More bs? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01345-3
Scientists make non-toxic quantum dots for shortwave infrared image sensors
Started by ●January 18, 2024
Reply by ●January 18, 20242024-01-18
On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 6:24:57 AM UTC+11, jim whitby wrote:> More bs? > > https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01345-3Nature is a pretty respectable scientific publisher, Nobody is going to be much interested until you can buy the parts from a broad-line distributor, but the peer review process is a device for restricting publication to people who are publishing sensible information. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by ●January 20, 20242024-01-20
On 18/01/2024 19:24, jim whitby wrote:> More bs? > > https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01345-3Unlikely. Nature is a highly respected peer reviewed journal - their silver telluride based sensor will make regulators very happy if it can be sensibly mass produced. It is a very long way from a laboratory prototype to a mass produced product that you can buy though. Consumer applications of (Nobel prize winning) graphene are still thin on the ground and that has been a hot topic for nearly two decades now! -- Martin Brown
