Electronics-Related.com
Forums

Using mobile phone as an internet radio

Started by jim stone October 2, 2012
"George Herold" <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote in message 
news:6d1dd2cb-0c34-4443-9254-a2231707b3d1@j14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 5, 6:20 am, Roderick Stewart
<r...@escapetime.removethisbit.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <de99517e-e5e1-4f9d-91e0- > > 412ab3171...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, George Herold wrote: > > And that s it. Repeated on and off means that the thin region has a > > higher average temperature than the thick part of the filament. It > > evaporates faster and fails sooner. > > Won't a thin region of a lamp filament have a higher temperature than > the rest of it all the time, not just when the lamp is turning on? > > Rod. > --
: Hmm, sure, maybe... I really have no idea. But I can't remember ever seeing a bulb fail after being on for a while. (I'm sure it must happen.) It does, I have seen it quite often. :They almost always go when you turn them on, from which I conclude that the turn on is more 'stressful'. Indeed, this is usually when filament bulbd fail. : Say does Don Klipstein still lurk here? He may have some info on turn- on failure. http://donklipstein.com/ George H.
"Phil Hobbs" <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in message 
news:MLqdnZyuL9Izje3NnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@supernews.com...
SNIP
>> >> Aren't the filaments welded to the elements at the ends? It would seem >> that >> this would cause a narrowing. ISTR most filaments broken near the >> supports, >> which would be counter to the hotter-in-the-middle theory. > > The feedthroughs are made of Dumet, which is basically 42Ni stainless with > a borated copper coating to bind to the glass. It's much lower-melting > than the tungsten, so spot-welding them together shouldn't affect the > tungsten much.
Just crimped over AFAIK. Should work fine - the softer metal will cold form around the tungsten see http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Filament.jpg
> > I've never seen one burn out that wasn't energized.
They can, but no very often.
> But you're the big-iron transmitter guy. Gotta run, I have a bunch of > guys coming to the lab in a few minutes, and I have to start the coffee > pot! > > Cheers > > Phil Hobbs > > > -- > Dr Philip C D Hobbs > Principal Consultant > ElectroOptical Innovations LLC > Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics >
T wrote:
> In article <k4jdel$cb4$2@reversiblemaps.ath.cx>, jasen@xnet.co.nz > says... >> >> On 2012-10-02, jim stone <tgh6h56nzh@mail.invalid> wrote: >>> Not being able to find a small internet radio to buy we liked, we >>> got mobile phone with which we link with wi-fi to a modem router, >>> and use it as an internet radio. >>> >>> Keeping the phoned plugged into its charger all the time, we are >>> using it to play *all-day* background classical music through an >>> amplifier and speakers. >>> >>> Since the phone has no 'moving parts' unlike a computer, we are >>> wondering if this continuous playing all day of the phone is going >>> to shorten its working life ? >> >> It may be bad for the battery > > My favorite apps on my phone: > > TuneIn, Pandora, ScannerRadioPro, EchoLink and RepeaterBook. > > And that's kind of why I got the extended battery pack for the phone. >
Another you might like: Solent radio on the net http://www.ship-tracking.co.uk/Radio/radiopage.html Steve Terry -- Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and &#4294967295;5 bonus after activation at: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 12:51 PM, &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;hw&#4294967295;&#4294967295;f wrote: >> Phil Hobbs wrote: >>> [......] >>> >>> Stew Leonard's Espresso Roast, roasted fresh daily in sunny Yonkers. >>> Best beans I've ever come across, and worth the trip. Always a crowd >>> pleaser. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Phil Hobbs >>> >> Sorry to hijack this thread but I have an actual electronics repair >> question: how do I go about getting my old AIWA CX-NA10 stereo system to >> read CD's again? Is the lazer bad? It detects the cd and spins up but >> wont play it. >> >> >> > You're no fun anymore. > > Cheers > > Phil Hobbs >
Uh huh. I fixed it somewhat by fiddling with the screw behind the back cover. G00gle told me how. You lot are obviously quite useless. <nods> -- http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/ www.friendsofanimals.org |www.snuhwolf.9f.com| _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____ / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\ _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\ /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Sounds like a bargain to me. Very few other organizations would leave > money on the table like that. I sure wouldn't. Would you?
It depends upon wat you consider a fair price and what you want people to do. If you want people from the US to NOT export cheap items then you keep your postal rates high. If you want everyone to have a small business selling items over the internet then you keep your postal prices low.
> Plus they save on duty by claiming that everything is a gift. Such > generous folks, those Chinese.
The only gift is to the customs officers receiving the packages. If it is a gift and the price is low, then they can pass it without inspection, and if it is inspected just look for the diamonds, guns, drugs, etc hidden in it. For example, just ordered about several each of 10 different items (around 40 items in all), from a vendor in Hong Kong. If he sent it to a US address and lists it as a gift, the US customs can do a quick inspection if they do any at all. If he declares each item, and they inspect the package, they have to figure out which is which, measure and weigh them and ascertain that they are what is claimed, and the weight matches. In this case most of the items were some some sort of USB fob, so good luck.
> What treaties are those, and do they guarantee the same rates for everyone?
They are international postal treaties and the guarantee the same rates between signatories. Or in plain English, each country pays the other the same rates, but are free to charge their internal customers anything they want.
> > Depends what's important to you, of course. Mostly when I'm in Europe I > do my calling over wifi using UMA, so it costs the same as at home. But > I only go there every couple of years.
Assuming you can find WiFi. Some places think free wifi is a right, others charge you high rates for it. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM/KBUH7245/KBUW5379 "Owning a smartphone: Technology's equivalent to learning to play chopsticks on the piano as a child and thinking you're a musician." (sent to me by a friend)
On 10/06/2012 03:34 PM, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote: >> Sounds like a bargain to me. Very few other organizations would leave >> money on the table like that. I sure wouldn't. Would you? > > It depends upon wat you consider a fair price and what you want people to do. > If you want people from the US to NOT export cheap items then you keep your > postal rates high.
A fair price is what a willing buyer will pay in a competitive market. If you were a logistics company, or for that matter a unionized proletarian, you charge what the traffic will bear. That works as long as there's competition--the more the better in general. You can't keep jacking up the price if your customers can just go down the street to your competitor.
> > If you want everyone to have a small business selling items over the internet > then you keep your postal prices low.
If you want to have economic efficiency, you avoid state enterprises and subsidies except where there's a compelling interest at stake--for instance the French pay more for food because they in effect subsidize small farmers, in order to keep the life of rural France alive. I'm quite fond of rural France, so I can understand their point. Postal services? Well, sure, folks in the boonies need to be able to send in their tax returns. ;)
> >> Plus they save on duty by claiming that everything is a gift. Such >> generous folks, those Chinese. > > The only gift is to the customs officers receiving the packages. If it is > a gift and the price is low, then they can pass it without inspection, and > if it is inspected just look for the diamonds, guns, drugs, etc hidden > in it. > > For example, just ordered about several each of 10 different items > (around 40 items in all), from a vendor in Hong Kong. If he sent it to a > US address and lists it as a gift, the US customs can do a quick inspection > if they do any at all. > > If he declares each item, and they inspect the package, they have to figure > out which is which, measure and weigh them and ascertain that they are > what is claimed, and the weight matches.
They say it's a gift regardless of how much it costs.
> > In this case most of the items were some some sort of USB fob, so good luck. > >> What treaties are those, and do they guarantee the same rates for everyone? > > They are international postal treaties and the guarantee the same rates > between signatories. Or in plain English, each country pays the other > the same rates, but are free to charge their internal customers anything > they want.
Do you have a link? I'd be interested to have a look.
> >> >> Depends what's important to you, of course. Mostly when I'm in Europe I >> do my calling over wifi using UMA, so it costs the same as at home. But >> I only go there every couple of years. > > Assuming you can find WiFi. Some places think free wifi is a right, others > charge you high rates for it.
Generally the places I've stayed have had free or at least cheap wifi. That's in Flanders, Artois, and Florence, most recently. And anyway, since I'm on vacation when I go there, I don't really want to be in constant touch with home! Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
> > In article <epudnWDGL-LfiO3NnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@supernews.com>, > Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: > > > The Americans do seem generally to be used to sending a lot by courier > > > when we would just put in the post. Tending to happen in the UK also > > > even though the Royal Mail / Parcelforce often give a better service > > > and of course do not charge extra to send further. There has been a > > > big campaign in the North of Scotland about companies charging extra > > > for many postcode areas. > > > That's mostly a business etiquette thing, I think. Sending somebody a > > bunch of business documents in the snail mail sort of says that their > > input isn't that urgent. Letter mail here is also very secure IME. > > Fine if 'they' want to do this and pay for it. My complaint is buying > goods from the US where I'm paying the P&P and not having the choice of a > reasonably priced service. Why would I want to pay in some cases more than > the value of the goods for postage, if I'm in no rush to receive them?
Have you ever tried to mail a thousand+ packages a week? A local non profit group had a post office refuse their business, because of the volume. they had to get a politician involved, since USPS is the only way they are allowed to ship the gifts to our troops. Over $100,000 a year in postal fees, and were told to go away. By law, they can't ship a box full of stuff to a base. Each package requires a separate customs form to be filled out by hand. UPS and other shippers park an empty semi trailer at the dock of large customers, and haul it directly to the hub. That entire process can be automated.
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:29:23 -0600, &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;hw&#4294967295;&#4294967295;f <snuhwolf@netscape.net>
wrote:

>Phil Hobbs wrote: >> On 10/06/2012 12:51 PM, &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;hw&#4294967295;&#4294967295;f wrote: >>> Phil Hobbs wrote: >>>> [......] >>>> >>>> Stew Leonard's Espresso Roast, roasted fresh daily in sunny Yonkers. >>>> Best beans I've ever come across, and worth the trip. Always a crowd >>>> pleaser. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Phil Hobbs >>>> >>> Sorry to hijack this thread but I have an actual electronics repair >>> question: how do I go about getting my old AIWA CX-NA10 stereo system to >>> read CD's again? Is the lazer bad? It detects the cd and spins up but >>> wont play it. >>> >>> >>> >> You're no fun anymore. >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil Hobbs >> > >Uh huh. I fixed it somewhat by fiddling with the screw behind the back >cover. G00gle told me how. You lot are obviously quite useless. > ><nods>
--- Hardly surprising, since your query would have more appropriately been directed to sci.electronics.repair. -- JF
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;hw&#4294967295;&#4294967295;f wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote: > >> On 10/06/2012 12:51 PM, &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;hw&#4294967295;&#4294967295;f wrote: >> >>> Phil Hobbs wrote: >>> >>>> [......] >>>> >>>> Stew Leonard's Espresso Roast, roasted fresh daily in sunny Yonkers. >>>> Best beans I've ever come across, and worth the trip. Always a crowd >>>> pleaser. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Phil Hobbs >>>> >>> Sorry to hijack this thread but I have an actual electronics repair >>> question: how do I go about getting my old AIWA CX-NA10 stereo system to >>> read CD's again? Is the lazer bad? It detects the cd and spins up but >>> wont play it. >>> >>> >>> >> You're no fun anymore. >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil Hobbs >> > > Uh huh. I fixed it somewhat by fiddling with the screw behind the back > cover. G00gle told me how. You lot are obviously quite useless. > > <nods> > >
Yes we are. Hope to see you soon. Jamie
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> Plus they save on duty by claiming that everything is a gift. Such=20 >> generous folks, those Chinese. >=20 > The only gift is to the customs officers receiving the packages. If it =
is
> a gift and the price is low, then they can pass it without inspection, =
and
> if it is inspected just look for the diamonds, guns, drugs, etc hidden > in it.=20 >=20
For import to the UK, declaring it as a gift increases the value that is = allowed before VAT and duty is imposed, so, when used for items of low=20 value, but more than =A315 (at the moment) including postage, it defrauds= =20 the government of revenue. These are not, I believe free allowances,=20 but rather values below which it is considered not worth recovering=20 duty. With the Royal Mail, it also triggers a customs processing charge.=