whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in news:eb3d5fd7-c979-4083-ab26- 764272b47786n@googlegroups.com:> > Protest versus riot, language can slant the issue. > Weapons can be sticks, bombs, or anything in between. >"The Shaman"... That dude's flag pole had a spear haed attached to it. So did the flag poles of many of the others. Five cops died that day, zero protesters. John Dope is about the dimmest dope posting in SED.
OT: If US Democrats and neocons hate Russia, why not produce more gas?
Started by ●June 16, 2022
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t8nm6l$5j9$9@dont-email.me:> If it were an attempt to overthrow our government, it wasn't, they > would have gone to the executive branch and brought a few weapons > with them...You are an idiot. "The executive branch" was the one performing the coup attempt, you fucking idiot.> We need John Belushi back to make SNL funny again.You are a goddamned retard. You obviously do not watch SNL or you would know that it is still quite funny. Your stupidity is funny too.> He would be the > guy with the horns cannibal leftists love to talk about.John Dope is an abject idiot. He proves it with everything he writes.> Entering > and sitting down at Nancy Pelosi's desk with his boots on the > table, he calls general Milley and starts giving him orders... > That would be funny because it's ridiculous.So is your take on the incident.> January 6 was no threat to our government.You are an absolute idiot and you respouting Tucker's stupid shit does not change that.> Anybody who believes it > was is nuts.So, just sit is the bathtub and splash, little boy. You are an idiot.> It might have felt threatening to some members of > Congress that day,Can you really be that fucking stupid?> but it was not a threat to our country in any > way, shape, or form.So, taking a baseball bat to your skull would not be a threat to your ability to continue to breathe, right?> One REAL threat to our government and our country is the fact > Washington DC is 91+% gung ho for only one party. The Deep State > was described over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov > 11, 1815...You are an idiot. Were that true, the nation would have been ONLY democrats since then. Since that is not what we have, your "deep state" claim is more than a little lame.> "it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen,Wow. The retard who calls folks "cannibal leftists" now wants to show us his "gentleman" side. You are a fucking lunatic retard, John Dope.> that you will find the > invisible and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble > views, and prevents or weakens the effect of all the salutary > reforms which France is incessantly calling for" (quoted on > Merriam-Webster's site).John Dope... dumber than dogshit and he is proud of his stupidity too!> That passage appears in an item headed "Courts of Justice in > France", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815. It > is a report of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville.Whoopie fuckin' doo, you retarded fuck!
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
If the rowdy faction of the January 6 protest were an attempt to overthrow our government, it wasn't, they would have gone to the executive branch and brought a few weapons with them... We need John Belushi back to make SNL funny again. He would be the guy with the horns cannibal leftists love to talk about. Entering and sitting down at Nancy Pelosi's desk with his boots on the table, he calls general Milley and starts giving him orders... That would be funny because it's ridiculous. January 6 was no threat to our government. Anybody who believes it was is nuts. It might have felt threatening to some members of Congress that day, but it was not a threat to our country in any way, shape, or form. One REAL threat to our government and our country is the fact Washington DC is 91+% gung ho for only one party. The Deep State was described over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815... "it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly calling for" (quoted on Merriam-Webster's site). That passage appears in an item headed "Courts of Justice in France", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815. It is a report of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville.
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
I don't believe the 91%+ Democrat Washington DC swamp coroner said about the protesters, but... https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/us/politics/jan-6-capitol-deaths.html WOW... Apparently FOUR Washington DC officers killed themselves after the protest. Two of them within days, the other two in July. Probably some partly in response to the killing of unarmed VETERAN Ashley Babbitt. The only other DC officer that died, died of a stroke after the incident. If Democrats wanted to seem legitimate, they should have at least let Republicans choose their side for the committee hearing. Democrats choosing the Republican side, including utterly RINO Liz Cheney as the Republican co-chair, is stark naked partisanship politics. -- Nothing to do with anything Always Wrong said.
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:> He didn't tell anyone to enter a nominally closed government building. > A few yahoos entered an under-guarded building to take some selfies. > That's not insurrection and certainly not treason.Assuming the report that four of the officers involved committed suicide... Feeling they did a bad job, like being part of lax security promoted by Nancy Pelosi, might be part of the reason. That, besides having some involvement with the shooting death of unarmed veteran Ashley Babbitt.
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 10:25:48 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:> If it were an attempt to overthrow our government, it wasn't, they would > have gone to the executive branch and brought a few weapons with them...Our administrative branch isn't more important than the others, just quicker and arguably more photogenic. The 'a few weapons' that nineteen terrorists used on 9/11 were sufficient. The mob didn't exactly submit to weapons search at the door (or windows) they entered by.> January 6 was no threat to our government. Anybody who believes it was is > nuts.Arrogant, and dismissive, but one branch of our government, the one that represents the citizenry, already voted you down on that.>The Deep State was described over > 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815... > > "it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible > and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and...Yeah, after the French revolution the views of the nobles (noble views, you see) weren't entirely in a position of power. Not seeing the storming of the Congress as being very popular, it's not the storming of the Bastille.
Reply by ●June 19, 20222022-06-19
If it were an attempt to overthrow our government, it wasn't, they would have gone to the executive branch and brought a few weapons with them... Anybody who thinks it was an attempt to overthrow our government is nuts. We need John Belushi back to make SNL funny again. He would be the guy with the horns cannibal leftists love to talk about. Entering and sitting down at Nancy Pelosi's desk with his boots on the table, he calls general Milley and starts giving him orders... That would be funny because it's ridiculous. January 6 was no threat to our government. Anybody who believes it was is nuts. It might have felt threatening to some members of Congress that day, but it was not a threat to our country in any way, shape, or form. One REAL threat to our government and our country is the fact Washington DC is 91+% gung ho for only one party. The Deep State was described over 200 years ago in a London Times article on Nov 11, 1815... "it is in this bureaucracy, Gentlemen, that you will find the invisible and mischievous power which thwarts the most noble views, and prevents or weakens the effect of all the salutary reforms which France is incessantly calling for" (quoted on Merriam-Webster's site). That passage appears in an item headed "Courts of Justice in France", on page 2 of the Times for Saturday November 11, 1815, a report of a speech by Jean Guillaume Hyde de Neuville.
Reply by ●June 21, 20222022-06-21
On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 3:49:16 AM UTC+2, John Doe wrote:> If it were an attempt to overthrow our government, it wasn't, they would > have gone to the executive branch and brought a few weapons with them...They did bring a few weapons with them. Nothing all that effective, but they did have some.> Anybody who thinks it was an attempt to overthrow our government is nuts.Donald Trump was still in charge of the executive branch, even through he had been voted out - Biden wasn't going to be ratified as the new president until the 20th January 2020. Trump wasn't trying to overthrow himself - his aim was to prevent Biden's ratification, which is to say to overthrow the US system of government by disrupting the orderly replacement of a president who had lost an election. <snip>> January 6 was no threat to our government. Anybody who believes it was is > nuts. It might have felt threatening to some members of Congress that day, > but it was not a threat to our country in any way, shape, or form.It would have turned your country from one where new presidents are elected to one where a president who has lost an election can use a mob to avoid getting replaced by the guy who won the election. That would have reduced your country to a banana republic. You don't see this as threat because you are remarkably stupid. Most people have more sense.> One REAL threat to our government and our country is the fact Washington DC is 91+% gung ho for only one party.The real threat to your country is the fact that the Republican Party is a smoking ruin. The Koch brothers astro-turfed it into an ineffectual bunch of clowns with their Tea Party Faction which was so ineffectual that they could not find a more attractive presidential candidate than Donald Trump, and he sifted through the trash that remained to pick out people who were silly enough to be his sycophants. It's amazing that 9% of the Washington DC population can't see that Donald Trump is an unelectable disaster. The rest of the country contains rather more intellectual basket cases, but the people in Washington DC are there to run the country. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by ●June 21, 20222022-06-21
No point in discussing anything with Bill "Bozo" Sloman, the Australian troll. Bozo is an incessant liar who cannot be reasoned with. Its fiction never ends. "the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic) "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so" (Bozo being Bozo) "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions" (Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist)
Reply by ●June 22, 20222022-06-22
On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:27:35 AM UTC+2, John Doe wrote:> No point in discussing anything with Bill Sloman.<snipped the rest of the recycled drivel> John Doe can't do discussion, so his opinion on whether it would be a useful exercise for anybody else can't be seen as all that helpful. In theory might be interesting to speculate how well he comprehends his own incompetence, but he certainly acts as he thinks his demented delusions are worth posting. If he went around painting offensive nonsense on walls, he would eventually end up in jail, but doing much the same here doesn't expose you to effective sanctions. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
