Forums

COVID and Right to Life

Started by Rick C September 11, 2021
Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo 

A case in which the Court issue a preliminary injunction preventing New
York from enforcing COVID-19 related occupancy limits on religious
services because of their burden on religion. 


-- 
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:d8e:: with SMTP id q14mr6865121qkl.409.1632427203696; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT) > X-Received: by 2002:a25:2cc2:: with SMTP id s185mr8300358ybs.196.1632427203455; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT) > Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT) > In-Reply-To: <ebac975b-c31b-47fe-bcb4-826f3c55317dn@googlegroups.com> > Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.55.84.254; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b > NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.55.84.254 > References: <ebac975b-c31b-47fe-bcb4-826f3c55317dn@googlegroups.com> > User-Agent: G2/1.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <f3492507-7006-4495-8e4b-1e3fef247d4cn@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: OT - COVID and Right to Life > From: Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:00:03 +0000 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Lines: 26 > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:646303 > > I've been reading of religious exemptions to requirements for vaccination in jobs. I'm not sure that is a good idea. I believe (please correct me if I'm wrong) there have been examples of religiously sanctioned behavior that remains prohibited by law or to force behavior that is required by law. There are also examples of counterpoints. > > In Wisconsin v. Yoder the court ruled that the state's interest in providing education was not significant enough to override the individual's religious beliefs. > > In United States v. Lee, the court ruled the religious belief interests of workers and employers was not significant enough to allow exclusion to contributing to the Social Security system. > > I think the degree of distinction in these two cases shows the line is drawn such that a religious exemption to receiving a generally safe vaccine which can help prevent the deaths of hundreds of thousands or even millions of US citizens would not be allowed. I'm pretty sure a rate of death of 1,700 per day is adequate to show a significant interest by the state in mandating vaccinations to everyone medically capable of receiving them. > > -- > > Rick C. > > +- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging > +- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209 > >
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id 
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from > breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is > CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:05:50 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <siimmu$rqk$4@dont-email.me>.