Electronics-Related.com
Forums

Small single-phase VFD for 120V?

Started by Joerg October 12, 2021
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id 
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:33:25 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <sk9m4k$qvd$1@dont-email.me>. hLmVojKSMWXl
On 2021-10-14, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:30:59 -0700, Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> > wrote: > >>On 10/14/21 7:52 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote: >>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:51:07 -0700, Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/13/21 7:54 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:12:58 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison >>>>> <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Joe Gwinn wrote: >>>>>> ================ >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's best to get a small 3-phase motor for this. >>>>>> >>>>>> ** Giant HUH ??? >>>>>> >>>>>>> VFDs really do not >>>>>>> like their motor circuit opening and closing, as with a centrifugal >>>>>>> switch. >>>>>> >>>>>> ** You feeling OK ? >>>>> >>>>> I'm OK. The issue is that while VFDs intended for machine tools may >>>>> be able to drive a single-phase induction motor as well, but it's best >>>>> to short or bypass the centrifugal switch if using the start winding >>>>> of a single-phase motor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> They might signal a fault and shut down if one or more connections are >>>> seen open. Like when you only connect one of the output phases to a load. >>> >>> True. Some VFDs allow one to program to disable that fault. >>> >> >>Ah, that may be an option. The other job would be to make 110% sure that >>it can never go past 120V because most VFDs put out 230V max, even those >>for 120V input. >> >>> >>>>> >>>>>> Or just got no idea what a Papst AC fan is? >>>>> >>>>> They seem to all be single-phase, with a start winding. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just shaded-pole motors, usually. >>>> >>>> A problem with the small drives from Automation Direct is the same all >>>> the others I looked at have. Aside from transfering 1-phase to 3-phase >>>> even the 120V versions put out 230V max. That's a recipe for magic smoke >>>> even if you tell everyone never to go past 50% or program in a limit. >>>> >>>> https://cdn.automationdirect.com/static/specs/cfw100acdrive.pdf >>>> >>>> Beats me why this is. There are so many applications for variable speed >>>> of smaller induction motors. Such as heated water circulation, cooling >>>> systems et cetera that only need small motors to overcome a miniscule >>>> gravity load. They are single-phase and run on regular mains voltage. >>> >>> The main application for 120 Vac single phase in to 220 Vac three >>> phase in small sizes is to allow three-phase industrial machines to be >>> run from US domestic single-phase power. Three-phase 220 Vac >>> industrial equipment is cheap and plentiful on the used market in the >>> US. >>> >>> One common use is bench grinders and sanders and drill presses, where >>> the variable speed is an added big advantage. One sees a lot of these >>> machines on Craigs List. >>> >> >>Yes, that may be the reaon. Probably not enough market for driving 120V >>motors. >> >> >>> One can also get three-phase fans and circulation pumps, which are >>> intended to be driven by a VFD which is commanded by some kind of PID >>> (Proportional Integral Derivative) temperature controller, versus the >>> more common bang-bang controller. >>> >> >>This situation requires the small muffin-style fans. > > I would hazard that you will need a DC fan for proportional control. > > If I recall, the speed controls in overhead fans (with 4-foot sweep > diameter, consist of switched AC motor capacitors in series with the > motor. I don't recall if I wrote the details down, but this was how > the Hunter fan in one room in my house works. There are likely some > patents on such. There are lots of circuits on the web. The > underlying motor has two windings, and is not shaded pole.
ceiling fans are often capacitor run as this setup provides an easy way to reverse them. (reversing a shaded pole motor is harder) the series capacitor just makes a current limit reducing the torque and thus the speed. if you unbolt the blades you'll see that they always run at the same speed unloaded.
> I suppose that for a shaded-pole induction motor in fan duty, a small > variac would work, but would be a bit clumsy Maybe a tapped > transformer.
capacitor should work too. -- Jasen.
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 4:07:53 AM UTC-7, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> Cunthead, know nothing FUCKING arsehole Bill Slowman bullshitted . > ========================================================= > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, but to burn the motor takes a lot of power and surely running > > > > > > > > the motor from a variac at reduced voltage reduces the liklihood of heat > > > > > > > > damage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** Motor current drops in line with applied AC voltage. > > > > > > > > > > > No, of course it doesn't; > ** Fraid it actually *does* with fan motors. ...
Empirical knowledge of 'fan motors' doesn't relate to the class of AC induction motors. A well-designed induction motor has windings IN THE ROTOR which are short circuited, and good (near 100%) flux coupling from driven stator to that rotor. That's a motor with lots of torque, which dims the lights when started, and many horsepower-per-pound, at high energy efficiency. That motor is, if the rotor is not following the AC frequency, a transformer from an AC input to short-circuited windings (in the rotor). Voltage squared over R becomes a divide-by-zero problem if you stall the motor.
> > > I have a common 40W pedestal fan with a 13 inch dia fan blade. > > > Tested a few minutes ago: > > > > > > At 240VAC rms current is 163mA. > > > at 200VAC it became 144. > > > at 100VAC it become 76. > > > at 50VAC it become 33. > > > > > > by which time the blade was no longer turning. > > > Not far off linear, you *must* agree.
That's specifically a FAN MOTOR, many of which (and there were sewing machine motors like this too) were very inefficient in their flux coupling so that the slow-down burn-up problem would not be fatal, and so that a rheostat control could be added. Those motors are completely atypical of the induction motor type (indeed, might not be true induction motors at all). A specification for that motor wouldn't include 'thermal protection' of the add-an-extra-part type, and wouldn't have efficiency to brag about either.
A nym-shifting stalker, usually "Corvid" also "Charger Boy"
still sore from being spanked in (sci.electronics.repair)...

see also...
=?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=b6rvid?= <bl@ckbirds.org>
=?UTF-8?B?8J+QriBDb3dzIGFyZSBOaWNlIPCfkK4=?= <nice@cows.moo>
Banders <snap@mailchute.com>
Covid-19 <always.look@message.header>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.net>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org>
Cows Are Nice <cows@nice.moo>
Cows are nice <moo@cows.org>
Cows are Nice <nice@cows.moo>
dogs <dogs@home.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Great Pumpkin <pumpkin@patch.net>
Jose Curvo <jcurvo@mymail.com>
Local Favorite <how2recycle@palomar.info>
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Sea <freshness@coast.org>
Standard Poodle <standard@poodle.com>
triangles <build@home.com>
and others...

-- 
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx02.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail > From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Small single-phase VFD for 120V? > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam > References: <islt03Fdtb9U1@mid.individual.net> <5bhbmgl61ctm1mhlnfmqo9658os1iufmo5@4ax.com> <ism1tuFerkoU1@mid.individual.net> <q8ubmg5cunq14rpqg33lkphirep7u3altr@4ax.com> <ismcohFgt8nU1@mid.individual.net> <d0f5b915-90e5-490c-875a-91bf2a27ff9an@googlegroups.com> <66f8470c-6c50-4101-b9ae-7157a8e93701n@googlegroups.com> <e4c7ad52-5915-4db3-8a3d-cdd56e81ac6cn@googlegroups.com> <de8f4f80-6455-4a58-8756-49c3e21604f1n@googlegroups.com> <89c2dc68-cbfd-449c-8847-a35be5f1a0d6n@googlegroups.com> <sk8iih$clf$1@dont-email.me> <f450c032-de59-4302-bb62-0e80d6c9e158n@googlegroups.com> <dc2978bc-aa95-432c-b95d-3561ed35c7edn@googlegroups.com> <1fea09a0-cbbd-4237-b617-6664a297eb04n@googlegroups.com> <1d79963e-0387-4367-8b88-d882b2e97545n@googlegroups.com> <sk9m4k$qvd$1@dont-email.me> > Lines: 18 > Message-ID: <4z_9J.1112217$E24.1014130@usenetxs.com> > X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup > NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:21:52 UTC > Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:21:52 GMT > X-Received-Bytes: 1870 > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:649124 free.spam:16141 > > The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id > <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>: > >> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post... > > And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id > <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>: > >> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from >> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is >> CLUELESS... > > And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another > incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:33:25 -0000 > (UTC) in message-id <sk9m4k$qvd$1@dont-email.me>. > > hLmVojKSMWXl > > >
whit3rd who needs shooting in the head wrote:

==================================
> > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, but to burn the motor takes a lot of power and surely running > > > > > > > > > the motor from a variac at reduced voltage reduces the liklihood of heat > > > > > > > > > damage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** Motor current drops in line with applied AC voltage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, of course it doesn't; > > > ** Fraid it actually *does* with fan motors. ... > > Empirical knowledge of 'fan motors' doesn't relate to the class of AC induction motors. >
=============================================================== ** The ** TOPIC* is speed control of a small fan motor - you ASD fucked POS !! ================================================================
> > > > > I have a common 40W pedestal fan with a 13 inch dia fan blade. > > > > Tested a few minutes ago: > > > > > > > > At 240VAC rms current is 163mA. > > > > at 200VAC it became 144. > > > > at 100VAC it become 76. > > > > at 50VAC it become 33. > > > > > > > > by which time the blade was no longer turning. > > > > Not far off linear, you *must* agree.
> That's specifically a FAN MOTOR,
** Funny how that IS is the ** FUCKING TOPIC ** you ADD MORON ======================================================= Go save us from fucking Google monkey idiots like this 1/3rd wit. .... Phil
Jasen Betts wrote:
=================
>> > > I suppose that for a shaded-pole induction motor in fan duty, a small > > variac would work, but would be a bit clumsy Maybe a tapped > > transformer. > > capacitor should work too. >
** Yes it will, but is not so stable. Q. Why does nobody here ever trim ?? ...... Phil
On Tuesday, 12 October 2021 at 22:30:39 UTC+1, Joerg wrote:
> On 10/12/21 2:16 PM, Phil Allison wrote: > > Joerg wrote: > > ------------------ > >> Looking for a "better dimmer" to speed-control two small AC fans. They > >> do not seem to like any kind of dimmer, fan-rated or not. > >> > > > > ** Have you tried a Variac? > > > > Work just fine with most kinds of induction motor fans. > > > Yes, sorry, that was in an answer to John and not in the original post. > There is a UPS up front and that doesn't even like the smallest variac I > have. The inverter in the UPS starts to buzz and then issues an overload > shut-off even without any fans connected to its tap-off. The UPS is a > small one with a modified sine inverter, no space for anything bigger there. > > This was a puzzler to me because that same variac runs fine on a smaller > 200W modified sine camping inverter, with and without fans connected.
tried an RC to reduce variac idle current? ... plus some series variable/switched R to get it all upto voltage without tripping
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id 
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:47:17 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <ska50k$ta4$3@dont-email.me>. Zl04FJBbjVa9
Tabby meeowed:
==============
> > > This was a puzzler to me because that same variac runs fine on a smaller > > 200W modified sine camping inverter, with and without fans connected. > > tried an RC to reduce variac idle current?
** Huh ??
> ... plus some series variable/switched R to get it all upto voltage without tripping
** The OP may need to use a NTC thermistor in series with the Variac's primary to reduce inrush current and asymmetry offset effects at switch on. Bout 200 ohms might be right. ...... Phil
On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 8:12:16 AM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> whit3rd who needs shooting in the head wrote: > > ================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, but to burn the motor takes a lot of power and surely running > > > > > > > > > > the motor from a variac at reduced voltage reduces the liklihood of heat > > > > > > > > > > damage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** Motor current drops in line with applied AC voltage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, of course it doesn't; > > > > > ** Fraid it actually *does* with fan motors. ... > > > > Empirical knowledge of 'fan motors' doesn't relate to the class of AC induction motors. > > > =============================================================== > ** The ** TOPIC* is speed control of a small fan motor - you ASD fucked POS !! > ================================================================ > > > > > > > I have a common 40W pedestal fan with a 13 inch dia fan blade. > > > > > Tested a few minutes ago: > > > > > > > > > > At 240VAC rms current is 163mA. > > > > > at 200VAC it became 144. > > > > > at 100VAC it become 76. > > > > > at 50VAC it become 33. > > > > > > > > > > by which time the blade was no longer turning. > > > > > Not far off linear, you *must* agree. > > > That's specifically a FAN MOTOR, > > ** Funny how that IS is the ** FUCKING TOPIC ** you ADD MORON
But a 40W pedestal fan with a 13" diameter is along way from the muffin-type fans that Jeorg was trying to deal with. For one thing. it is a lot bigger. For another it is a mass-market consumer item, engineered for minim cost, when the muffin fans are manufactured in much lower volumes, for a more demanding market.
> Go save us from fucking Google monkey idiots like this 1/3rd wit.
Phil does seem to exemplify the breed. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney