Forums

OT: the Durham investigation still continues

Started by John Doe October 7, 2021
On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote:
<snip>
> > Hey Sloman, watch Joe Biden's talk and THEN tell me he was in FULL CONTROL of his faculties: > > https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1503348/joe-biden-speech-Illinois-vaccines-stumbling-incoherent-sky-news-australia-us-politics-vn
Why would I pay any attention to a piece that was published on the Murdoch-owned Sky News? It is just the Australian version of Fox News, and I get to see only when the program "Mediawatch" jeers at one of its more blatant misrepresentations, which it does pretty often. The UK Daily Express is famously right-wing, and consequently much loved by Cursitor Doom because it publishes "news" slanted to appeal to right-wing nitwits like him and you. This is just the kind of outlet that would publish a carefully edited video with added extra added stumbles and repetitions. Find some mainstream media that presents stuff that hasn't been adjusted to make it more appealing to you, and I might condescend to look at it. You are a device for publishing particularly fatuous Republican - Trumpian - propaganda, and we have noticed. Take your nonsense someplace where the audience is more gullible. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
https://newsnationusa.com/news/usanews/who-is-rodney-joffe-aka-tech-executive-1-in-durham-indictment/

Maybe drunkenness was the problem.

The name isn't "Robert Joffe".




-- 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

> "A powerful and influential player in the tech world, Joffe..." > > Who? Hardly anything about a Robert Joffe online that dates from before > the indictment.
On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, watch Joe Biden's talk and THEN tell me he was in FULL CONTROL of his faculties: > > > > https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1503348/joe-biden-speech-Illinois-vaccines-stumbling-incoherent-sky-news-australia-us-politics-vn > > Why would I pay any attention to a piece that was published on the Murdoch-owned Sky News? It is just the Australian version of Fox News, and I get to see only when the program "Mediawatch" jeers at one of its more blatant misrepresentations, which it does pretty often. > > The UK Daily Express is famously right-wing, and consequently much loved by Cursitor Doom because it publishes "news" slanted to appeal to right-wing nitwits like him and you. > > This is just the kind of outlet that would publish a carefully edited video with added extra added stumbles and repetitions. > > Find some mainstream media that presents stuff that hasn't been adjusted to make it more appealing to you, and I might condescend to look at it. > > You are a device for publishing particularly fatuous Republican - Trumpian - propaganda, and we have noticed. > > Take your nonsense someplace where the audience is more gullible. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, because it IS Lyin' Biden attempts at talking. This proves his entering early onset dementia. Find him babbling on your favorite Lefty channel, if you prefer. This is yet another example of your refusal to accept reality. Life must be a bitch imitating an ostrich!
On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > <snip> > > > This is just the kind of outlet that would publish a carefully edited video with added extra added stumbles and repetitions. > > > > > > Find some mainstream media that presents stuff that hasn't been adjusted to make it more appealing to you, and I might condescend to look at it. > > > > > > You are a device for publishing particularly fatuous Republican - Trumpian - propaganda, and we have noticed. > > > > > > Take your nonsense someplace where the audience is more gullible. > > > > Hey SNIPPERMAN, because it IS Joe Biden attempts at talking. This proves his entering early onset dementia. Find him babbling on your favorite Lefty channel, if you prefer. > > He doesn't babble. Adults don't. And his speech errors aren't any kind of symptom of progressive dementia - he's 78 and if you start showing signs of dementia then it isn't "early onset". Ronald Reagan's dementia was detectable when he was 74. It wasn't undeniable until he was 83. > > Joe Biden has been making speech errors since he entered politics. If there is a problem. it isn't progressive. Donald Trump's 2020 election propaganda tried to claim otherwise but Donald Trump is a malicious liar, and always has been. You are a gullible twit and will swallow all kinds of nonsense, so you are silly enough to take that nonsense seriously. > > This is yet another example of your refusal to accept reality. Life must be a bitch imitating an ostrich! > Tom S has a very poor comprehension of reality - he couldn't be a Trump supporter if he had any grasp of real world facts (like Covid-19 death rate statistics). He must have to put up with a lot of people questioning his sanity, but he does seem to have mastered the art of believing what it suits him to believe, and ignoring everything else. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney > > --
Hey SNIPPERMAN, I see that you DON'T LISTEN to Lyin' Biden. Lyin' Biden's "speech errors" have gone WAY OVER BOARD to clear senility. The turd confuses males and females (maybe the males look better to him), for God's sake. Lyin' Biden is, of course, the "malicious liar" - he has lied from Day One to present, and not about little things, either. His latest BIG lie is that this libtard program will COST NOTHING! I also see that you have NOT RESPONDED to my offer to wager about my status as a CERTIFIED PILOT - is your bluster running a bit thin?
On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 3:35:29 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 3:56:53 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 4:42:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 7:24:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 11:01:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 11:43:34 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 4:53:13 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27:43 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 3:29:50 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 9:36:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:22 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > This is just the kind of outlet that would publish a carefully edited video with added extra added stumbles and repetitions. > > > > > > > > Find some mainstream media that presents stuff that hasn't been adjusted to make it more appealing to you, and I might condescend to look at it. > > > > > > > > You are a device for publishing particularly fatuous Republican - Trumpian - propaganda, and we have noticed. > > > > > > > > Take your nonsense someplace where the audience is more gullible. > > > > > > Hey Sloman, because it IS Joe Biden attempts at talking. This proves his entering early onset dementia. Find him babbling on your favorite Lefty channel, if you prefer. > > > > He doesn't babble. Adults don't. And his speech errors aren't any kind of symptom of progressive dementia - he's 78 and if you start showing signs of dementia then it isn't "early onset". Ronald Reagan's dementia was detectable when he was 74. It wasn't undeniable until he was 83. > > > > Joe Biden has been making speech errors since he entered politics. If there is a problem. it isn't progressive. Donald Trump's 2020 election propaganda tried to claim otherwise but Donald Trump is a malicious liar, and always has been. You are a gullible twit and will swallow all kinds of nonsense, so you are silly enough to take that nonsense seriously. > > > > This is yet another example of your refusal to accept reality. Life must be a bitch imitating an ostrich! > > > Tom S has a very poor comprehension of reality - he couldn't be a Trump supporter if he had any grasp of real world facts (like Covid-19 death rate statistics). He must have to put up with a lot of people questioning his sanity, but he does seem to have mastered the art of believing what it suits him to believe, and ignoring everything else. > > Hey Sloman, I see that you DON'T LISTEN to Joe Biden. Jor Biden's "speech errors" have gone WAY OVER BOARD to clear senility.
Ask anybody silly enough to take Donald Trump seriously. The main stream media doesn't seem to have noticed. <snip>
> I also see that you have NOT RESPONDED to my offer to wager about my status as a CERTIFIED PILOT - is your bluster running a bit thin?
So you have a piece of paper with your real name on it saying that you were once a pilot but now have been certified as insane and mustn't be let anywhere near an aircraft? As an anonymous troll, how are you going to give us access to this? Since you are clearly insane, you won't have thought about this. You may even have some lunatic scheme to make money out of it. It would - of course - be irresponsible to encourage your lunatic fantasies. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bill Sloman) 

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bill Sloman, paraphrased) 

Bozo Bill, a non-American America-bashing chronic liar, cannot be reasoned
with. When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover its
prior lies. Its fiction never ends. 
On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 9:14:05 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions" > (Bill Sloman)
... is out of context, of course.
> "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so" > (Bill Sloman, paraphrased)
Widely regarded as true.
> Bozo Bill, a non-American America-bashing chronic liar, cannot be reasoned > with. When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover its > prior lies. Its fiction never ends.
Provocative, repetitive drivel. If 'reasoned with' were ever attempted, no one on this group has ever seen that from John Doe.
By the way... Have you searched the Internet 
for "Let's go Brandon" recently?
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 8:07:43 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > John Doe wrote: > > >> "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions" > >> (Bill Sloman) > > > > ... is out of context, of course. > > Wrong, Bozo just went on to say other idiotic stuff as usual.
Stuff that our lunatic John Doe didn't agree with.
> >> "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it > >> so" (Bill Sloman, paraphrased) > > > > Widely regarded as true. > > Provide citations of you or Bozo saying that AT THE TIME PRIOR TO MARCH > 2019 WHEN THE MUELLER PROBE ENDED.
Trump's complaints about the Mueller inquiry started very early - and he did seem to think that it was all about his "collusion" with the Russian interventions on the 2016 presidential election, when the primary focus was always the Russian interventions. Since the interventions demonstrably occured there wasn't any hoax there, a point which Donald Trump seems incapable of appreciating - he wasn't interested in any aspect of the inquiry that wasn't about him.
> But of course it can't. Chronic liars make up stuff like that to suit the > moment. When you prove them wrong, they just make up more stuff.
That's our John Doe. <snip>
> I would be surprised if it can provide AT THE TIME instances of that by any of its favorite propaganda outlets on the Internet.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/08/russiagate-wasnt-a-hoax/615373/
> There is an easy one for it, if it weren't LYING. > > I can provide a JILLION counter examples. It was all about NAILING Trump, as everybody with at least one eye open knows.
All of them invented by people as silly as John Doe
> Durham knows... :D
Twaddle.
> >> Bozo Bill, a non-American America-bashing chronic liar, cannot be > >> reasoned with. When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies > >> to cover its prior lies. Its fiction never ends. > > > > Provocative, repetitive drivel. If 'reasoned with' were ever > > attempted, no one on this group has ever seen that from John Doe. > > I and others are smart enough to know better.
John Doe does suffer from delusions of competence. He might not be a s dumb as Flyguy, but he's dumber than even Cursitor Doom.
> That's one reason why Bozo rarely gets a (contextual) response.
That's what John Doe likes to claim. In fact John Doe has to struggle to put together the deluded nonsense it can manage to post. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
No Bozo, I wasn't asking you. Obviously that would be a complete waste of time...

-- 
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:a37:a105:: with SMTP id k5mr1041460qke.427.1635384311702; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) > X-Received: by 2002:a25:3104:: with SMTP id x4mr1293846ybx.512.1635384311511; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) > Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) > In-Reply-To: <slcf2p$1la$1@dont-email.me> > Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.213.69.109; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi- > NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.213.69.109 > References: <sjn7up$v8g$1@dont-email.me> <fd678ec4-1d0d-4dcc-a7c0-2433b014b39an@googlegroups.com> <71c95983-9226-45b5-8427-b1651dafeac4n@googlegroups.com> <527d0fa5-44ff-46a7-bbd8-f0c58877712dn@googlegroups.com> <2bd841da-5b18-4776-ae7b-091e291e43dcn@googlegroups.com> <e66fb4b4-4035-44a6-a28e-f8b62a157485n@googlegroups.com> <f7800ee4-ff47-4250-b4f0-4d5a9bf5480cn@googlegroups.com> <0a55da8d-aae6-4073-887c-5e49660842een@googlegroups.com> <8da38219-5a13-4886-9455-fd145cf06a68n@googlegroups.com> <68186f2b-7c22-41db-8e1f-bc007b4a3f90n@googlegroups.com> <6e49b80f-fda7-4a6e-92e0-4431c68e2298n@googlegroups.com> <3e29e19c-02c9-4278-b39d-546e4a862b64n@googlegroups.com> <eda341d2-584f-4698-a610-625b2f7004e2n@googlegroups.com> <dee12b28-4b1e-4e4c-9085-bd7ff9c53b5cn@googlegroups.com> <4ad76828-d33e-47ad-bd23-11f54acd918bn@googlegroups.com> <c5b8b869-352f-480d-b836-caf71791b858n@googlegroups.com> <slbts8$s0t$2@dont-email.me> <10d4ebcb-1c87-4621-9f84-92de9977a2fdn@googlegroups.com> <slcf2p$1la$1@dont-email.me> > User-Agent: G2/1.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <6c94bbef-6dc8-491d-8e81-d56efd7bec75n@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: OT: the Durham investigation still continues > From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> > Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:25:11 +0000 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Lines: 77 > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:650623 > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 8:07:43 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote: >> whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > John Doe wrote: >> >> >> "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions > " >> >> (Bill Sloman) >> > >> > ... is out of context, of course. >> >> Wrong, Bozo just went on to say other idiotic stuff as usual. > > Stuff that our lunatic John Doe didn't agree with. > >> >> "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it > >> >> so" (Bill Sloman, paraphrased) >> > >> > Widely regarded as true. >> >> Provide citations of you or Bozo saying that AT THE TIME PRIOR TO MARCH > >> 2019 WHEN THE MUELLER PROBE ENDED. > > Trump's complaints about the Mueller inquiry started very early - and he did seem to think that it was all about his "collusion" with the Russian interventions on the 2016 presidential election, when the primary focus was always the Russian interventions. Since the interventions demonstrably occured there wasn't any hoax there, a point which Donald Trump seems incapable of appreciating - he wasn't interested in any aspect of the inquiry that wasn't about him. > >> But of course it can't. Chronic liars make up stuff like that to suit the > >> moment. When you prove them wrong, they just make up more stuff. > > That's our John Doe. > > <snip> > >> I would be surprised if it can provide AT THE TIME instances of that by a > ny of its favorite propaganda outlets on the Internet. > > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/08/russiagate-wasnt-a-hoax/615373/ > >> There is an easy one for it, if it weren't LYING. >> >> I can provide a JILLION counter examples. It was all about NAILING Trump, > as everybody with at least one eye open knows. > > All of them invented by people as silly as John Doe > >> Durham knows... :D > > Twaddle. > >> >> Bozo Bill, a non-American America-bashing chronic liar, cannot be >> >> reasoned with. When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies > >> >> to cover its prior lies. Its fiction never ends. >> > >> > Provocative, repetitive drivel. If 'reasoned with' were ever >> > attempted, no one on this group has ever seen that from John Doe. >> >> I and others are smart enough to know better. > > John Doe does suffer from delusions of competence. He might not be a s dumb as Flyguy, but he's dumber than even Cursitor Doom. > >> That's one reason why Bozo rarely gets a (contextual) response. > > That's what John Doe likes to claim. In fact John Doe has to struggle to put together the deluded nonsense it can manage to post. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Sydney > >