Forums

OT anii-gun activist murdrerer

Started by Unknown October 22, 2021
On 10/22/2021 2:09 PM, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 2:03:05 PM UTC-4, John Doe wrote: >> Typical cannibal leftist justifications when pointing out the FACT >> Hollywood rails against guns while it promotes guns like nobody else. >> >> The cannibal left is chock-full of HYPOCRITES... > > Exactly. How the hell else are they going to enrich themselves and make tons of money without feeding the crowd exactly what they want to see and how they see it. Big productions have every bit of their plots, actions dialogue, you name it, thoroughly scrutinized and analyzed by psychologists before they even start.
Doe the type of guy to watch a Hollywood picture five times just to make sure how degenerate it all was, and become the expert on telling other people what a bunch of degenerates they are for making this film he watched five times.
fredag den 22. oktober 2021 kl. 22.24.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >> >> > >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >> >> > >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >> >> > >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > >> >> movies. > >> > > >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > >> > > >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. > >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. > >> > >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more > >> people. > > > >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. > > > >> > Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who > died and then injured the guy.
I doubt a paper wad would do more than hurt. When Brandon Lee was killed in a similar type of accident a bullet from a dummy round used in one scene had gotten stuck in the barrel, so when the gun was used with blank rounds in another scene it was like a live round even if antigun, if you have to be around guns and work with guns it is a good idea to learn some basic firearms safety...
On 2021-10-22 21:53, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:18:06 +0200, Jeroen Belleman > <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: > >> On 2021-10-22 18:50, Corvid wrote: >>> On 10/22/21 8:03 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >>>> >>>> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico >>>> >>>> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death >>>> is just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. >>>> >>>> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. >>>> >>>> Money talks, I guess. >>> >>> And Hollywood is really all about money, not guns. >> >> >> Hollywood is weird. The whole American film industry is >> weird. Any amount of violence is acceptable, but showing >> a nipple is taboo. Weird. >> >> Jeroen Belleman > > The audience is international. Some countries won't allow female flesh > to be shown in movies.
"Some countries" includes the USA.
> > And there are language/culture barriers. Violence is universal.
So is nudity, so is sex. That can't be the reason. Jeroen Belleman
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 10:03:31 AM UTC-5, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > > Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > > Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > > Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > movies. > > > > -- > > Father Brown's figure remained quite dark and still; > but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was > always most valuable when he had lost it.
The good guy usually wins. Plus, he gets the pretty girl if there's one around.
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 1:24:18 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >> >> > >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >> >> > >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >> >> > >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > >> >> movies. > >> > > >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > >> > > >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. > >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. > >> > >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more > >> people. > > > >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. > > > >> > Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who > died and then injured the guy. > -- > > If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, > but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. > Francis Bacon
The news says a "single round" was fired - while a blank can severely injure you at close range, it is not going to travel thru your body and seriously injure another. This set was beleaguered with safety problems. This movie production was a safety nightmare: how do you allow ANY live rounds on the set at all? And if you do need live rounds for certain shoots, why were they not secured in a separate, locked area that only the armorer had access to? Alec "The Jerk" Baldwin is a big union supporter - for OTHER COMPANIES! He fired his union crew and replaced them with nonunion workers. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-10-22/alec-baldwin-rust-camera-crew-walked-off-set I wonder if the armorer was one of those that was fired by The Jerk. I also wonder WHOM The Jerk is going to blame for this accident.
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 4:24:18 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >> >> > >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >> >> > >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >> >> > >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > >> >> movies. > >> > > >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > >> > > >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. > >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. > >> > >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more > >> people. > > > >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. > > > >> > Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who > died and then injured the guy.
Whatever it was it had some spread on it. Another possibility is that something in that gun barrel disintegrated and let loose with metal fragments. There are all sorts of accessory add-ons available to achieve various effects. Or it could have been something as simple as a cartridge fragmented and left bits in the barrel, in front of the chamber, to be propelled at high speed by the succeeding blank. Maybe it was something along those lines. Pointing a gun at a person in those circumstances should just feel very wrong to a reasonably sane person, and that's why it's just not done.
> -- > > If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, > but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. > Francis Bacon
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 6:01:28 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 1:24:18 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > > <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: > > >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > > >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > > >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > > >> >> > > >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > > >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > > >> >> > > >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > > >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > > >> >> > > >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > > >> >> movies. > > >> > > > >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > > >> > > > >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. > > >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. > > >> > > >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more > > >> people. > > > > > >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. > > > > > >> > > Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who > > died and then injured the guy. > > -- > > > > If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, > > but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. > > Francis Bacon > The news says a "single round" was fired - while a blank can severely injure you at close range, it is not going to travel thru your body and seriously injure another. > > This set was beleaguered with safety problems. This movie production was a safety nightmare: how do you allow ANY live rounds on the set at all? And if you do need live rounds for certain shoots, why were they not secured in a separate, locked area that only the armorer had access to? > > Alec "The Jerk" Baldwin is a big union supporter - for OTHER COMPANIES! He fired his union crew and replaced them with nonunion workers. > https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-10-22/alec-baldwin-rust-camera-crew-walked-off-set > I wonder if the armorer was one of those that was fired by The Jerk. I also wonder WHOM The Jerk is going to blame for this accident.
Cinematographer was from Ukraine. Those people make movies with live rounds all the time. They don't know what a blank is. And you don't want to know how they use dynamite, but it gets really close to the players.
John Larkin wrote:
==============
> > Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. >
** The likely scenario right now. The problem here is that "dummy" rounds and live ones may look just the same. Film sets are notoriously dangerous places, like construction sites but worse. Everything is done to a tight schedule, safety wastes time and costs money. There is a prevailing " show must go on" reckless mentality. Film people think they are *special* and can break laws at whim to get a needed shot. Their arrogance is astounding so sometimes " shit happens " . ...... Phil
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 2:16:28 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
> On 2021-10-22 21:53, John Larkin wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:18:06 +0200, Jeroen Belleman > > <jer...@nospam.please> wrote: > > > >> On 2021-10-22 18:50, Corvid wrote: > >>> On 10/22/21 8:03 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >>>> > >>>> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >>>> > >>>> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death > >>>> is just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >>>> > >>>> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >>>> > >>>> Money talks, I guess. > >>> > >>> And Hollywood is really all about money, not guns. > >> > >> > >> Hollywood is weird. The whole American film industry is > >> weird. Any amount of violence is acceptable, but showing > >> a nipple is taboo. Weird. > >> > >> Jeroen Belleman > > > > The audience is international. Some countries won't allow female flesh > > to be shown in movies. > "Some countries" includes the USA.
It must have been decades since you've been to the movies.
> > > > And there are language/culture barriers. Violence is universal. > So is nudity, so is sex. That can't be the reason.
You just contradicted yourself.
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
<langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

>fredag den 22. oktober 2021 kl. 22.24.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin: >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs >> >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >> >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico >> >> >> >> >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is >> >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. >> >> >> >> >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is >> >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. >> >> >> >> >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future >> >> >> movies. >> >> > >> >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. >> >> > >> >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. >> >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. >> >> >> >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more >> >> people. >> > >> >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. >> > >> >> >> Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who >> died and then injured the guy. > >I doubt a paper wad would do more than hurt.
I was just being silly.
> >When Brandon Lee was killed in a similar type of accident a bullet from a dummy round used in one scene >had gotten stuck in the barrel, so when the gun was used with blank rounds in another scene it was like a live round > >even if antigun, if you have to be around guns and work with guns it is a good idea to learn some basic firearms safety...
-- If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. Francis Bacon