Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:spnpda$1ngb$1@gioia.aioe.org:> On a sun ny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:43:20 -0000 (UTC)) it > happened DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in > <spnjuo$10p1$1@gioia.aioe.org>: > >>Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in >>news:spmqbi$bbo$1@gioia.aioe.org: >> >>> On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:57:56 -0000 (UTC)) it >>> happened DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in >>> <spmhl4$1kjb$1@gioia.aioe.org>: >>> >>>>Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>news:20ab8ec1-3987-4557-829a-018c6c9ece3fn@googlegroups.com: >>>> >>>>> Klaus Kragelund wrote: >>>>> =================== >>>>>> >>>>>> I can get cheap servos: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://m.aliexpress.com/item/4000903254039.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ** RC servos cannot reverse direction near fast enough for >>>>> your idea. >>>>> Small mirrors mounted on a speaker cone are far better. >>>>> The speakers could be driven with low voltage 60Hz. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ..... Phil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> There are swivel mounted mirrors out there with a coil already >>>> on >>>>them which can be modulated to hard point or oscillate the >>>>mirror angle. >>>> >>>> I used to put 'music' up on the ceiling with my HeNe laser >>>> tube, and >>>>two such mirrors. >>> >>> Yep >>> On the high end, I have an i-connect picop laser projector (size >>> of a smartphone) that projects color video using rgb lasrs and a >>> moving mirror assembly. >>> https://old.liewcf.com/i-connect-view-x-laser-pico-projector-rev >>> ie w-7276/ >>> >>> so I can project anything I want really >>> >> >> Sure... anything... except for political intelligence. In that >>realm, you're the biggest loser. >> >> Oh and "on the high end". You're not even close to the units >> the >>rock bands of the seventies used, much less what they are using >>now. > > WelI have seen lost of that stuff in the studio.Oh boy! Yer a really good stuff seer, JanTard!> And that laser videodisc, Philps asked me to write the service > manual.Oh boy! Shame it was not a phillips disc player of laser.> Sure I had the HeNeon laser too at home.You're mumbling... again, fucktard.> And then, in the seventies we had holograms,While National Geographic printed literally millions of them for the first time.> I still have one > somewhere.Oh boy!> Rock bands these days?You don't know what rock is from the stupid shit you are spewing forth with here.> Are not there only rappers these > days?You ain't a very bright racist putz, are ya, chucko?> As to politics, you failed here spectaculary.I've seen the stupid shit you post. You're a political total retard.> Now go back to yer mama for breastfeeding. > !You're a piece of shit. You came out of your whore mama's ass. They should put her in prison for failing to flush you, the moment the severely ass fucked street slut shat you.
Laser marking/directing system
Started by ●December 18, 2021
Reply by ●December 19, 20212021-12-19
Reply by ●December 19, 20212021-12-19
Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:spnpnj$1snk$1 @gioia.aioe.org:> Nothing about that in rfc977Oh, that pre-web, text only POS document. Yeah, you're right on top of modern Usenet use. You're a fucking retard, boy. Write that.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:53:04 +0100, Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:>Hi > >I am working on a project, just for my own business > >I need a laser marking system, that can show a cross hair or other visible marking on a cardboard box up to 4 meters away > >Initial thought would be class 1 laser (no approvals?) and then 2 steppers in a mechanical arrangement to provide x and y functions > >I can add a USB camera to home in the laser, so the mechanism does not need to be precise > >Any hints for the cheapest system? > >Maybe using the optical drive for a cheap projector? > >I need to be able to buy it for my own production > >Regards > >KlausYou can buy a laser module that projects crosshairs for a few dollars. There are inexpensive gimbal systems for UAV camera stabilization but I don't know if they have an adequate feedback mechanism for your purpose. They're typically BLDC motors. -- Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:39:20 -0500) it happened Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote in <fb9vrgdmvfj3rbei3k1ksi8f1ken7vh9vr@4ax.com>:>On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje ><pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:45:01 -0000 (UTC)) it happened >>DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in >><spnk1s$10p1$2@gioia.aioe.org>: >> >>>Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>news:spmqm5$fdm$1@gioia.aioe.org: >>> >>>> On a sunny day (Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:44:14 -0800 (PST)) it happened >>>> Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in >>>> <529f5bab-5701-4a58-9126-810c380d1c73n@googlegroups.com>: >>>> >>>>>Jan Panteltje puked more vomit : >>>>>============================ >>>>> >>>>>> >** RC servos cannot reverse direction near fast enough for your >>>>>> >idea. >>>>>> Wrong >>>>> >>>>>** It's 100%, totally fucking correct - you wog nut case. >>>>> >>>>>> http://panteltje.com/pub/horizontal_IR_target_tracking_4686.avi >>>>> >>>>>** dead link. >>>> >>>> No it is not. >>>> >>> >>> When you post a link in Usenet, lazy boy, you encapsulate it in >>>brackets... <link> Thusly. >> >>Nothing about that in rfc977 >>the reference I used to write this newsreader, get a clue >> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/index.html > >Yes, but RFC977 is from 1986, and was obsoleted by RFC3977, which was >later updated by RFC6048, and so on...I have rfc3977 too, not the rfc6048>Brackets are a good idea these days.Well I have seen all sort of things in Usenet, at one time people started posting in html that has stopped, binary attachements.... There is, AFAIK no standard on how to put a link. Brackets are a nuisance as links are just text and cut and paste (Linux double click) then also takes the brackets that you then have to remove. I usually put the links on an empty line I can have cut and paste remove any brackets, but thare is more than usenet links to copy. Many people do their own thing, Usenet is a free world, imposing your ideas on others is your problem, I do not HAVE to use / read it.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 12:01:48 AM UTC-8, Jan Panteltje wrote:> On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:39:20 -0500) it happened Joe Gwinn > <joeg...@comcast.net> wrote in <fb9vrgdmvfj3rbei3...@4ax.com>: > >On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje > ><pNaOnSt...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:45:01 -0000 (UTC)) it happened > >>DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote in> >>> When you post a link in Usenet, lazy boy, you encapsulate it in > >>>brackets... <link> Thusly. > >> > >>Nothing about that in rfc977 > >>the reference I used to write this newsreader, get a clue > >> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/index.html > > > >Yes, but RFC977 is from 1986, and was obsoleted by RFC3977, which was > >later updated by RFC6048, and so on... > I have rfc3977 too, not the rfc6048> >Brackets are a good idea these days. > Well I have seen all sort of things in Usenet, at one time people started posting in html > that has stopped, binary attachements.... > There is, AFAIK no standard on how to put a link.Yeah, but if you ignore RFC2549, the receive end won't know what to do, and... then your goose is cooked, as the saying goes. In communication, it's wisest to adhere to any available convention. Even if it means greek letters like pi and omega show up... or phrases in Latin that are repeated ad nauseum.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
On a sunny day (Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:22:02 -0800 (PST)) it happened whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in <64c60b9e-6509-4fb0-b5e7-de305c5dabf3n@googlegroups.com>:>On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 12:01:48 AM UTC-8, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:39:20 -0500) it happened Joe Gwinn >> <joeg...@comcast.net> wrote in <fb9vrgdmvfj3rbei3...@4ax.com>: >> >On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje >> ><pNaOnSt...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >> >>On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:45:01 -0000 (UTC)) it happened >> >>DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote in > >> >>> When you post a link in Usenet, lazy boy, you encapsulate it in >> >>>brackets... <link> Thusly. >> >> >> >>Nothing about that in rfc977 >> >>the reference I used to write this newsreader, get a clue >> >> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/index.html >> > >> >Yes, but RFC977 is from 1986, and was obsoleted by RFC3977, which was >> >later updated by RFC6048, and so on... >> I have rfc3977 too, not the rfc6048 > >> >Brackets are a good idea these days. >> Well I have seen all sort of things in Usenet, at one time people started posting in html >> that has stopped, binary attachements.... >> There is, AFAIK no standard on how to put a link. > >Yeah, but if you ignore RFC2549, the receive end won't know what to do, and... >then your goose is cooked, as the saying goes. > >In communication, it's wisest to adhere to any available convention. Even if >it means greek letters like pi and omega show up... or phrases in Latin that are repeated ad nauseum.Well did you notice most people here put the links as text without '<>'. Not only in this newsgroup but im all groups I read, Do not force crap limitation standards on others, same as was with html. If people are too dumb to download a link no need to engage with them. Usenet is free format, go by rfc. Get a good newsreader And anybody who can read and cut and paste and use Linux can use wget to get a file: wget http://panteltje.com/pub/this_is_watching_over_me_IXIMG_0746.JPG end of discussion, that downunder insulting guy is beyond help. the other slow one too. My mistake, had the filter off.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:sppd92$aqh$1@gioia.aioe.org:> Many people do their own thing, Usenet is a free world, imposing > your ideas on others is your problem, I do not HAVE to use / read > it. > >You're an abject idiot. You come here and type in English. Is English your first language? If not, you are "conforming" to a convention. That being that since most in this group use English, you get the best results from following suit, which you do. You discounting a known convention as this(yes it is, putz), is just like a retarded Trumper discounting the efficacy of masks worn indoors to stop breath clouds from happenning. You're an idiot, but a free idiot. If it were truly a free world I could freely fuck you up for being so blatantly stupid. You should be glad that it is not really as you claim. The line is called civility. You want to claim to be civil, then act civil. You want rank individualism, then you are one rank indiviual, motherfucker. As in you stink, boy.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:sppmmc$rch$1 @gioia.aioe.org:> Do not force crap limitation standards on others,Your whore mother forced a CRAP piece of shit (you) on the world when she failed to flush you. She forced a crap limitation on others. She should go to prison. "limitation"? You really are a complete fucking idiot.
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:sppmmc$rch$1 @gioia.aioe.org:> end of discussion,This panjan retard ran off. What a pussy. Hey JanPanTardje, you're a pussified dumbfuck who got caught with your "I follow conventions" pants down. Once caught, instead of LEARNING, you still bark out childish baby bullshit. Good, job, pussified putz! NOT! Just like Trump and his Trumpers. How did you get so fucking Trumplike stupid way over there, boy?
Reply by ●December 20, 20212021-12-20
On 20/12/2021 08:54, Jan Panteltje wrote:> On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:39:20 -0500) it happened Joe Gwinn > <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote in <fb9vrgdmvfj3rbei3k1ksi8f1ken7vh9vr@4ax.com>: > >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:56 GMT, Jan Panteltje >> <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On a sunny day (Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:45:01 -0000 (UTC)) it happened >>> DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in >>> <spnk1s$10p1$2@gioia.aioe.org>: >>> >>>> Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> news:spmqm5$fdm$1@gioia.aioe.org: >>>>>>>> When you post a link in Usenet, lazy boy, you encapsulate it in >>>> brackets... <link> Thusly. >>> >>> Nothing about that in rfc977 >>> the reference I used to write this newsreader, get a clue >>> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/index.html >> >> Yes, but RFC977 is from 1986, and was obsoleted by RFC3977, which was >> later updated by RFC6048, and so on... > > I have rfc3977 too, not the rfc6048 > >> Brackets are a good idea these days. > > Well I have seen all sort of things in Usenet, at one time people started posting in html > that has stopped, binary attachements.... > There is, AFAIK no standard on how to put a link.There /is/ a standard - you put < > brackets around the link. It has been the standard of Usenet and email for a long time (probably since email and the web left the realms of universities and technical users, and became popular with the great unwashed). Every decent client program understands < > around a link to ensure that it works correctly regardless of where the text line breaks go.> Brackets are a nuisance as links are just text and cut and paste (Linux double click) > then also takes the brackets that you then have to remove.Bracketed links are single-click from any decent newsreader on Linux.> I usually put the links on an empty line > I can have cut and paste remove any brackets, but thare is more than usenet links to copy. > Many people do their own thing, Usenet is a free world, imposing your ideas on others is your problem, > I do not HAVE to use / read it. > >This newsgroup is a fine testament to people writing exactly what they want with a total disregard for anyone else. But if you want people to follow your links, then it is best to follow the standards.
