IEEE Magnetics Society uses lawyers to prevent scientific communications.

I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.

"Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE

I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.

I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
parasites.

I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...

Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
the global technical community, including education and training of young 
engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
competency."

That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
parasitic money grab.

I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
communications allowed.

Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.

Abstract
In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
Cube Theory.

youtube video on iron's rings of protons...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck

by Alan Folmsbee

On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> 
> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> 
> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> 
> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> parasites.
> 
> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> 
> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> competency."
> 
> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> parasitic money grab.
> 
> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> communications allowed.
> 
> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> 
> Abstract
> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> Cube Theory.
> 
> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> 
> by Alan Folmsbee

I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 

Rick C. 

https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:41:34 -0800 (PST),
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com wrote:

>On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
>> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
>> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
>> 
>> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
>> 
>> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
>> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
>> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
>> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
>> 
>> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
>> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
>> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
>> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
>> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
>> parasites.
>> 
>> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
>> 
>> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
>> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
>> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
>> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
>> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
>> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
>> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
>> competency."
>> 
>> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
>> parasitic money grab.
>> 
>> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
>> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
>> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
>> communications allowed.
>> 
>> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
>> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
>> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
>> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
>> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
>> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
>> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
>> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
>> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
>> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
>> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
>> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
>> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
>> Cube Theory.
>> 
>> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
>> 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
>> 
>> by Alan Folmsbee
>
>I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
>
>Rick C. 
>
>https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code


When did magnetic properties of materials  move from the electron
orbitals to  the nucleus ?

On Sunday, November 11, 2018 at 4:12:05 PM UTC-6, boB wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:41:34 -0800 (PST),
> gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> >On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> >> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> >> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> >> 
> >> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> >> 
> >> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> >> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> >> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> >> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> >> 
> >> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> >> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> >> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> >> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> >> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> >> parasites.
> >> 
> >> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> >> 
> >> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> >> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> >> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> >> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> >> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> >> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> >> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> >> competency."
> >> 
> >> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> >> parasitic money grab.
> >> 
> >> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> >> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> >> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> >> communications allowed.
> >> 
> >> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> >> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> >> 
> >> Abstract
> >> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> >> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> >> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> >> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> >> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> >> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> >> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> >> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> >> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> >> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> >> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> >> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> >> Cube Theory.
> >> 
> >> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> >> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> >> 
> >> by Alan Folmsbee
> >
> >I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> >
> >Rick C. 
> >
> >https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code
> 
> 
> When did magnetic properties of materials  move from the electron
> orbitals to  the nucleus ?

I guess he is saying they *aren't* electronic properties, but rather nucleonic. 

Rick C.

https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code 

On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 9:12:05 AM UTC+11, boB wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:41:34 -0800 (PST),
> gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> >On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> >> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> >> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> >> 
> >> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> >> 
> >> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> >> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> >> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> >> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> >> 
> >> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> >> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> >> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> >> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> >> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> >> parasites.
> >> 
> >> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> >> 
> >> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> >> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> >> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> >> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> >> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> >> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> >> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> >> competency."
> >> 
> >> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> >> parasitic money grab.
> >> 
> >> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> >> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> >> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> >> communications allowed.
> >> 
> >> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> >> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> >> 
> >> Abstract
> >> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> >> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> >> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> >> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> >> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> >> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> >> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> >> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> >> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> >> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> >> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> >> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> >> Cube Theory.
> >> 
> >> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> >> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> >> 
> >> by Alan Folmsbee
> >
> >I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> >
> >Rick C. 
> >
> >https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code
> 
> 
> When did magnetic properties of materials  move from the electron
> orbitals to  the nucleus ?

When nuclear magnetic resonance became a popular technique?

The catch is that the nuclear magnetic moment is tiny when compared with that of the electron shell.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney 

On Sunday, November 11, 2018 at 12:12:05 PM UTC-10, boB wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:41:34 -0800 (PST),
> gnuarm.deletcom wrote:
> 
> >On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> >> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> >> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> >> 
> >> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> >> 
> >> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> >> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> >> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> >> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> >> 
> >> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> >> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> >> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> >> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> >> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> >> parasites.
> >> 
> >> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> >> 
> >> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> >> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> >> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> >> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> >> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> >> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> >> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> >> competency."
> >> 
> >> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> >> parasitic money grab.
> >> 
> >> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> >> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> >> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> >> communications allowed.
> >> 
> >> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> >> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> >> 
> >> Abstract
> >> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> >> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> >> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> >> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> >> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> >> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> >> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> >> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> >> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> >> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> >> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> >> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> >> Cube Theory.
> >> 
> >> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> >> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> >> 
> >> by Alan Folmsbee
> >
> >I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> >
> >Rick C. 
> >
> >https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code
> 
> 
> When did magnetic properties of materials  move from the electron
> orbitals to  the nucleus ?

Dear Bob, May 25, 2017.
The electrons of iron are said to have spins that are
causing ferromagnetism. The electrons of copper are said to have 
different spins compared to iron. All electrons are the same.
Iron has a different nucleus than copper. That nuclear difference is what
makes the electrons have the special spin configuration in iron
but not copper.

I discovered the shape of the iron nucleus on May 25, 2017. That was when.
The breakthrough came after attempting to use a cubic lattice
at the core of the nucleus. I doubted that a cube would be stable
but detailed evaluations of 118 elements convinced me that a cube of
3x3x3 protons and neutrons in iron is the surprising reality.

Your skepticism is natural. Old ideas die slowly until careful 
study is attempted. You will find out, slowly. Study this:
http://ferronuclear.blogspot.com/

Alan Folmsbee

gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com wrote in
news:c4546c11-6b19-4cc1-bc78-55053b93bfd3@googlegroups.com: 

> I guess he is saying they *aren't* electronic properties, but rather
> nucleonic. 
> 

Must use modern presidential pronunciations and spellings...  You left out 
the extra U...

  Nuculeonic

  Hahahahaha!

On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 10:41:39 AM UTC-10, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> > I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> > can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> > 
> > "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> > 
> > I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> > ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> > Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> > Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> > 
> > I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> > The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> > agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> > I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> > prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> > parasites.
> > 
> > I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> > 
> > Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> > technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> > presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> > the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> > engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> > all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> > Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> > competency."
> > 
> > That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> > parasitic money grab.
> > 
> > I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> > providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> > did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> > communications allowed.
> > 
> > Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> > omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> > 
> > Abstract
> > In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> > that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> > is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> > around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> > nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> > of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> > ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> > No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> > of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> > of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> > of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> > to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> > Cube Theory.
> > 
> > youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> > 
> > by Alan Folmsbee
> 
> I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> 
> Rick C. 
> 
> https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code

Dear Rick C.
Hello , 

You ask to understand why the iron nuculus shape has
anything to do with ferromagnetism. This essay explains
in more detail.

The two rings of 12 protons each remind me of a transformer.
Transformers have a primary coil and a secondary coil. That
shape enables magnetic phenomena. When I assembled the iron
model in the pyramidal cube attempt, I found two rings of
protons, so it reminded me of a transformer.

The two coaxial loops with a total of 24 protons in element 26
reminded me of a radio transmitter loop and a receiver loop
antenna. That electromagnetic phenomenon called radio implied to
me on May 25, 2017 that iron is ferromagnetic because it
has 2 coaxial rings of protons, as in the Paper you can get
from me today, 11/12/18.

The electrons around iron have spins that are mostly in one direction
without a paired electron in the opposite direction. That is because
the iron nucleus has two coaxial loops of protons. Those protons, 
when in a magnetized crystal domain, all have the same flow
directions of an internal current. That one-way flow causes
the iron electrons to spin all one way, for most of the 26
electrons.

But if you like youtube videos, see the gadolinium 2 minute show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQrYW_GPtgM

That video shows the nuculus of Gd next to carbon and iron.
The scale is 20,000,000,000,000 X. (twenty trillion).

Old science did not know the nuculus like i does. This new
learning goes beyond the electron explanation to include
the way things really work. They work without quarks.

Alan Folmsbee, Maui, USA

On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 10:48:11 AM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> On Sunday, November 11, 2018 at 12:12:05 PM UTC-10, boB wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:41:34 -0800 (PST),
> > gnuarm.deletcom wrote:
> > 
> > >On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> > >> I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> > >> can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> > >> 
> > >> "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> > >> 
> > >> I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> > >> ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> > >> Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> > >> Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> > >> 
> > >> I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> > >> The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> > >> agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> > >> I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> > >> prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> > >> parasites.
> > >> 
> > >> I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> > >> 
> > >> Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> > >> technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> > >> presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> > >> the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> > >> engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> > >> all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> > >> Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> > >> competency."
> > >> 
> > >> That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> > >> parasitic money grab.
> > >> 
> > >> I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> > >> providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> > >> did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> > >> communications allowed.
> > >> 
> > >> Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> > >> omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> > >> 
> > >> Abstract
> > >> In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> > >> that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> > >> is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> > >> around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> > >> nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> > >> of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> > >> ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> > >> No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> > >> of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> > >> of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> > >> of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> > >> to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> > >> Cube Theory.
> > >> 
> > >> youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> > >> 
> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> > >> 
> > >> by Alan Folmsbee
> > >
> > >I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> > >
> > >Rick C. 
> > >
> > >https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code
> > 
> > 
> > When did magnetic properties of materials  move from the electron
> > orbitals to  the nucleus ?
> 
> Dear Bob, May 25, 2017.
> The electrons of iron are said to have spins that are
> causing ferromagnetism. The electrons of copper are said to have 
> different spins compared to iron. All electrons are the same.
> Iron has a different nucleus than copper. That nuclear difference is what
> makes the electrons have the special spin configuration in iron
> but not copper.
> 
> I discovered the shape of the iron nucleus on May 25, 2017. That was when.
> The breakthrough came after attempting to use a cubic lattice
> at the core of the nucleus. I doubted that a cube would be stable
> but detailed evaluations of 118 elements convinced me that a cube of
> 3x3x3 protons and neutrons in iron is the surprising reality.
> 
> Your skepticism is natural. Old ideas die slowly until careful 
> study is attempted. You will find out, slowly. Study this:
> http://ferronuclear.blogspot.com/

People are skeptical mostly because you don't present any evidence of your "discovery".  You really don't even explain anything.  You claim a structure for the iron nucleus and then claim this structure is responsible for irons properties... but explain NOTHING.  

Have you ever actually explained anything regarding your theories?   I've read several of your links and I see nothing in the way of explanation, just claims. 

Rick C. 

https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code 

On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 5:43:42 PM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 10:41:39 AM UTC-10, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:31:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> > > I wrote a breakthrough paper on the ferromagnetic element iron. You 
> > > can get an unpublished copy of it by emailing me.
> > > 
> > > "Iron has two rings of protons" by Alan Folmsbee MSEE
> > > 
> > > I am a former IEEE member and I published conference papers at
> > > ISSCC and IEDM. I was on a panel at ISSCC, the International
> > > Solid State Circuits Conference. I have 16 patents assigned to 
> > > Intel, AMD, and Sun Microsystems.
> > > 
> > > I used the IEEE robotic software garbage system to submit the paper.
> > > The robot has a step for OrcID that required an author to
> > > agree to pay lawyers for any accusation those parasites provide.
> > > I did not agree to indemnify the lawyer parasites. The robot system
> > > prevents human communications unless I promise to pay lawyer
> > > parasites.
> > > 
> > > I filled out the IEEE paper submission to the Magnetics Society...
> > > 
> > > Mission: "The IEEE Magnetics Society promotes the advancement of science, 
> > > technology, applications and training in magnetism. It fosters 
> > > presentation and exchange of information among its members and within 
> > > the global technical community, including education and training of young 
> > > engineers and scientists. It seeks to nurture positive interactions between 
> > > all national and regional societies acting in the field of magnetism. The 
> > > Society maintains the highest standard of professionalism and technical 
> > > competency."
> > > 
> > > That mission statement does not mention their top priority: lawyers' 
> > > parasitic money grab.
> > > 
> > > I wrote an editor of The IEEE Magnetics Society about that, 
> > > providing the important paper. The editor, Albrecht Jander in Oregon, 
> > > did not reply. Only a robotic censor is available, with no human 
> > > communications allowed.
> > > 
> > > Dear IEEE members: you can read my paper for free by emailing
> > > omnilobe at gmail dot com. I will send the paper to you.
> > > 
> > > Abstract
> > > In this proposed theory, the nucleus of the element iron has a shape 
> > > that causes ferromagnetism. That shape also causes the stability that 
> > > is the best of all elements. The protons in iron make loop shapes 
> > > around the exterior of the nucleus. The loops are coaxial. The iron 
> > > nucleus has a cube of protons and neutrons at its core. The faces 
> > > of the cube are covered by pyramids of protons and neutrons. All 
> > > ferromagnetic elements have the coaxial loop structure like Fe. 
> > > No nonferrous elements have that shape, within tolerances. Most 
> > > of the properties of the elements are related to the geometries 
> > > of the nuclei. A new periodic table articulates the silhouettes 
> > > of elements that were compared with the structure of the iron nucleus 
> > > to be certain that all elements are consistent with the Pyramidal 
> > > Cube Theory.
> > > 
> > > youtube video on iron's rings of protons...
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_HGg0sl8ck
> > > 
> > > by Alan Folmsbee
> > 
> > I watched the video, but I didn't see any basis for your claims of the nucleonic structure you describe. 
> > 
> > Rick C. 
> > 
> > https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code
> 
> Dear Rick C.
> Hello , 
> 
> You ask to understand why the iron nuculus shape has
> anything to do with ferromagnetism. This essay explains
> in more detail.
> 
> The two rings of 12 protons each remind me of a transformer.
> Transformers have a primary coil and a secondary coil. That
> shape enables magnetic phenomena. When I assembled the iron
> model in the pyramidal cube attempt, I found two rings of
> protons, so it reminded me of a transformer.
> 
> The two coaxial loops with a total of 24 protons in element 26
> reminded me of a radio transmitter loop and a receiver loop
> antenna. That electromagnetic phenomenon called radio implied to
> me on May 25, 2017 that iron is ferromagnetic because it
> has 2 coaxial rings of protons, as in the Paper you can get
> from me today, 11/12/18.
> 
> The electrons around iron have spins that are mostly in one direction
> without a paired electron in the opposite direction. That is because
> the iron nucleus has two coaxial loops of protons. Those protons, 
> when in a magnetized crystal domain, all have the same flow
> directions of an internal current. That one-way flow causes
> the iron electrons to spin all one way, for most of the 26
> electrons.

What internal current?  Are you saying the protons are moving in this nuclear structure?  What about the rings in the structure allows the protons to move?  Do you have any math to show what is happening?  How do you determine that any element has the nuclear structure you are imagining?  Why are two loops needed to be ferromagnetic?  Why can't three loops do the same thing?  What does a "magnetized crystal domain" have to do with it (or what is that even)? 


> But if you like youtube videos, see the gadolinium 2 minute show.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQrYW_GPtgM
> 
> That video shows the nuculus of Gd next to carbon and iron.
> The scale is 20,000,000,000,000 X. (twenty trillion).

But it doesn't actually explain anything.  You glue some marbles together and tell us you have discovered new explanations for things that were explained a long time ago.  


> Old science did not know the nuculus like i does. This new
> learning goes beyond the electron explanation to include
> the way things really work. They work without quarks.

Yes, clearly you does [sic] know the nuculus [sic]. 

Rick C.

https://ts.la/richard11209 - Tesla referral code