Forums

OT: the Durham investigation still continues

Started by John Doe October 7, 2021
On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 5:41:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote: > > > https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/10/07/durham_probes_pentagon_computer_contractors_in_anti-trump_conspiracy_797790.html > > > > > > That article names (and even pictures) more of the players. It details the > > > reason for likely further indictments. It's deep, reading comprehension is > > > required. > > > > > > "A whole lot of squirmin' goin' on... la la la" > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics > > > > RealClear is definitely right-leaning and pro-Trump - John Doe wouldn't be citing them if they weren't. > > > > Trump and his supporters don't like being reminded that the Mueller investigation showed that the Russians had intervened in the 2016 presidential elections, and may have given Trump his remarkably narrow victory - it didn't look narrow in electoral college votes, but he won the three states that turned out to be critical with a margin of about 80.000 votes, and the Russian fake Facebook influencers had been very active in those states. > > > > The obsession with the Durham investigation is aimed at presenting the Mueller investigation as a device to frame Trump, when it was primarily an investigation into the Russian intervention into the 206 presidential campaign - which was definitely pro-Trump but seems to have been motivate by the entirely correct perception that Trump would be a disaster as a US president, and less effective at giving the Russian kleptocrats a hard time than Hillary Clinton had been when she was Secretary of State or would have been if she''d been elected to the presidency. > > > > Trump is the kind of crook who would have helped them if he'd known about what was going on, but he'd have also been a horrible security risk, so he probably didn't. > > Hey Sloman, you totally ignore the real crooks in politics: the Clintons and the Bidens.
Flyguy seems to think that I should be silly enough to pay attention the fatuous political propaganda that he is gullible enough to recycle. <snip> > Shrillary bankrolled the notorious Steele "dossier" (really just a collection of porn fantasies) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier "In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. Separately, in April 2016, an attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while the Free Beacon stopped its backing in May 2016. In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. DNC officials denied knowing their attorney had contracted with Fusion GPS, and Steele asserted he was not aware the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research until months after he contracted with Fusion GPS." Steele did collect some stories that did sound like porn fanatasies, but the job he had been given was to find out about rumours that were circulating - and if he had left out the salicious ones he wouldn't have been doing his job. Trump famously paid off at least one porn star, so the stories weren't implausible.
> They were the excuse for the Russian collusion probe, which, after two years and millions of tax payer dollars, found exactly ZERO collusion.
The Mueller probe was into Russian intervention in the 2016 election, and they found plenty of that. Trump is a narcissists, so the Mueller inquiry had to be all about him - the Russians could only matter if he'd been collaborating with them <snipped more of the same> -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
On 10/9/2021 5:58 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 5:41:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: >> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: >>> On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote: >>>> https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/10/07/durham_probes_pentagon_computer_contractors_in_anti-trump_conspiracy_797790.html >>>> >>>> That article names (and even pictures) more of the players. It details the >>>> reason for likely further indictments. It's deep, reading comprehension is >>>> required. >>>> >>>> "A whole lot of squirmin' goin' on... la la la" >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics >>> >>> RealClear is definitely right-leaning and pro-Trump - John Doe wouldn't be citing them if they weren't. >>> >>> Trump and his supporters don't like being reminded that the Mueller investigation showed that the Russians had intervened in the 2016 presidential elections, and may have given Trump his remarkably narrow victory - it didn't look narrow in electoral college votes, but he won the three states that turned out to be critical with a margin of about 80.000 votes, and the Russian fake Facebook influencers had been very active in those states. >>> >>> The obsession with the Durham investigation is aimed at presenting the Mueller investigation as a device to frame Trump, when it was primarily an investigation into the Russian intervention into the 206 presidential campaign - which was definitely pro-Trump but seems to have been motivate by the entirely correct perception that Trump would be a disaster as a US president, and less effective at giving the Russian kleptocrats a hard time than Hillary Clinton had been when she was Secretary of State or would have been if she''d been elected to the presidency. >>> >>> Trump is the kind of crook who would have helped them if he'd known about what was going on, but he'd have also been a horrible security risk, so he probably didn't. >> >> Hey Sloman, you totally ignore the real crooks in politics: the Clintons and the Bidens. > > Flyguy seems to think that I should be silly enough to pay attention the fatuous political propaganda that he is gullible enough to recycle. > > <snip> > > > Shrillary bankrolled the notorious Steele "dossier" (really just a collection of porn fantasies) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier > > "In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. Separately, in April 2016, an attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while the Free Beacon stopped its backing in May 2016. In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. DNC officials denied knowing their attorney had contracted with Fusion GPS, and Steele asserted he was not aware the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research until months after he contracted with Fusion GPS." > > Steele did collect some stories that did sound like porn fanatasies, but the job he had been given was to find out about rumours that were circulating - and if he had left out the salicious ones he wouldn't have been doing his job. Trump famously paid off at least one porn star, so the stories weren't implausible. > >> They were the excuse for the Russian collusion probe, which, after two years and millions of tax payer dollars, found exactly ZERO collusion. > > The Mueller probe was into Russian intervention in the 2016 election, and they found plenty of that. Trump is a narcissists, so the Mueller inquiry had to be all about him - the Russians could only matter if he'd been collaborating with them > > <snipped more of the same> >
It would be easy to just chuckle and not take this sad pack of freedom-loving hut-hutters particularly seriously if they weren't always hut-hutting around in their Waffen SS boots trying to take freedom from everyone who isn't them.
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

> <the usual hysterical garbage>
According to the Bible... Jesus does not treat everyone with kid gloves. Offhand... There is the whipping salesman out of the church foyer thing. Also in the instruction of his disciples. The cannibal leftist troll's opinions as usual are pulled out of a hat. Preaching about something you disbelieve is blatant hypocrisy...
Rational discussion does not happen with cannibal leftist chronic liars.

Arguing with chronic liars is pointless. Doesn't matter how many times you 
refute their lies, they simply make up more lies to cover those lies. Their 
lies never end. Discussing anything with them just encourages them to lie 
more...
"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bill Sloman) 

Bozo is such a hideously degenerate troll, difficult not to confront the 
scumbag, but Americans don't need the foreign interference on such a very
important issue. 
You may as well get used to it...

I shouldn't enjoy it, but it will be fun to watch.

You cannibal leftists are squirming like toads.
On 10/9/2021 2:15 PM, John Doe wrote:
> You may as well get used to it... > > I shouldn't enjoy it, but it will be fun to watch. > > You cannibal leftists are squirming like toads. >
You are a big time drama-queen, who seems to think I deeply care what happens to Hillary Clinton. Go 'head put her away for life, already, damn.
On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote: > > https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/10/07/durham_probes_pentagon_computer_contractors_in_anti-trump_conspiracy_797790.html > > > > That article names (and even pictures) more of the players. It details the > > reason for likely further indictments. It's deep, reading comprehension is > > required. > > > > "A whole lot of squirmin' goin' on... la la la" > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics > > RealClear is definitely right-leaning and pro-Trump - John Doe wouldn't be citing them if they weren't. > > Trump and his supporters don't like being reminded that the Mueller investigation showed that the Russians had intervened in the 2016 presidential elections, and may have given Trump his remarkably narrow victory - it didn't look narrow in electoral college votes, but he won the three states that turned out to be critical with a margin of about 80.000 votes, and the Russian fake Facebook influencers had been very active in those states. > > The obsession with the Durham investigation is aimed at presenting the Mueller investigation as a device to frame Trump, when it was primarily an investigation into the Russian intervention into the 206 presidential campaign - which was definitely pro-Trump but seems to have been motivate by the entirely correct perception that Trump would be a disaster as a US president, and less effective at giving the Russian kleptocrats a hard time than Hillary Clinton had been when she was Secretary of State or would have been if she''d been elected to the presidency. > > Trump is the kind of crook who would have helped them if he'd known about what was going on, but he'd have also been a horrible security risk, so he probably didn't. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
The ONLY thing SNIPPERMAN reads is the WAPO and the ONLY thing he watches is MSNBC! If it ain't left wing bullshit it doesn't count. Well, the Quinnipiac poll is HARDLY right wing - it is as about as far left as they get, and they say that Lyin' Biden's numbers are IN THE TOILET: https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?utm_campaign=wp_the_daily_202&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_daily202&releaseid=3824 ALL of Lyin' Biden's numbers are UNDER WATER, and the asshole deserves EVERY ONE OF THEM. I have NEVER seen a President self-destruct in such record time. But I am not surprised because the fool is SENILE. He has committed numerous impeachable offenses, but will skate because the alternative, Konfused Kamala, is WORSE!
On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote:
<snip>
> > The obsession with the Durham investigation is aimed at presenting the Mueller investigation as a device to frame Trump, when it was primarily an investigation into the Russian intervention into the 206 presidential campaign - which was definitely pro-Trump but seems to have been motivate by the entirely correct perception that Trump would be a disaster as a US president, and less effective at giving the Russian kleptocrats a hard time than Hillary Clinton had been when she was Secretary of State or would have been if she''d been elected to the presidency. > > > > Trump is the kind of crook who would have helped them if he'd known about what was going on, but he'd have also been a horrible security risk, so he probably didn't. > > The ONLY thing Sloman reads is the WAPO and the ONLY thing he watches is MSNBC!
Flyguy is much too dim to realise that I live in Australia - the newspaper I read is the Sydney Morning Herald, and the news I watch comes from the Australian Broadcasting Coorporation. These are both main-stream media outlets, and not designed to cater to right-wing conspiracy theory addicts. You can get that kind of "news" in Australia from the Murdoch-owned Sky News, which broadcasts the same kind of nonsense as the Murdoch-owned Fox News in the US.
> If it ain't left wing bullshit it doesn't count. Well, the Quinnipiac poll is HARDLY right wing - it is as about as far left as they get, and they say that Joe Biden's numbers are IN THE TOILET: > > https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?utm_campaign=wp_the_daily_202&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_daily202&releaseid=3824
What they actually show is that Joe Biden is less popular now that he was when he was elected, which what normally happens to newly elected presidents. Flyguy is a half-wit, so he wants to read more into this than the data supports.
> ALL of Joe Biden's numbers are UNDER WATER, and the asshole deserves EVERY ONE OF THEM. I have NEVER seen a President self-destruct in such record time.
Gerald Ford went down faster and further. Of course he hadn't been elected. Flyguy doesn't see anything that he doesn't want to see.
> But I am not surprised because the fool is SENILE. He has committed numerous impeachable offenses, but will skate because the alternative, Kamala Harris , is WORSE!
Flyguy is senile enough to believe Trump's 2019 election propaganda. Ronald Reagan actually was suffering from senile dementia for his last two years in office - he was showing clear (if subtle) early signs of it when he ran for his second term, as was pointed out by a British academic - Brian Butterworth - who we knew. When somebody digs up something like the Contragate scandal, Flyguy will have something worth complaining about. At the moment he's just churning out particularly fatuous partisan propaganda. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 7:03:05 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 12:31:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote: > > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:41:04 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote: > > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:41:01 AM UT+11, John Doe wrote: > > <snip> > > > The obsession with the Durham investigation is aimed at presenting the Mueller investigation as a device to frame Trump, when it was primarily an investigation into the Russian intervention into the 206 presidential campaign - which was definitely pro-Trump but seems to have been motivate by the entirely correct perception that Trump would be a disaster as a US president, and less effective at giving the Russian kleptocrats a hard time than Hillary Clinton had been when she was Secretary of State or would have been if she''d been elected to the presidency. > > > > > > Trump is the kind of crook who would have helped them if he'd known about what was going on, but he'd have also been a horrible security risk, so he probably didn't. > > > > The ONLY thing Sloman reads is the WAPO and the ONLY thing he watches is MSNBC! > > Flyguy is much too dim to realise that I live in Australia - the newspaper I read is the Sydney Morning Herald, and the news I watch comes from the Australian Broadcasting Coorporation. These are both main-stream media outlets, and not designed to cater to right-wing conspiracy theory addicts. You can get that kind of "news" in Australia from the Murdoch-owned Sky News, which broadcasts the same kind of nonsense as the Murdoch-owned Fox News in the US. > > > If it ain't left wing bullshit it doesn't count. Well, the Quinnipiac poll is HARDLY right wing - it is as about as far left as they get, and they say that Joe Biden's numbers are IN THE TOILET: > > > > https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?utm_campaign=wp_the_daily_202&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_daily202&releaseid=3824 > > What they actually show is that Joe Biden is less popular now that he was when he was elected, which what normally happens to newly elected presidents. > > Flyguy is a half-wit, so he wants to read more into this than the data supports. > > > ALL of Joe Biden's numbers are UNDER WATER, and the asshole deserves EVERY ONE OF THEM. I have NEVER seen a President self-destruct in such record time. > > Gerald Ford went down faster and further. Of course he hadn't been elected. Flyguy doesn't see anything that he doesn't want to see. > > > But I am not surprised because the fool is SENILE. He has committed numerous impeachable offenses, but will skate because the alternative, Kamala Harris , is WORSE! > > Flyguy is senile enough to believe Trump's 2019 election propaganda. Ronald Reagan actually was suffering from senile dementia for his last two years in office - he was showing clear (if subtle) early signs of it when he ran for his second term, as was pointed out by a British academic - Brian Butterworth - who we knew. > > When somebody digs up something like the Contragate scandal, Flyguy will have something worth complaining about. At the moment he's just churning out particularly fatuous partisan propaganda. > > -- > SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
Hey SNIPPERMAN, now we now how LITTLE news you read or watch - thanks for setting me straight on that. No, Reagan WASN'T suffering dementia while in office - if you had PROOF that he was you would STATE it, and by proof I mean a medical diagnosis by an expert who actually examined Reagan, not an CNN bloviator.