in countries that Americans call "socialist" - the UK and the Netherlands - for about thirty years.

In the UK the Murdoch press was clearly trying to weaken the minds of the average reader, but in a way that would make them less susceptible to socialism. I rarely read their output.

The stuff I did read was strong on reasoned argument, which isn't exactly one of your skills. Most of our right wing nitwits can't do it either.

James Arthur can produce what looks like reasoned argument, but only when the apparently logical conclusion suits his point of view - and he does have a habit of missing equally persuasive lines of reasoning that lead to less palatable conclusions.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

In article <0283c13e-d869-4339-b661-ce71163a4a95@googlegroups.com>, 
bill.sloman@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 11:26:15 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > In article <b77a053f-27c2-4682-926c-12632144cf97@googlegroups.com>, 
> > bill.sloman@gmail.com says... 
> > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:26:27 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > > > In article <423b9565-38e0-4cec-8927-d3471a0fa084@googlegroups.com>,   
> > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...   
> > > > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:40:45 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote: 
> > > > > > In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>,   
> > > > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says..
> 
> <snip>  
> 
> > > > You are absolutely hopeless.. I don't think you move to AU on your own,  they must of kidded out! 
> > >  
> > > Interesting sentence. My wife and I moved back to Australia of our own volition.
> > 
> > > I wonder what Jamie had in mind when he typed "kidded out"? I could guess, but why bother? His brain clearly wasn't working as well as it usually does when he posted that message, and it never works particularly well.  
> > 
> > You're a psychopathic loony, deprived of any common sense..
> 
> Congratulations. You've spelled "psychopathic" right. You clearly don't know what the word means - psychopaths are notoriously good at manipulating other people, which takes "common sense".

No, I got it exactly correct.  You're so demented that you can't see it.

 Years of socialist conditioning to make you subservient tends to weaken 
the mind.

Jamie

On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 11:26:15 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> In article <b77a053f-27c2-4682-926c-12632144cf97@googlegroups.com>, 
> bill.sloman@gmail.com says... 
> > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:26:27 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > > In article <423b9565-38e0-4cec-8927-d3471a0fa084@googlegroups.com>,   
> > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...   
> > > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:40:45 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote: 
> > > > > In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>,   
> > > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says..

<snip>  

> > > You are absolutely hopeless.. I don't think you move to AU on your own,  they must of kidded out! 
> >  
> > Interesting sentence. My wife and I moved back to Australia of our own volition.
> 
> > I wonder what Jamie had in mind when he typed "kidded out"? I could guess, but why bother? His brain clearly wasn't working as well as it usually does when he posted that message, and it never works particularly well.  
> 
> You're a psychopathic loony, deprived of any common sense..

Congratulations. You've spelled "psychopathic" right. You clearly don't know what the word means - psychopaths are notoriously good at manipulating other people, which takes "common sense".
 
>  I bet you're a big hit at the soup kitchen!

I might be - if I ever went near one. It seems unlikely. 

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

In article <b77a053f-27c2-4682-926c-12632144cf97@googlegroups.com>, 
bill.sloman@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:26:27 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > In article <423b9565-38e0-4cec-8927-d3471a0fa084@googlegroups.com>,  
> > bill.sloman@gmail.com says...  
> > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:40:45 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wrote:
> > > > In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>,  
> > > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says.. 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Point proven.  You really are a loser, Sloman.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/taunt
> > > > >  
> > > > > ":  to reproach or challenge in a mocking or insulting manner :  jeer at " 
> > > > >  
> > > > > I'm not challenging you - I wouldn't waste my time - nor reproaching you - stupidity isn't something you've got any choice about.  You may feel it to be mocking you,and you may experience it as insulting, but I'd not added anything to the basic factual observation that you foolishly misuse words you don't properly understand. "Flatlined" originally, and here "proven". 
> > > > > 
> > > > > You idea of "what I really am" is just one more example of the inadequacy of your perceptions. 
> > > >   
> > > >  You really are a party animal! The one they kidded out side, that is! 
> > > > 
> > > >  I am shocked that you have enough energy in that thing called a head,  sitting on your shoulders, to fire the neurons for proper signaling to your hands for keyboard activity. 
> > >  
> > > So am I. I suppose it's curiosity about how krw's mind works - or maybe just his vocabulary. You are pretty hopeless, but at least you make new mistakes from time to time. krw could be an automaton, but why would anybody program a mechanism to work that badly? 
> > 
> > You are absolutely hopeless.. I don't think you move to AU on your own, 
> they must of kidded out!
> 
> Interesting sentence. My wife and I moved back to Australia of our own volition.
> I wonder what Jamie had in mind when he typed "kidded out"? I could guess, but why bother? His brain clearly wasn't working as well as it usually does when he posted that message, and it never works particularly well.

You're a psychopathic loony, deprived of any common sense..

 I bet you're a big hit at the soup kitchen!

Jamie

On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:26:27 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.  wro=
te:
> In article <423b9565-38e0-4cec-8927-d3471a0fa084@googlegroups.com>, =20
> bill.sloman@gmail.com says... =20
> > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:40:45 UTC+11, Maynard A. Philbrook Jr. =
 wrote:
> > > In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>, =
=20
> > > bill.sloman@gmail.com says..=20
> > > > >
> > > > > Point proven.  You really are a loser, Sloman. =20
> > > >=20
> > > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/taunt
> > > > =20
> > > > ":  to reproach or challenge in a mocking or insulting manner :  je=
er at "=20
> > > > =20
> > > > I'm not challenging you - I wouldn't waste my time - nor reproachin=
g you - stupidity isn't something you've got any choice about.  You may fee=
l it to be mocking you,and you may experience it as insulting, but I'd not =
added anything to the basic factual observation that you foolishly misuse w=
ords you don't properly understand. "Flatlined" originally, and here "prove=
n".=20
> > > >=20
> > > > You idea of "what I really am" is just one more example of the inad=
equacy of your perceptions.=20
> > >  =20
> > >  You really are a party animal! The one they kidded out side, that is=
!=20
> > >=20
> > >  I am shocked that you have enough energy in that thing called a head=
,  sitting on your shoulders, to fire the neurons for proper signaling to y=
our hands for keyboard activity.=20
> > =20
> > So am I. I suppose it's curiosity about how krw's mind works - or maybe=
 just his vocabulary. You are pretty hopeless, but at least you make new mi=
stakes from time to time. krw could be an automaton, but why would anybody =
program a mechanism to work that badly?=20
>=20
> You are absolutely hopeless.. I don't think you move to AU on your own,=
=20
they must of kidded out!

Interesting sentence. My wife and I moved back to Australia of our own voli=
tion.
I wonder what Jamie had in mind when he typed "kidded out"? I could guess, =
but why bother? His brain clearly wasn't working as well as it usually does=
 when he posted that message, and it never works particularly well.

--=20
Bill Sloman, Sydney
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Jamie

On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 12:19:58 UTC+11, k...@attt.bizz  wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:40:45 -0500, "Maynard A. Philbrook Jr."
> <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> wrote:=20
> >In article <cadf9fa9-0a0b-48cf-9482-f2d236cc54fb@googlegroups.com>,=20
> >bill.sloman@gmail.com says...
> >> >
> >> > Point proven.  You really are a loser, Sloman.
> >> =20
> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/taunt=20
> >> =20
> >> ":  to reproach or challenge in a mocking or insulting manner :  jeer =
at "=20
> >> =20
> >> I'm not challenging you - I wouldn't waste my time - nor reproaching y=
ou - stupidity isn't something you've got any choice about.  You may feel i=
t to be mocking you,and you may experience it as insulting, but I'd not add=
ed anything to the basic factual observation that you foolishly misuse word=
s you don't properly understand. "Flatlined" originally, and here "proven".
> >>=20
> >> You idea of "what I really am" is just one more example of the inadequ=
acy of your perceptions.
> >=20
> > You really are a party animal! The one they kidded out side, that is!=
=20
> >
> > I am shocked that you have enough energy in that thing called a head,=
=20
sitting on your shoulders, to fire the neurons for proper signaling to your=
 hands for keyboard activity.
> =20
> Sloman only has one.  It's very lonely.

Most people only have one head, and don't experience that as lonely. I've g=
ot several keyboards, but only use one at a time. I do have two hands, and =
go in for ten-finger typing. One hesitates to think what krw might have had=
 in mind (or minds), but then again, who cares what krw might have in whate=
ver he uses to more or less think with. He'll tell us, eventually - as if w=
e needed to know.

--=20
Bill Sloman, Sydney