Forums

OT: the Durham investigation still continues

Started by John Doe October 7, 2021
"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bill Sloman) 

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bozo paraphrased) 

The chronic liar Bozo Bill accusing someone else of "senile dementia" is
OBVIOUS projection... 

-- 
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20a1:: with SMTP id 1mr52037123qvd.29.1637132267094; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:47 -0800 (PST) > X-Received: by 2002:a25:db04:: with SMTP id g4mr14755760ybf.196.1637132266807; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:46 -0800 (PST) > Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:46 -0800 (PST) > In-Reply-To: <c5a9ec65-18ef-4e6b-8c0e-ad6642ace77bn@googlegroups.com> > Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.213.69.109; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi- > NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.213.69.109 > References: <sjn7up$v8g$1@dont-email.me> <fd678ec4-1d0d-4dcc-a7c0-2433b014b39an@googlegroups.com> <71c95983-9226-45b5-8427-b1651dafeac4n@googlegroups.com> <527d0fa5-44ff-46a7-bbd8-f0c58877712dn@googlegroups.com> <2bd841da-5b18-4776-ae7b-091e291e43dcn@googlegroups.com> <e66fb4b4-4035-44a6-a28e-f8b62a157485n@googlegroups.com> <f7800ee4-ff47-4250-b4f0-4d5a9bf5480cn@googlegroups.com> <0a55da8d-aae6-4073-887c-5e49660842een@googlegroups.com> <8da38219-5a13-4886-9455-fd145cf06a68n@googlegroups.com> <68186f2b-7c22-41db-8e1f-bc007b4a3f90n@googlegroups.com> <6e49b80f-fda7-4a6e-92e0-4431c68e2298n@googlegroups.com> <3e29e19c-02c9-4278-b39d-546e4a862b64n@googlegroups.com> <eda341d2-584f-4698-a610-625b2f7004e2n@googlegroups.com> <dee12b28-4b1e-4e4c-9085-bd7ff9c53b5cn@googlegroups.com> <4ad76828-d33e-47ad-bd23-11f54acd918bn@googlegroups.com> <c5b8b869-352f-480d-b836-caf71791b858n@googlegroups.com> <ac2fa98d-6cdc-4ee1-8d8c-6a4e8ca93c08n@googlegroups.com> <6d445257-d10f-4c55-953f-217ea1447839n@googlegroups.com> <311b8777-713b-4eeb-8377-c4e5417563e4n@googlegroups.com> <879645a1-321d-4a83-8e1c-d011616ed76bn@googlegroups.com> <837e0dcd-2bb0-4f06-918c-a02bddf312c0n@googlegroups.com> <59a026ed-7ffb-48ab-a887-84c99ea72acbn@googlegroups.com> <1bf27e93-0d83-4fb7-a5a9-cbbb216a6c5dn@googlegroups.com> <6b1d24c5-e259-43c4-aed1-1ee95556749bn@googlegroups.com> <7b5c5191-725f-4ac1-9a34-203b92c0bac2n@googlegroups.com> <4fea7bba-0914-4171-8a48-ff13621a2ef4n@googlegroups.com> <30bc6cfe-49ce-49e9-a01b-2787468134bfn@googlegroups.com> <c5a9ec65-18ef-4e6b-8c0e-ad6642ace77bn@googlegroups.com> > User-Agent: G2/1.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <3114d05a-68fb-4d5b-89e5-59cf38ae546dn@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: OT: the Durham investigation still continues > From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> > Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:57:47 +0000 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Lines: 144 > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:652686 > > Tom Seim wrote:
>> LOL! Hey Sloman, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after >> which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiots assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Sydney >
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 6:31:27 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:

> -- > Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote: > > X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20a1:: with SMTP id 1mr52037123qvd.29.1637132267094; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:47 -0800 (PST) > > X-Received: by 2002:a25:db04:: with SMTP id g4mr14755760ybf.196.1637132266807; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:46 -0800 (PST) > > Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail > > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design > > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:57:46 -0800 (PST) > > In-Reply-To: <c5a9ec65-18ef-4e6b...@googlegroups.com> > > Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.213.69.109; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi- > > NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.213.69.109 > > References: <sjn7up$v8g$1...@dont-email.me> <fd678ec4-1d0d-4dcc...@googlegroups.com> <71c95983-9226-45b5...@googlegroups.com> <527d0fa5-44ff-46a7...@googlegroups.com> <2bd841da-5b18-4776...@googlegroups.com> <e66fb4b4-4035-44a6...@googlegroups.com> <f7800ee4-ff47-4250...@googlegroups.com> <0a55da8d-aae6-4073...@googlegroups.com> <8da38219-5a13-4886...@googlegroups.com> <68186f2b-7c22-41db...@googlegroups.com> <6e49b80f-fda7-4a6e...@googlegroups.com> <3e29e19c-02c9-4278...@googlegroups.com> <eda341d2-584f-4698...@googlegroups.com> <dee12b28-4b1e-4e4c...@googlegroups.com> <4ad76828-d33e-47ad...@googlegroups.com> <c5b8b869-352f-480d...@googlegroups.com> <ac2fa98d-6cdc-4ee1...@googlegroups.com> <6d445257-d10f-4c55...@googlegroups.com> <311b8777-713b-4eeb...@googlegroups.com> <879645a1-321d-4a83...@googlegroups.com> <837e0dcd-2bb0-4f06...@googlegroups.com> <59a026ed-7ffb-48ab...@googlegroups.com> <1bf27e93-0d83-4fb7...@googlegroups.com> <6b1d24c5-e259-43c4...@googlegroups.com> <7b5c5191-725f-4ac1...@googlegroups.com> <4fea7bba-0914-4171...@googlegroups.com> <30bc6cfe-49ce-49e9...@googlegroups.com> <c5a9ec65-18ef-4e6b...@googlegroups.com> > > User-Agent: G2/1.0 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Message-ID: <3114d05a-68fb-4d5b...@googlegroups.com> > > Subject: Re: OT: the Durham investigation still continues > > From: Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> > > Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:57:47 +0000 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Lines: 144 > > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:652686 > > > > Tom Seim wrote: > > >> LOL! Hey Sloman, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after > >> which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiots assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could.
<sniped the usual drivel>
> accusing someone else of "senile dementia" is OBVIOUS projection...
If you are a silly as John Doe is, I suppose that you could think that, but John Doe was probably born demented. Nothing in his output suggests that he could ever have convincingly claimed to know anything. Tom Seim occasionally makes pilot-like noises - he knew what terminal velocity was, even though he didn't seem to know that it was size dependent. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id 
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:31:21 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <sn2b49$s3e$1@dont-email.me>. This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even follow it's own rules that it uses to troll other posters. m91R+h2LGtL9
On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, HOW do we know WHO THE HELL YOU ARE? You CLAIM to be Bill Sloman, but you could be just appropriating someone else's identity for all we know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am, I've been doing it here for some twenty-odd years now. You haven't got enough sense to be able track down the links that make it fairly obvious that I am the same person I was twenty-odd years ago, and there's no point in trying to spell it out for you - you clearly are an idiot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >So, don't go BOASTING that you are some person in OZ that you just looked up in the phone book or in elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who published the scientific papers that I have, and has his name on a couple of patents. You are remarkably dim, even for a Trump supporter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://site.ieee.org/nsw/committe/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've even got my photo on the NSW IEEE web-site, and I edit their news-letter, where my e-mail address is the same one you can see here. IEEE email addresses are unique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://site.ieee.org/nsw/files/2021/10/Circuit_October_2021-2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, your appropriation of someone else's identity, Bill Sloman, is dispicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably meant despicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to find that poor fellow and APOLOGIZE and hope he doesn't sue you! > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom S. hasn't realised that IEEE e-mail addresses really are unique. I "appropriated" the identity back around 1980 when I joined the IEEE. The people who supported my application were colleagues from EMI Central Research in the UK. I'd had to get a security clearance to work there, which took a while to come through I'd been cleared to "most secret" when I was working in Australia, which had got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. The IEEE didn't offer the e-mail aliasing service until the 1990's and I took advantage of it fairly early - if after I started posting stuff in sci.electronics.design. > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to post stuff here I have to log in to Google with my IEEE login about once a week - the IEEE subcontracted the e-mail aliasing and the rest of their security to Google a few years ago. It's not an "identity" that it would be easy to appropriate, not that you'd have clue about that. > > > > > > > > > > Come to think of it, that's also the login I use to get at my "23 and me" genome data. When I got them to sequence my genome, the first reaction I got back pointed out that they had the genome of my nephew (the one who works for Google in Australia). His siblings and my younger brother had used https://www.ancestry.com.au/. > > > > > > > > > > That means that I've appropriated my own identity right down to my genome sequence. If somebody else sent in a buccal swab from me, "23 and me" would tell me that I had an identical twin. "Ancenstry,com.au" would tell my brother's family that he had a sibling, and the kids had an uncle. > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, likely story - you are a fraud and we know it: who the hell knows who receives emails at that address. > > > > > > Actually the fraud here is Tom Seim. He knows so little about computer security that he can't recognise a robust system when it is described to him. > > > > > > He does have a habit of claiming to know about stuff that he clearly hasn't got a clue about. Now that he is claiming to post under his real name we can expect to see a pilot's license for the same name some time soon. The problem of proving that it is his real name, and that he is the Tom Seim named on the document will take quite a lot more discussion. I was publishing scientific papers (and getting the occasional patent) under my real name some twenty years before there was an internet. > > > > LOL! Hey Sloman, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiots assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, it is clear that you ARE an idiot and can't do a simple search! BTW, you need to have someone look into your STUTTERING! And what the hell did you do with Bill Sloman's body, anyhow?
On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, HOW do we know WHO THE HELL YOU ARE? You CLAIM to be Bill Sloman, but you could be just appropriating someone else's identity for all we know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am, I've been doing it here for some twenty-odd years now. You haven't got enough sense to be able track down the links that make it fairly obvious that I am the same person I was twenty-odd years ago, and there's no point in trying to spell it out for you - you clearly are an idiot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >So, don't go BOASTING that you are some person in OZ that you just looked up in the phone book or in elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who published the scientific papers that I have, and has his name on a couple of patents. You are remarkably dim, even for a Trump supporter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://site.ieee.org/nsw/committe/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've even got my photo on the NSW IEEE web-site, and I edit their news-letter, where my e-mail address is the same one you can see here. IEEE email addresses are unique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://site.ieee.org/nsw/files/2021/10/Circuit_October_2021-2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, your appropriation of someone else's identity, Bill Sloman, is dispicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably meant despicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to find that poor fellow and APOLOGIZE and hope he doesn't sue you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom S. hasn't realised that IEEE e-mail addresses really are unique. I "appropriated" the identity back around 1980 when I joined the IEEE. The people who supported my application were colleagues from EMI Central Research in the UK. I'd had to get a security clearance to work there, which took a while to come through I'd been cleared to "most secret" when I was working in Australia, which had got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. The IEEE didn't offer the e-mail aliasing service until the 1990's and I took advantage of it fairly early - if after I started posting stuff in sci.electronics.design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to post stuff here I have to log in to Google with my IEEE login about once a week - the IEEE subcontracted the e-mail aliasing and the rest of their security to Google a few years ago. It's not an "identity" that it would be easy to appropriate, not that you'd have clue about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Come to think of it, that's also the login I use to get at my "23 and me" genome data. When I got them to sequence my genome, the first reaction I got back pointed out that they had the genome of my nephew (the one who works for Google in Australia). His siblings and my younger brother had used https://www.ancestry.com.au/. > > > > > > > > > > > > That means that I've appropriated my own identity right down to my genome sequence. If somebody else sent in a buccal swab from me, "23 and me" would tell me that I had an identical twin. "Ancenstry,com.au" would tell my brother's family that he had a sibling, and the kids had an uncle. > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, likely story - you are a fraud and we know it: who the hell knows who receives emails at that address. > > > > > > > > Actually the fraud here is Tom Seim. He knows so little about computer security that he can't recognise a robust system when it is described to him. > > > > > > > > He does have a habit of claiming to know about stuff that he clearly hasn't got a clue about. Now that he is claiming to post under his real name we can expect to see a pilot's license for the same name some time soon. The problem of proving that it is his real name, and that he is the Tom Seim named on the document will take quite a lot more discussion. I was publishing scientific papers (and getting the occasional patent) under my real name some twenty years before there was an internet. > > > > > > LOL! Hey Sloman, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiot's assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > Hey Sloman, it is clear that you ARE an idiot and can't do a simple search!
I'm not enough of an idiot to do your work for you. You want us to believe that you once had a pilot's license? Fine - go and find the evidence.
> BTW, you need to have someone look into your STUTTERING! And what the hell did you do with Bill Sloman's body, anyhow?
I don't stutter - and never did. And the body I inhabit has answered to the name Bill Sloman for some decades now. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:52:55 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, HOW do we know WHO THE HELL YOU ARE? You CLAIM to be Bill Sloman, but you could be just appropriating someone else's identity for all we know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am, I've been doing it here for some twenty-odd years now. You haven't got enough sense to be able track down the links that make it fairly obvious that I am the same person I was twenty-odd years ago, and there's no point in trying to spell it out for you - you clearly are an idiot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >So, don't go BOASTING that you are some person in OZ that you just looked up in the phone book or in elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who published the scientific papers that I have, and has his name on a couple of patents. You are remarkably dim, even for a Trump supporter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://site.ieee.org/nsw/committe/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've even got my photo on the NSW IEEE web-site, and I edit their news-letter, where my e-mail address is the same one you can see here. IEEE email addresses are unique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://site.ieee.org/nsw/files/2021/10/Circuit_October_2021-2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, your appropriation of someone else's identity, Bill Sloman, is dispicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably meant despicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to find that poor fellow and APOLOGIZE and hope he doesn't sue you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom S. hasn't realised that IEEE e-mail addresses really are unique. I "appropriated" the identity back around 1980 when I joined the IEEE. The people who supported my application were colleagues from EMI Central Research in the UK. I'd had to get a security clearance to work there, which took a while to come through I'd been cleared to "most secret" when I was working in Australia, which had got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. The IEEE didn't offer the e-mail aliasing service until the 1990's and I took advantage of it fairly early - if after I started posting stuff in sci.electronics.design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to post stuff here I have to log in to Google with my IEEE login about once a week - the IEEE subcontracted the e-mail aliasing and the rest of their security to Google a few years ago. It's not an "identity" that it would be easy to appropriate, not that you'd have clue about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Come to think of it, that's also the login I use to get at my "23 and me" genome data. When I got them to sequence my genome, the first reaction I got back pointed out that they had the genome of my nephew (the one who works for Google in Australia). His siblings and my younger brother had used https://www.ancestry.com.au/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That means that I've appropriated my own identity right down to my genome sequence. If somebody else sent in a buccal swab from me, "23 and me" would tell me that I had an identical twin. "Ancenstry,com.au" would tell my brother's family that he had a sibling, and the kids had an uncle. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, likely story - you are a fraud and we know it: who the hell knows who receives emails at that address. > > > > > > > > > > Actually the fraud here is Tom Seim. He knows so little about computer security that he can't recognise a robust system when it is described to him. > > > > > > > > > > He does have a habit of claiming to know about stuff that he clearly hasn't got a clue about. Now that he is claiming to post under his real name we can expect to see a pilot's license for the same name some time soon. The problem of proving that it is his real name, and that he is the Tom Seim named on the document will take quite a lot more discussion. I was publishing scientific papers (and getting the occasional patent) under my real name some twenty years before there was an internet. > > > > > > > > LOL! Hey SNIPPERMAN, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > > > > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiot's assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, it is clear that you ARE an idiot and can't do a simple search! > > I'm not enough of an idiot to do your work for you. You want us to believe that you once had a pilot's license? Fine - go and find the evidence. > > BTW, you need to have someone look into your STUTTERING! And what the hell did you do with SNIPPERMAN's body, anyhow? > I don't stutter - and never did. And the body I inhabit has answered to the name SNIPPERMAN for some decades now. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, it is YOU who called ME a liar - it is up to you to BACK UP your false claim, just like you would HAVE to do in court! BTW, you DID stutter, dolt!
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:39:59 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:52:55 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, HOW do we know WHO THE HELL YOU ARE? You CLAIM to be Bill Sloman, but you could be just appropriating someone else's identity for all we know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am, I've been doing it here for some twenty-odd years now. You haven't got enough sense to be able track down the links that make it fairly obvious that I am the same person I was twenty-odd years ago, and there's no point in trying to spell it out for you - you clearly are an idiot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >So, don't go BOASTING that you are some person in OZ that you just looked up in the phone book or in elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who published the scientific papers that I have, and has his name on a couple of patents. You are remarkably dim, even for a Trump supporter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://site.ieee.org/nsw/committe/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've even got my photo on the NSW IEEE web-site, and I edit their news-letter, where my e-mail address is the same one you can see here. IEEE email addresses are unique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://site.ieee.org/nsw/files/2021/10/Circuit_October_2021-2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, your appropriation of someone else's identity, Bill Sloman, is dispicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably meant despicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to find that poor fellow and APOLOGIZE and hope he doesn't sue you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom S. hasn't realised that IEEE e-mail addresses really are unique. I "appropriated" the identity back around 1980 when I joined the IEEE. The people who supported my application were colleagues from EMI Central Research in the UK. I'd had to get a security clearance to work there, which took a while to come through I'd been cleared to "most secret" when I was working in Australia, which had got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. The IEEE didn't offer the e-mail aliasing service until the 1990's and I took advantage of it fairly early - if after I started posting stuff in sci.electronics.design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to post stuff here I have to log in to Google with my IEEE login about once a week - the IEEE subcontracted the e-mail aliasing and the rest of their security to Google a few years ago. It's not an "identity" that it would be easy to appropriate, not that you'd have clue about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Come to think of it, that's also the login I use to get at my "23 and me" genome data. When I got them to sequence my genome, the first reaction I got back pointed out that they had the genome of my nephew (the one who works for Google in Australia). His siblings and my younger brother had used https://www.ancestry.com.au/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That means that I've appropriated my own identity right down to my genome sequence. If somebody else sent in a buccal swab from me, "23 and me" would tell me that I had an identical twin. "Ancenstry,com.au" would tell my brother's family that he had a sibling, and the kids had an uncle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, likely story - you are a fraud and we know it: who the hell knows who receives emails at that address. > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually the fraud here is Tom Seim. He knows so little about computer security that he can't recognise a robust system when it is described to him. > > > > > > > > > > > > He does have a habit of claiming to know about stuff that he clearly hasn't got a clue about. Now that he is claiming to post under his real name we can expect to see a pilot's license for the same name some time soon. The problem of proving that it is his real name, and that he is the Tom Seim named on the document will take quite a lot more discussion. I was publishing scientific papers (and getting the occasional patent) under my real name some twenty years before there was an internet. > > > > > > > > > > LOL! Hey Sloman, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > > > > > > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiot's assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > > > > > Hey Sloman, it is clear that you ARE an idiot and can't do a simple search! > > > > I'm not enough of an idiot to do your work for you. You want us to believe that you once had a pilot's license? Fine - go and find the evidence. > > > > > BTW, you need to have someone look into your STUTTERING! And what the hell did you do with Sloman's body, anyhow? > > > > I don't stutter - and never did. And the body I inhabit has answered to the name Bill Sloman for some decades now. > > Hey Sloman, it is YOU who called ME a liar - it is up to you to BACK UP your false claim, just like you would HAVE to do in court!
Find the cite that shows I called you a liar. You have posted a lot of misleading nonsense but you haven't got enough sense to realise that it was and is nonsense, so you aren't actually a liar.
> BTW, you DID stutter, dolt!
You'd have to be able to hear me to make that claim. If you had enough sense to appreciate what the word meant, your claim would be lie, but as it is, it is just more evidence that you are an idiot. Or a dolt, if you prefer the word. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 8:13:10 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:39:59 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:52:55 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, HOW do we know WHO THE HELL YOU ARE? You CLAIM to be Bill Sloman, but you could be just appropriating someone else's identity for all we know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am, I've been doing it here for some twenty-odd years now. You haven't got enough sense to be able track down the links that make it fairly obvious that I am the same person I was twenty-odd years ago, and there's no point in trying to spell it out for you - you clearly are an idiot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >So, don't go BOASTING that you are some person in OZ that you just looked up in the phone book or in elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who published the scientific papers that I have, and has his name on a couple of patents. You are remarkably dim, even for a Trump supporter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://site.ieee.org/nsw/committe/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've even got my photo on the NSW IEEE web-site, and I edit their news-letter, where my e-mail address is the same one you can see here. IEEE email addresses are unique. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://site.ieee.org/nsw/files/2021/10/Circuit_October_2021-2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, your appropriation of someone else's identity, Bill Sloman, is dispicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably meant despicable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to find that poor fellow and APOLOGIZE and hope he doesn't sue you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom S. hasn't realised that IEEE e-mail addresses really are unique. I "appropriated" the identity back around 1980 when I joined the IEEE. The people who supported my application were colleagues from EMI Central Research in the UK. I'd had to get a security clearance to work there, which took a while to come through I'd been cleared to "most secret" when I was working in Australia, which had got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. The IEEE didn't offer the e-mail aliasing service until the 1990's and I took advantage of it fairly early - if after I started posting stuff in sci.electronics.design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to post stuff here I have to log in to Google with my IEEE login about once a week - the IEEE subcontracted the e-mail aliasing and the rest of their security to Google a few years ago. It's not an "identity" that it would be easy to appropriate, not that you'd have clue about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Come to think of it, that's also the login I use to get at my "23 and me" genome data. When I got them to sequence my genome, the first reaction I got back pointed out that they had the genome of my nephew (the one who works for Google in Australia). His siblings and my younger brother had used https://www.ancestry.com.au/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That means that I've appropriated my own identity right down to my genome sequence. If somebody else sent in a buccal swab from me, "23 and me" would tell me that I had an identical twin. "Ancenstry,com.au" would tell my brother's family that he had a sibling, and the kids had an uncle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Sloman, likely story - you are a fraud and we know it: who the hell knows who receives emails at that address. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually the fraud here is Tom Seim. He knows so little about computer security that he can't recognise a robust system when it is described to him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He does have a habit of claiming to know about stuff that he clearly hasn't got a clue about. Now that he is claiming to post under his real name we can expect to see a pilot's license for the same name some time soon. The problem of proving that it is his real name, and that he is the Tom Seim named on the document will take quite a lot more discussion. I was publishing scientific papers (and getting the occasional patent) under my real name some twenty years before there was an internet. > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! Hey SNIPPERMAN, then you can look up my credentials at the FAA, after which you can APOLOGIZE for DEFAMING ME! > > > > > > > > > > If you weren't an idiot, you'd have posted a link to the relevant credentials. All that it would prove is that somebody with the same name got on their list some time ago. Even if it were you you've clearly had plenty of time to sink into senile dementia since then. And there's nothing particularly defamatory about pointing that some idiot's assertions show him to be an idiot - his fatuous assertions defame him much more convincingly than any critic could. > > > > > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, it is clear that you ARE an idiot and can't do a simple search! > > > > > > I'm not enough of an idiot to do your work for you. You want us to believe that you once had a pilot's license? Fine - go and find the evidence. > > > > > > > BTW, you need to have someone look into your STUTTERING! And what the hell did you do with Sloman's body, anyhow? > > > > > > I don't stutter - and never did. And the body I inhabit has answered to the name Bill Sloman for some decades now. > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, it is YOU who called ME a liar - it is up to you to BACK UP your false claim, just like you would HAVE to do in court! > > Find the cite that shows I called you a liar. You have posted a lot of misleading nonsense but you haven't got enough sense to realise that it was and is nonsense, so you aren't actually a liar. > > BTW, you DID stutter, dolt! > You'd have to be able to hear me to make that claim. If you had enough sense to appreciate what the word meant, your claim would be lie, but as it is, it is just more evidence that you are an idiot. Or a dolt, if you prefer the word. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, you STUTTERED - live with it!
On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 5:26:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 8:13:10 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:39:59 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:52:55 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote:
<snip>
> > You'd have to be able to hear me to make that claim. If you had enough sense to appreciate what the word meant, your claim would be lie, but as it is, it is just more evidence that you are an idiot. Or a dolt, if you prefer the word.
>
> Hey Sloman, you STUTTERED - live with it!
stutter: verb talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants. "the child was stuttering in fright" You'd have to hear me talk to make that claim. This is a text-only group so you will have to spell out what kind of action appears to you to constitute a "stutter". Mechanical engineers use the word when some mechanisms don't work as intended, but I'm not that kind of mechanism. We don't really need you to spell anything out - you are an idiot, and idiots do make all kinds of mistakes. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 5:18:57 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 5:26:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 8:13:10 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:39:59 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:52:55 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 3:27:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 10:57:49 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+11, Tom Seim wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:36:38 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 3:49:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:19:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:00:55 PM UTC+11, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 3:11:39 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:33:42 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 12:38:31 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 4:37:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:21:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:04:45 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > <snip> > > > You'd have to be able to hear me to make that claim. If you had enough sense to appreciate what the word meant, your claim would be lie, but as it is, it is just more evidence that you are an idiot. Or a dolt, if you prefer the word. > > > > Hey Sloman, you STUTTERED - live with it! > > stutter: verb > > talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants. > "the child was stuttering in fright" > > You'd have to hear me talk to make that claim. This is a text-only group so you will have to spell out what kind of action appears to you to constitute a "stutter". > Mechanical engineers use the word when some mechanisms don't work as intended, but I'm not that kind of mechanism. > > We don't really need you to spell anything out - you are an idiot, and idiots do make all kinds of mistakes. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, you STUTTERED - admit it!