The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:59:42 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <skuu6d$ij5$6@dont-email.me>. aaJHtC/bLjFQ
OT anii-gun activist murdrerer
Started by ●October 22, 2021
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:27:09 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <skuvps$ij5$10@dont-email.me>. Cq53L3lQB2mi
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:02:59 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <skuucj$ij5$7@dont-email.me>. 8poSVRPir6kM
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:39:43 AM UTC-7, Edward Hernandez wrote:> The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id > <sdhn7c$pkp$4...@dont-email.me>: > > > The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post... > > And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id > <sg3kr7$qt5$1...@dont-email.me>: > > > The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > > CLUELESS... > > And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another > incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:27:09 -0000 > (UTC) in message-id <skuvps$ij5$1...@dont-email.me>. > > Cq53L3lQB2miEddie Hernia must be dyslexic: he posted the same garbage THREE TIMES!
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:>On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future >> movies. > >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance.Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more people. -- If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. Francis Bacon
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:18:06 +0200, Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:>On 2021-10-22 18:50, Corvid wrote: >> On 10/22/21 8:03 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >>> >>> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico >>> >>> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death >>> is just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. >>> >>> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. >>> >>> Money talks, I guess. >> >> And Hollywood is really all about money, not guns. > > >Hollywood is weird. The whole American film industry is >weird. Any amount of violence is acceptable, but showing >a nipple is taboo. Weird. > >Jeroen BellemanThe audience is international. Some countries won't allow female flesh to be shown in movies. And there are language/culture barriers. Violence is universal. They hardly make serious or romantic movies any more. It's all cartoon "action" and "thriller" movies with primitive emotion and sick levels of sadism and violence and preposterous costumes and physics. Kung-fu movies blatantly violate conservation of momentum. -- If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. Francis Bacon
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On 10/22/2021 2:02 PM, John Doe wrote:> Typical cannibal leftist justifications when pointing out the FACT > Hollywood rails against guns while it promotes guns like nobody else. > > The cannibal left is chock-full of HYPOCRITES... >Doe stopped being able to distinguish fantasy from reality a while back.
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs > <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: > >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico > >> > >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is > >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. > >> > >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is > >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. > >> > >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future > >> movies. > > > >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. > > > >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. > Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. > > Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more > people.Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was.> > -- > > If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, > but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. > Francis Bacon
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On 10/22/2021 2:22 PM, John Doe wrote:> Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote: > >> John Doe wrote: > >>> Typical cannibal leftist justifications when pointing out the FACT >>> Hollywood rails against guns while it promotes guns like nobody else. >>> >>> The cannibal left is chock-full of HYPOCRITES... >> >> Exactly. How the hell else are they going to enrich themselves and make >> tons of money without feeding the crowd exactly what they want to see >> and how they see it. > > It's called "taking the lead". They collaborate, exactly the same way they > flagrantly alienate half of our country NOW. Money is not their only > motive. >They figuratively alienate half the country, who still buy their product all the time. Who's going to see a picture about old-timey gunslingers, inter sectional feminists? Is that their favorite genre
Reply by ●October 22, 20212021-10-22
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:>On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 3:46:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >> >> https://www.npr.org/2021/10/21/1048246249/woman-killed-alec-baldwin-film-prop-firearm-new-mexico >> >> >> >> Hollywood is all about guns. The occasional on-set shooting death is >> >> just normal overhead. Hypocrisy of the ruling class. >> >> >> >> Our local newspaper is anti-gun, and the entertainment section is >> >> packed with ads featuring movie stars pointing guns. >> >> >> >> Money talks, I guess. I wonder if Baldwin will shoot guns in future >> >> movies. >> > >> >Learn the difference between homicide and murder. Murder is a subset of homicide. >> > >> >The scene must have called for a closeup of Baldwin firing the weapon right into the camera, or close to it. The blast could have blown something loose from the camera assembly and into the victims. That's not likely to be something they would test out in advance. >> Yes, he shot at the camera. No, the victims were hit by a real bullet. >> >> Baldwin's movies, glorifying violence, have no doubt killed many more >> people. > >Nowhere does the news say a real bullet was involved. They do say the police are still trying to figure out what the projectile was. > >>Good point. Maybe a paper wad went went clean through the lady who died and then injured the guy. -- If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts, but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. Francis Bacon
