On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:52:59 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>> The millampere/hour number will be *smaller* for the smaller battery >> too. Duh. > >Or, it might not. Duh. Duh.You are an absolute idiot. The capacity will be less for the smaller device. Guaranteed. Also guaranteed that you are a stupid fuck. Especially with that "you miss stuff routinely" baby bullshit. Dr. Dynamite? Dr. Dipshit is more like it, Napoleon. kabang that, you stupid fuck.
Re: Battery Difference between CR2032 and CR2025
Started by ●September 3, 2012
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:59:37 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>On 04/29/2016 06:42 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> >> Gave us: >> >>>> Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability >>>> would yield useful results. >>> >>> Maybe not, though. >> >> I take it back. You're not an idiot. You're dumber than dogshit. > >Let me help you...You are an inept dumbfuck. You cannot even help yourself.>"CR2032 CR2025 compatible" is a better bet.Wrong again, asswipe. The world is not as dumbed down as a putz like you is.> Use common language."interchangeability" IS a common term, stupid jackass.>Who is really going to use the clumsy term "interchangeability" in their >search?Had you tried, you would already know that the search.... That PRECISE search about those two batteries IS an often searched question. But you are too self centered with your thumb up your ass and then into your mouth to have any clue. Something your mother taught you, I am sure.>You had to use a dictionary to spell it.Nice try, putz.>And how many web pages >are going to contain the word?Again... You are decidedly too stupid, and obviously did not perform the search. I cannot help you with your abject stupidity. Looks like your mom should be in prison for failing to flush you, the moment the stupid slut shat you.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On 4/29/2016 12:53 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:59:37 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> > Gave us: > >> On 04/29/2016 06:42 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> >>> Gave us: >>> >>>>> Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability >>>>> would yield useful results. >>>> >>>> Maybe not, though. >>> >>> I take it back. You're not an idiot. You're dumber than dogshit. >> >> Let me help you... > > You are an inept dumbfuck. You cannot even help yourself. > >> "CR2032 CR2025 compatible" is a better bet. > > Wrong again, asswipe. The world is not as dumbed down as a putz like > you is. > >> Use common language. > > "interchangeability" IS a common term, stupid jackass. > >> Who is really going to use the clumsy term "interchangeability" in their >> search? > > Had you tried, you would already know that the search.... That > PRECISE search about those two batteries IS an often searched question. > > But you are too self centered with your thumb up your ass and then > into your mouth to have any clue. Something your mother taught you, I > am sure. > >> You had to use a dictionary to spell it. > > Nice try, putz. > >> And how many web pages >> are going to contain the word? > > Again... You are decidedly too stupid, and obviously did not perform > the search. I cannot help you with your abject stupidity. > > Looks like your mom should be in prison for failing to flush you, the > moment the stupid slut shat you. >Another thread polluted and sullied by DecadentIdiotAlwaysWrong who contributes only insults rather than engineering-type information.
Reply by ●April 30, 20162016-04-30
On 04/29/2016 10:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:52:59 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> > Gave us: > >>> The millampere/hour number will be *smaller* for the smaller battery >>> too. Duh. >> >> Or, it might not. Duh. Duh. > > > You are an absolute idiot. The capacity will be less for the smaller > device. Guaranteed. > > Also guaranteed that you are a stupid fuck. Especially with that "you > miss stuff routinely" baby bullshit. > > Dr. Dynamite? Dr. Dipshit is more like it, Napoleon. kabang that, > you stupid fuck.Take another look at the post by leegrimjr, and then your utterly ridiculous reply to that post. This will be therapeutic. You need to do this in order to appreciate the enormity of your own stupidity.
Reply by ●April 30, 20162016-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:13:18 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>On 04/29/2016 10:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:52:59 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> >> Gave us: >> >>>> The millampere/hour number will be *smaller* for the smaller battery >>>> too. Duh. >>> >>> Or, it might not. Duh. Duh. >> >> >> You are an absolute idiot. The capacity will be less for the smaller >> device. Guaranteed. >> >> Also guaranteed that you are a stupid fuck. Especially with that "you >> miss stuff routinely" baby bullshit. >> >> Dr. Dynamite? Dr. Dipshit is more like it, Napoleon. kabang that, >> you stupid fuck. > >Take another look at the post by leegrimjr, and then your utterly >ridiculous reply to that post. This will be therapeutic. You need to do >this in order to appreciate the enormity of your own stupidity.Says the putz with the minuscule brain, and lack of ability to understand that capacity and form factor are tied together. Your first name really is Napoleon.
Reply by ●June 22, 20162016-06-22
On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 6:24:44 PM UTC-5, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote:> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > there any reason not to use the 2025? > > --------------Old post, but full answer here. As many have said, the 2025 is 2.5 mm thick, the 2032 is 3.2 mm thick. Some battery holders might not properly take the alternate size. Second item - at least for one brand, the ..32 has 240 mAh while the ..25 is 163 mAh. The ..25 will last about 2/3 as long as the ..32
Reply by ●June 30, 20162016-06-30
Reply by ●July 2, 20162016-07-02
Τη Τρίτη, 4 Σεπτεμβρίου 2012 - 2:24:44 π.μ. UTC+3, ο χρήστης fred.fl...@thecave.com έγραψε:> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > there any reason not to use the 2025? > > --------------There are deferances in battery current CR2032 is double the CR2025, and in the dimentions (especialy in width) 2,5mm CR2023 and 3,2mm the CR2032 one!
Reply by ●July 2, 20162016-07-02
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT), a.peponaras@gmail.com Gave us:>?? ?????, 4 ??????????? 2012 - 2:24:44 ?.?. UTC+3, ? ??????? fred.fl...@thecave.com ??????: >> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at >> a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The >> CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is >> there any reason not to use the 2025? >> >> -------------- > >There are deferances in battery current CR2032 is double the CR2025, and in the > dimentions (especialy in width) 2,5mm CR2023 and 3,2mm the CR2032 one!There are differences in the capacity as well. Use some common sense. Same storage technology, different physical form factor. I will leave it to you to figure out whether it is the larger or smaller battery which has slightly less capacity. Although a child might take the Nickel over the dime because it is bigger, but some take the dime because it is shiny-er.
Reply by ●November 7, 20162016-11-07
On Monday, September 10, 2012 at 7:22:22 PM UTC-7, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote:> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 00:30:29 +0100, "Simon Stroud" > <simon.stroud@btoutternet.com> wrote: > > > > >"Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote in message > >news:VXb1s.1879$1T1.83@newsfe05.iad... > >> fred.flintstone@thecave.com wrote: > >> > >>> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > >>> a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > >>> CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > >>> there any reason not to use the 2025? > >>> > >>> -------------- > >>> > >> They are the same except that the 25 is lower amp rating. The > >> 25 at the end is 2.5mm verses the 3.2 mm you were using.. It'll > >> work just fine but not last as long. Probably it'll last long enough > >> for the rest of that computer's life. > >> > >> the 20 at the start is the width of the cell. > >> > >> I am doing this from memory but it should be correct. > >> > >> Jamie. > >> > > > >Yep that's correct. > > > >For a 2032, the 20 means the diameter (20mm) and the 32 means the thickness > >(3.2mm). The 2025 is 2.5mm thick and the even thinner 2016 is 1.6mm thick. > > > >Most sockets are designed for a particular thickness so as others have > >noted, the 2025 will not fit the socket correctly. > > > >Regards, > >Simon. > > > > It's contacting fine, and is working to keep my clock set. Teh contacts > are on the side of the case part of the battery, so it seems to work > just fine. This is an older IBM computer, and it needs a new battery > every 8 months or so. It always has since I bought it around 2004. > Seems that IBM computers all had (or still have) this problem. I'll > live with it. At least they dont seem to have failing capacitors and > the other failures that some other brands are known to have. Aside from > eating batteries, these IBM systems seem to run forever. > > I should mention that I always shut off a power strip for the computer > and all components hooked to it. I was told that leaving it plugged in > and just shutting off the power switch would save batteries. But I'd > probably pay for it in my electric bill, and possibly lose a computer > from lightning. Lightning strikes are common on farms. I tend to lose > a modem at least once a year and recently lost a DTV converter. I'd > have to disconnect the antennas and phone lines and darn near everything > else to prevent this. That gets to be a major hassle.It should be noted that turning on and off the computer is more damaging than leaving it on! The worst thing for electronic equipment is heating then cooling. If left on, the temperature remains relatively constant. The expansion and contraction on the circuit boards, soldering joints and silicon chips all have this problem. Just like a light bulb, it is better to leave it on.
