Forums

OT anii-gun activist murdrerer

Started by Unknown October 22, 2021
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 4:59:41 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote: > > On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 5:03:05 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote: > >> bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: > >> > On 10/22/2021 11:03 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >> >> > >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-fi > > lm-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >> >> > >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > > > >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >> > > >> > I think the last fatality that occurred on a big-budget picture was ove > > r > >> > 25 years ago. > >> > > >> > Anyway, the "ruling class" in America is solidly right-wing. Otherwise > > > >> > there would've probably been a universal health care system by now... > > > >> > > >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >> >> > >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > >> >> movies. > >> > > >> > Yes, they know their audience, and there are definitely not enough > >> > Godless leftists to keep them in business alone. Why do I wanna watch a > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > > >> > >> Typical cannibal leftist justifications when pointing out the FACT > >> Hollywood rails against guns while it promotes guns like nobody else. > > > > It makes movies that people will pay money to watch. The American gun-manufacturing business has spent a lot of money on brain-washing the American population to the point where half the house-holds in America have a gun, which is most likely to be used by it's owner for gun suicide, with the murder of a partner being the next most likely use. The gun manufacturing business spends a lot of money popularising the idea that household gun is useful for home defense, which it is - very occasionally - but nowhere near enough to compensate for the damage done when householders go out of their minds and shoot themselves or their nearest and dearest. > > > > In a culture where people think about guns a lot, the entertainment industry can make a lot money out of making films about guns being used - it piggy-backs on the gun-manufacturing industry advertising > > > >> The cannibal left is chock-full of HYPOCRITES... > > > > Hollywood is chock-full of people who will exploit any opportunity to make money. By and large they aren't leftists, but they do hire a lot of people who are more left-wing than they are (which isn't all that left-wing). >
<snip> John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. When a dog craps on the sidewalk, it does it because it is full of shit. John Doe does seem to have the same problem. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Fuckwit  bill....@ieee.org wrote:
======================
> > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally.
** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about.
> John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier.
** That don't make it irrelevant. I means YOU cannot answer it honestly. John won a very long ago. ..... Phil
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 1:27:49 AM UTC-7, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
>,,,bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about.
Not required reading.
> > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. > ** That don't make it irrelevant.
No, but randomness does.
> I means YOU cannot answer it honestly. > John won a very long ago.
Answer WHAT? There's no question presented, after all the snipping. Any 'win' means there's a prize. What's the prize? What kind of contest do you think this is? In discussion, the best prize is always clearly stated. Otherwise, the discussion is worthless to all concerned. Ability, honesty, irrelevance, are mentioned above, with zero context. Randomness, however (my little addition) is evident.
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 7:27:49 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> Fuckwit bill....@ieee.org wrote: > ====================== > > > > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about.
That line was posted by bitrex, not me.
> > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. > > ** That don't make it irrelevant.
John Doe clearly doesn't think so. There are more rational opinions, but yours won't be one of them.
> I means YOU cannot answer it honestly.
Phil has some very stupid ideas.
> John won a very long ago.
As judged by Phil, who does seem to pick winners by a process that makes him feel good, without paying much attention to reality. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
 whit3rd wrote:
===============
> > > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about. > > Not required reading.
** You lose - shithead.
> > > > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. >> > > ** That don't make it irrelevant.
> > I means YOU cannot answer it honestly
> > John won a very long ago.
> > Answer WHAT?
** The criticism of Bill he posts over an over - SHITHEAD It's spot on.
> Any 'win' means there's a prize
** Childish drivel. You must still believe in the Tooth Fairy Or else you ARE one. ...... Phil
Fuckwit Retard Bill Slowman 

 ====================== 
> > > > > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > > > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about. > That line was posted by bitrex, not me.
** You need to do it too.
> > > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. > > > > ** That don't make it irrelevant.
> John Doe clearly doesn't think so.
> Nor does anyone else here - fuckhead.
> > I means YOU cannot answer it honestly. > Phil has some very stupid ideas.
** I win again - this is toooo easy.
> > John won a very long ago. > > As judged by Phil
** A very good judge of lying pricks like you. Another win - this to going fine. ..... Phil
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > > Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > > Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > > Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > movies. > > > > -- > > Father Brown's figure remained quite dark and still; > but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was > always most valuable when he had lost it.
You have to break a few eggs to make an omelet.
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 10:26:50 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> Fuckwit Retard Bill Slowman > ====================== > > > > > > > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > > > > > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about. > > That line was posted by bitrex, not me. > ** You need to do it too.
Not really. It was mentioned in the Sydney Morning Herald, and despite your bizarre ideas on the subject, it is totally irrelevant to the point I was making, which does seem to be beyond your feeble comprehension.
> > > > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. > > > > > > ** That don't make it irrelevant. > > > John Doe clearly doesn't think so. > > > Nor does anyone else here - fuckhead.
You can't read? That makes sense - the claim doesn't.
> > > I means YOU cannot answer it honestly. > > > Phil has some very stupid ideas. > > ** I win again - this is toooo easy.
If you are the judge and the whole of the jury it is pretty easy to decide that you have won. You need a split personality to carry it off, but yours seems to qualify.
> > > John won a very long ago. > > > > As judged by Phil. > > ** A very good judge of lying pricks like you.
In his own idiosyncratic opinion.
> Another win - this to going fine.
Well enough to have you carried away in straight jacket? We can hope that the prize for all this winning is a couple of months of free accomodationat a the funny farm - a more generous prize than you deserve, but it has side-benefits for the rest of us. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
 Fuckwit Retard Bill Slowman 
 ====================== 
> > > > > > > >> > movie about some old-timey gunslingers? I have no interest personally. > > > > > > > > ** FFS look up what the movie "Rust" is actually about. > > > > That line was posted by bitrex, not me. > > ** You need to do it too.
<
> Not really.
** You fucking well do - arsehole. I win again.
> > > > > John Doe hasn't got anything useful to say so it posts a collection of irrelevant stuff that it has posted earlier. > > > > > > > > ** That don't make it irrelevant. > > > > > John Doe clearly doesn't think so. > > > > > Nor does anyone else here - fuckhead. > > You can't read? That makes sense - the claim doesn't.
** You get NO say in that as you are the culprit.
> > > > I means YOU cannot answer it honestly. > > > > > Phil has some very stupid ideas. > > > > ** I win again - this is toooo easy. > > If you are the judge.....
** I am a long time expert on NG answers from trolls like you. > > > John won a very long ago.
> > > > > > As judged by Phil. > > > > ** A very good judge of lying pricks like you. > > In his own idiosyncratic opinion.
** Another win to me.
> Well enough to have you carried away in straight jacket?
** Third time lucky - you sad, sick, lying POS. Everyone here has you pegged as a demented lump of " dead wood" and a vile troll. I win again. ...... Phil
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id 
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Sat, 23 Oct 2021 05:49:18 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <sl07ot$lpo$2@dont-email.me>. tFJpMVYOWqjs