On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 4:24:44 PM UTC-7, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote:> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > there any reason not to use the 2025? > > --------------
Re: Battery Difference between CR2032 and CR2025
Started by ●September 3, 2012
Reply by ●April 17, 20162016-04-17
Reply by ●April 17, 20162016-04-17
In article <737ea637-e8ab-4a41-a43c-cf43e12b4db0@googlegroups.com>, roverguy003@gmail.com wrote:> On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 4:24:44 PM UTC-7, fred.fl...@thecave.com > wrote: > > My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > > a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > > CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > > there any reason not to use the 2025? > > > > --------------You might as well use it, just make sure it is secure in the battery socket and the spring contact is not loose. How long did the CR2032 last? Probably several years. Expect the CR2025 to last about 2/3 as long. Fred
Reply by ●April 28, 20162016-04-28
On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 7:24:44 PM UTC-4, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote:> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at > a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The > CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is > there any reason not to use the 2025? > > --------------My guess is it probably already has been replaced!! LMAO!!!!!
Reply by ●April 28, 20162016-04-28
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT), leegrimjr@gmail.com Gave us:>On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 7:24:44 PM UTC-4, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote: >> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at >> a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The >> CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is >> there any reason not to use the 2025? >> >> -------------- > >My guess is it probably already has been replaced!! LMAO!!!!!The form factor (size and shape) is the only difference. If the receptacle retains it, it should be just fine. Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability would yield useful results.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On 04/28/2016 06:35 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT), leegrimjr@gmail.com Gave us: > >> On Monday, September 3, 2012 at 7:24:44 PM UTC-4, fred.fl...@thecave.com wrote: >>> My computer clock battery died. It had a CR2032. I bought a CR2025 at >>> a store going out of business (No Returns). Both say they are 3v. The >>> CR2025 is a little thinner, but otherwise they are the same size. Is >>> there any reason not to use the 2025? >>> >>> -------------- >> >> My guess is it probably already has been replaced!! LMAO!!!!! > > The form factor (size and shape) is the only difference.I think the mass is probably different too. And the sound when it's struck.> If the receptacle retains it, it should be just fine.More to it than that.> Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability > would yield useful results.Maybe not, though.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>> The form factor (size and shape) is the only difference. > >I think the mass is probably different too. >And the sound when it's struck.Use some common sense. If the size and shape differ, the mass will as well. The millampere/hour number will be *smaller* for the smaller battery too. Duh. Is your first name Napoleon?
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>> If the receptacle retains it, it should be just fine. > >More to it than that.You're an idiot.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> Gave us:>> Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability >> would yield useful results. > >Maybe not, though.I take it back. You're not an idiot. You're dumber than dogshit.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On 04/29/2016 06:41 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> > Gave us: > >>> The form factor (size and shape) is the only difference. >> >> I think the mass is probably different too. >> And the sound when it's struck. > > Use some common sense. If the size and shape differ, the mass will as > well.Isn't common sense to you, except in hindsight. You miss stuff routinely.> The millampere/hour number will be *smaller* for the smaller battery > too. Duh.Or, it might not. Duh. Duh.
Reply by ●April 29, 20162016-04-29
On 04/29/2016 06:42 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:12:50 -0700, "Dr. Dynamite" <ka-bang@mail.com> > Gave us: > >>> Maybe a simple google search for CR2032 CR2025 interchangeability >>> would yield useful results. >> >> Maybe not, though. > > I take it back. You're not an idiot. You're dumber than dogshit.Let me help you... "CR2032 CR2025 compatible" is a better bet. Use common language. Who is really going to use the clumsy term "interchangeability" in their search? You had to use a dictionary to spell it. And how many web pages are going to contain the word?
