Electronics-Related.com
Forums

OT: topic

Started by Rich S November 23, 2021
On 11/23/2021 5:11 PM, John Robertson wrote:
> For example, one problem I am looking for a solution is trying to read old > single CHIP CPUs such as the Signetics/Philips MAB84XX series of chips. I know > the ROM is embedded in the chip and can't normally be gotten at, I'm thinking > thought that there is a rare document floating around that would show how to > verify the ROM/RAM code by sending some signal in the T (est) pin-Input pin,
Are you sure that's not the T(imer) I/O pin?
> testable using the JT1 or JNT1 instructions, whatever those are! Not covered in > any documents I've found so far though. I've found these so far which aren't bad:
Some old devices allow "program verify" to be performed from the pins (e.g., the venerable 8048, et al.). These will gladly "dump" their contents if asked to do so. (you have to be careful about what bit of kit you *expect* to be able to do this; some will gladly toast the part for you!) Other devices were (are!) designed with the intent to make this "impossible". (AFAICT, all have failed -- but in different ways!). There are firms that will do this for you -- for a fee, of course. Or, a precocious university student. Aside from devices that were designed with the INTENDED ability to dump their contents, most others require a fair bit of "hacking" (i.e., thus, a financial incentive). Folks who do it "professionally", develop a "book of tricks" for different devices, attack vectors, etc. [I was actively involved in such Red/Blue team efforts years ago. It's an interesting mindset. And, worthwhile skills developed to help *protect* designs. But, on the whole, trying to copy other designs is *so* uninteresting when contrasted with creating new...] It's usually a lot easier (for small processors/applications) to just reimplement the functionality in whatever device you choose. But, that's not cheap, either (the advantage being you now have a design that YOU own and can augment -- so "yours" is better than the original!)