Electronics-Related.com
Forums

Minicircuits ZFL-500 directivity question

Started by bitrex November 4, 2023
On 11/8/2023 5:02 PM, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:11:31 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: > >> They're nice lil modules, I didn't have this purpose in mind but I >> wonder if they make a LNA suitable to replace the shit ass front end on >> my DTV antenna, I live in a fringe area so reception varies by the day. >> and I'm in a condo so mounting stuff outdoors not really feasible > > That ZFL-500 is not very suitable as antenna amplifier for DTV. First > of all it is quite noisy, noise figure NF = 4.2 dB (typical). These > days a good antenna amplifier the NF should be below 3 dB. That > amplifier is specified only up to 500 MHz, thus most UHF channels are > out of range. However, it might still work since the specs are good at > 500 MHz, wonder why the specs ends at 500 MHz.
Yeah it has gain for days. S21 is above 20dB well past 1 GHz.
> An antenna amplifier should be installed _at_ the antenna, thus the > cable between amplifier and DTV receiver can be long. > > You seem to suffer from tropospheric fading and the signal nulls can > be quite deep and the signal is still momentary lost no matter what > antenna amplifier you use. Only a proper outdoor antenna will really > help.
I'll see if high pressure systems seem to make it better...atm with a planar antenna and associated amp I'm getting a station with a purported field strength of -70 dBm at 36 miles no problem if I kinda point it in that direction, but a station at 16 miles -50 dBm doesn't come in at all /shrug
On 2023-11-07 17:45, Simon S Aysdie wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 2:42:48&#8239;PM UTC-8, Simon S Aysdie wrote: >> On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 1:55:09&#8239;PM UTC-7, bitrex wrote: >>> How is "directivity" defined for these Minicircuits gain blocks? >>> Datasheet here: >>> >>> <https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/1030/ZFL_500_2b-3305829.pdf> >>> >>> Across the bandwidth of interest I'm measuring S21 as about 20-something >>> dB give or take a dB which seems fine, S12 is at -40. >>> >>> If "directivity" in this context is just S12 then that seems within spec >>> but if it's |S21 - S12| then something seems wrong with my setup and/or >>> the amp. >>> >>> Doing the measurements on a (unfortunately not my personal home-lab >>> machine!) Keysight 5080. >> They give S-params for 2 units. Conveniently, they are in dB/angle. The table just says 38 dB, more or less for directivity. By a quick look at the S-params and comparing to the datasheet table, I think they are just saying D = |S12| (dB), which you noted. >> >> Example: >> For "unit 1" and at 100 MHz, forward gain is +24.47859 dB. >> For "unit 1" and at 100 MHz, reverse gain is -38.36183 dB. >> >> Because the "directivity" looks to be about same as |S12|, it is safe to say they mean D = |S12| (dB) >> >> !Freq S11:SOLT2(ON) S21:SOLT2(ON) S12:SOLT2(ON) S22:SOLT2(ON) >> # Hz S dB R 50 >> 100000000 -3.318152e+001 -2.120138e+001 2.447859e+001 -1.975411e+001 -3.836183e+001 -1.134106e+001 -2.672768e+001 -1.570933e+002 > > > I should say: > D = -|S12| (dB) >
(Supernews doesn't seem to be registering my 3 PM EST reply just now--apologies for duplication if it shows up eventually.) It makes no sense to take the absolute value of a quantity expressed in decibels--that's saying that there's no difference between, say, a 100X voltage amp (+40 dB) and a 40-dB attenuator (-40 dB). The directivity is just |S12 * S21|, i.e. the effects at one port of a short-circuit load reflecting all of the signal backwards through the network. In decibels, it's D = 20 log(|S12 * S21|). Symmetrical. No big mystery. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 1:12:11&#8239;PM UTC-5, bitrex wrote:
> On 11/8/2023 11:47 AM, Fred Bloggs wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 11:11:40&#8239;AM UTC-5, bitrex wrote: > >> On 11/7/2023 5:42 PM, Simon S Aysdie wrote: > >>> On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 1:55:09&#8239;PM UTC-7, bitrex wrote: > >>>> How is "directivity" defined for these Minicircuits gain blocks? > >>>> Datasheet here: > >>>> > >>>> <https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/1030/ZFL_500_2b-3305829.pdf> > >>>> > >>>> Across the bandwidth of interest I'm measuring S21 as about 20-something > >>>> dB give or take a dB which seems fine, S12 is at -40. > >>>> > >>>> If "directivity" in this context is just S12 then that seems within spec > >>>> but if it's |S21 - S12| then something seems wrong with my setup and/or > >>>> the amp. > >>>> > >>>> Doing the measurements on a (unfortunately not my personal home-lab > >>>> machine!) Keysight 5080. > >>> > >>> They give S-params for 2 units. Conveniently, they are in dB/angle. The table just says 38 dB, more or less for directivity. By a quick look at the S-params and comparing to the datasheet table, I think they are just saying D = |S12| (dB), which you noted. > >>> > >>> Example: > >>> For "unit 1" and at 100 MHz, forward gain is +24.47859 dB. > >>> For "unit 1" and at 100 MHz, reverse gain is -38.36183 dB. > >>> > >>> Because the "directivity" looks to be about same as |S12|, it is safe to say they mean D = |S12| (dB) > >>> > >>> !Freq S11:SOLT2(ON) S21:SOLT2(ON) S12:SOLT2(ON) S22:SOLT2(ON) > >>> # Hz S dB R 50 > >>> 100000000 -3.318152e+001 -2.120138e+001 2.447859e+001 -1.975411e+001 -3.836183e+001 -1.134106e+001 -2.672768e+001 -1.570933e+002 > >> Thanks Simon, yes that seems right, this amp was bang on within spec > >> otherwise so I'd have been surprised if it was way off there. > >> > >> They're nice lil modules, I didn't have this purpose in mind but I > >> wonder if they make a LNA suitable to replace the shit ass front end on > >> my DTV antenna, I live in a fringe area so reception varies by the day. > >> and I'm in a condo so mounting stuff outdoors not really feasible > > > > Your reception is probably being degraded by suboptimal antenna pointing, the sun, and unpredictable multi-path signal impingement [ coastal is littoral causes no end of propagation anomalies ]. It doesn't cost the manufacturer anything to provide a high performance front end amplifier > It doesn't? > all of which intended for satellite reception are LN-A's. The > customers pay for everything, do you think it's wise then for them to > provide junk performance parts making customers into ex-customers? > Could apply the same argument to many other industries...and conclude > all products are high-quality because otherwise the manufacturer might > lose customers.
The business is going to provide the best part suited for the application and price range. It doesn't take state-of-the-art. Your reception is problematic because of the location and other factors. Nothing by way of more expensive parts is going to fix it.
> > Hey, I have a cool idea, I'll see if I can put it on the 5080 next time > I have a chance and see how it compares to a Minicircuits gain block for > similar bandwidth, I think I can get a hold of one..