Electronics-Related.com
Forums

MOSFET Needed

Started by rhor...@gmail.com March 8, 2023
On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
<ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>:

>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >wrote: > >>PS >>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>try using your smartphone next to it... >>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >> >>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. > >I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >millivolts.
That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, or should be: few pF It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in ><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: > >>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>PS >>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>try using your smartphone next to it... >>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>> >>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >> >>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>millivolts. > >That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >or should be: > few pF > >It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit.
Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn it on. I'm guessing it won't. A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin.
On 2023-03-10 10:12, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> > wrote: > >> On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >> <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >> <ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >> >>> On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> PS >>>> about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>> try using your smartphone next to it... >>>> It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>> >>>> That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>> if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>> >>> I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>> millivolts. >> >> That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >> or should be: >> few pF >> >> It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. > > Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor > to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn > it on. I'm guessing it won't. > > A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. >
Not to mention the Miller capacitance--the stage is running at maximum voltage gain. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:18:51 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>On 2023-03-10 10:12, John Larkin wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >>> <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >>> <ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >>> >>>> On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> PS >>>>> about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>>> try using your smartphone next to it... >>>>> It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>>> >>>>> That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>>> if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>>> >>>> I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>>> millivolts. >>> >>> That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >>> or should be: >>> few pF >>> >>> It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. >> >> Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor >> to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn >> it on. I'm guessing it won't. >> >> A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. >> > >Not to mention the Miller capacitance--the stage is running at maximum >voltage gain. > >Cheers > >Phil Hobbs
All our boards have a ground plane on layer 2. I can imagine a haywire 2-layer board with a grand-tour autorouted gate trace resonating at a cell phone frequency. Don't do that.
On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:12:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
<90im0i1shrf91q085uihf98ifps19e6m8l@4ax.com>:

>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >wrote: > >>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >> >>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>PS >>>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>>try using your smartphone next to it... >>>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>> >>>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>> >>>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>>millivolts. >> >>That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >>or should be: >> few pF >> >>It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. > >Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor >to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn >it on. I'm guessing it won't. > >A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin.
Maybe you can try with your few pF scope probe next to your smartphone and your gigglehertz scope? Just call somebody...
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:01:23 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

>On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:12:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in ><90im0i1shrf91q085uihf98ifps19e6m8l@4ax.com>: > >>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >>><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >>> >>>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>PS >>>>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>>>try using your smartphone next to it... >>>>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>>> >>>>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>>> >>>>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>>>millivolts. >>> >>>That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >>>or should be: >>> few pF >>> >>>It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. >> >>Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor >>to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn >>it on. I'm guessing it won't. >> >>A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. > >Maybe you can try with your few pF scope probe next to your smartphone and your gigglehertz scope? >Just call somebody...
Of course a fast scope will see RF near a phone. But will the phone turn on a mosfet on a PC board? Lots of opamps are RF sensitive, so I'd imagine that a phone close to something sensitive, like a thermocouple front end, could cause problems. EMI-hardened opamps and diffamps are becoming common now. Our fastest realtime scope is 7 GHz. What frequencies are cell phones these days? I guess they send short bursty packets. That would be cool on a scope.
fredag den 10. marts 2023 kl. 18.33.13 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:01:23 GMT, Jan Panteltje <al...@comet.invalid> > wrote: > > >On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:12:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin > ><jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in > ><90im0i1shrf91q085...@4ax.com>: > > > >>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <al...@comet.invalid> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin > >>><jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in > >>><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6...@4ax.com>: > >>> > >>>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <al...@comet.invalid> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>PS > >>>>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: > >>>>>try using your smartphone next to it... > >>>>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. > >>>>> > >>>>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, > >>>>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. > >>>> > >>>>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to > >>>>millivolts. > >>> > >>>That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, > >>>or should be: > >>> few pF > >>> > >>>It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. > >> > >>Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor > >>to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn > >>it on. I'm guessing it won't. > >> > >>A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. > > > >Maybe you can try with your few pF scope probe next to your smartphone and your gigglehertz scope? > >Just call somebody... > Of course a fast scope will see RF near a phone. But will the phone > turn on a mosfet on a PC board? > > Lots of opamps are RF sensitive, so I'd imagine that a phone close to > something sensitive, like a thermocouple front end, could cause > problems. > > EMI-hardened opamps and diffamps are becoming common now. > > Our fastest realtime scope is 7 GHz. > > What frequencies are cell phones these days?
depends on the service and where you are in the world, but roughly 700-800-900-1800-2100-2600MHz
>I guess they send short > bursty packets.
not nearly as bad as old school GSM, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nZ-gSKWr2RI
On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:32:57 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
<vjpm0i5gkh5q7d01oo0dha1m856f805p8c@4ax.com>:

>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:01:23 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >wrote: > >>On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:12:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin >><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >><90im0i1shrf91q085uihf98ifps19e6m8l@4ax.com>: >> >>>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >>>><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >>>><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>PS >>>>>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>>>>try using your smartphone next to it... >>>>>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>>>> >>>>>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>>>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>>>> >>>>>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>>>>millivolts. >>>> >>>>That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >>>>or should be: >>>> few pF >>>> >>>>It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. >>> >>>Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor >>>to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn >>>it on. I'm guessing it won't. >>> >>>A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. >> >>Maybe you can try with your few pF scope probe next to your smartphone and your gigglehertz scope? >>Just call somebody... > >Of course a fast scope will see RF near a phone. But will the phone >turn on a mosfet on a PC board? > >Lots of opamps are RF sensitive, so I'd imagine that a phone close to >something sensitive, like a thermocouple front end, could cause >problems. > >EMI-hardened opamps and diffamps are becoming common now.
Many transistor circuits exist that make great unexpected RF detectors (base emitter). I have wondered why you do not RF decouple your walwart power input.. AT the connector. When you are a radio-ham you will notice real fast what a few hunderd - or even tens of Watts can do.
>Our fastest realtime scope is 7 GHz.
That should do.
>What frequencies are cell phones these days? I guess they send short >bursty packets. That would be cool on a scope.
From google: 698-806 MHz 700 MHz Band 806- 849 / 851- 896 MHz 800 MHz Band 1850-1910 / 1930-1990 MHz PCS Band 1710-1755 / 2110-2155 MHz AWS Band You can hear those on some FM radios too, I remeber in a train getting interference on my headplugs on my mp3 player from the guy next to me phoning, you could hear those bursts.
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 06:47:31 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

>On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:32:57 -0800) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in ><vjpm0i5gkh5q7d01oo0dha1m856f805p8c@4ax.com>: > >>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:01:23 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>On a sunny day (Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:12:59 -0800) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >>><90im0i1shrf91q085uihf98ifps19e6m8l@4ax.com>: >>> >>>>On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:28:52 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On a sunny day (Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:56:12 -0800) it happened John Larkin >>>>><jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in >>>>><ta7k0i5j95lqorlq6a41ushch2b3dss5fl@4ax.com>: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:54:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>PS >>>>>>>about that right side MOSFET with the high value series resistor in the gate: >>>>>>>try using your smartphone next to it... >>>>>>>It REALLY needs decoupling caps. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That gate input, when not in a 100% shielded housing, will react to any RF, >>>>>>>if the signal is big enough unexpected things may happen. >>>>>> >>>>>>I doubt it. Fet capacitances will keep gate RF levels down to >>>>>>millivolts. >>>>> >>>>>That M7 MOSFET with the 1M or so gate resistor is a low power MOSFET I think, >>>>>or should be: >>>>> few pF >>>>> >>>>>It forms a feeaking antenna in this circuit. >>>> >>>>Well, try it. Put a small mosfet on a PC board with a 1M gate resistor >>>>to ground, with a reasonable layout, and see if a cell phone will turn >>>>it on. I'm guessing it won't. >>>> >>>>A 2N7002 is 20 pF typical Cin. >>> >>>Maybe you can try with your few pF scope probe next to your smartphone and your gigglehertz scope? >>>Just call somebody... >> >>Of course a fast scope will see RF near a phone. But will the phone >>turn on a mosfet on a PC board? >> >>Lots of opamps are RF sensitive, so I'd imagine that a phone close to >>something sensitive, like a thermocouple front end, could cause >>problems. >> >>EMI-hardened opamps and diffamps are becoming common now. > >Many transistor circuits exist that make great unexpected RF detectors (base emitter). >I have wondered why you do not RF decouple your walwart power input.. AT the connector.
Our products generally have an EMI filter, a couple of caps and a ferrite bead, and then a polyfuse, TVS, and more caps. I don't bother to do all that on proto boards. We do have an all-facility EMI test system: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tmcpmvqp714c82o/Roof_West.JPG?raw=1
On a sunny day (Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:23:45 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
<kcap0i9kf0tuc35hnlirtoobkqj6u19fgu@4ax.com>:

>We do have an all-facility EMI test system: > >https://www.dropbox.com/s/tmcpmvqp714c82o/Roof_West.JPG?raw=1
? All I see is a roof with some boxes? Or are you referring to that antenna tower? I remember a discussion about that here some time ago. I have a similar source of RF power here, the radar station just a few km from here. https://panteltje.nl/pub/radar_2kHz_spectrum_burst.gif it works at about 1.35 GHz but sweeps over a wide band. Signal is VERY strong and interferes with satellite reception on some channels as the 1.35 GHz is in the middle of the signal from the LNB down converter.