Electronics-Related.com
Forums

wideband FM demodulator

Started by John Larkin October 31, 2018
Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote:

> On 31.10.18 07:57, Steve Wilson wrote: >> Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >> >>> On 10/31/18 12:52 AM, John Larkin wrote: >> >>>> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using >>>> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. >> >>>> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these >>>> days? >> >>>> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR >>>> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being >>>> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. >> >>> For bandwidths that wide, I'd be looking at a delay discriminator. In >>> the lab that would be a coax cable and a MCL mixer. >> >>> Cheers >> >>> Phil Hobbs >> >> How do you get down to DC with a delay discriminator? > > > A ring mixer can go down to DC on its low-frequency port. > When the delay is 90 degrees, the output will be zero.
Doesn't help. You need a reference frequency which doesn't exist on a delay discriminator.
On 31.10.18 10:33, Steve Wilson wrote:
> Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote: > >> On 31.10.18 07:57, Steve Wilson wrote: >>> Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/31/18 12:52 AM, John Larkin wrote: >>> >>>>> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using >>>>> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. >>> >>>>> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these >>>>> days? >>> >>>>> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR >>>>> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being >>>>> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. >>> >>>> For bandwidths that wide, I'd be looking at a delay discriminator. In >>>> the lab that would be a coax cable and a MCL mixer. >>> >>>> Cheers >>> >>>> Phil Hobbs >>> >>> How do you get down to DC with a delay discriminator? >> >> >> A ring mixer can go down to DC on its low-frequency port. >> When the delay is 90 degrees, the output will be zero. > > Doesn't help. You need a reference frequency which doesn't exist on a delay > discriminator.
The reference is in the delay. You take two copies of the amplitude-limited input signal, delay one of them and mix together. The low-passed mixer output is zero on the ferquency where the line delay is 90 degrees. -- -TV
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 1:57:23 AM UTC-4, Steve Wilson wrote:
> Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: > > > On 10/31/18 12:52 AM, John Larkin wrote: > > >> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using > >> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > > >> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these > >> days? > > >> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR > >> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being > >> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > > > For bandwidths that wide, I'd be looking at a delay discriminator. In > > the lab that would be a coax cable and a MCL mixer. > > > Cheers > > > Phil Hobbs > > How do you get down to DC with a delay discriminator?
Never mind. At 500 Mhz, a 500 ps delay would provide the necessary phase shift for a quadrature demodulator.
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 4:23:21 AM UTC-4, Tauno Voipio wrote:
> On 31.10.18 07:57, Steve Wilson wrote: > > Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: > > > >> On 10/31/18 12:52 AM, John Larkin wrote: > > > >>> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using > >>> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > > > >>> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these > >>> days? > > > >>> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR > >>> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being > >>> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > > > >> For bandwidths that wide, I'd be looking at a delay discriminator. In > >> the lab that would be a coax cable and a MCL mixer. > > > >> Cheers > > > >> Phil Hobbs > > > > How do you get down to DC with a delay discriminator? > > > A ring mixer can go down to DC on its low-frequency port. > When the delay is 90 degrees, the output will be zero. > > -- > > -TV
Yes. At 500 Mhz, a 500 ps delay would provide the necessary phase shift for a quadrature demodulator.
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 5:04:12 AM UTC-4, Tauno Voipio wrote:
> On 31.10.18 10:33, Steve Wilson wrote: > > Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote: > > > >> On 31.10.18 07:57, Steve Wilson wrote: > >>> Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 10/31/18 12:52 AM, John Larkin wrote: > >>> > >>>>> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using > >>>>> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > >>> > >>>>> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these > >>>>> days? > >>> > >>>>> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR > >>>>> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being > >>>>> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > >>> > >>>> For bandwidths that wide, I'd be looking at a delay discriminator. In > >>>> the lab that would be a coax cable and a MCL mixer. > >>> > >>>> Cheers > >>> > >>>> Phil Hobbs > >>> > >>> How do you get down to DC with a delay discriminator? > >> > >> > >> A ring mixer can go down to DC on its low-frequency port. > >> When the delay is 90 degrees, the output will be zero. > > > > Doesn't help. You need a reference frequency which doesn't exist on a delay > > discriminator. > > > The reference is in the delay. > > You take two copies of the amplitude-limited input signal, > delay one of them and mix together. The low-passed mixer > output is zero on the ferquency where the line delay is 90 degrees. > > -- > > -TV
Yes. At 500 Mhz, a 500 ps delay would provide the necessary phase shift for a quadrature demodulator.
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 4:21:31 AM UTC-4, Steve Wilson wrote:
> Steve Wilson <no@spam.com> wrote: > > > John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > > > >> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using > >> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > > > >> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these > >> days? > > > >> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR > >> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being > >> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > > > > You have a scope with an isolated ground. Take it apart and find out how > > it works. > > Probably a Tek TPS2000. I would expect a pll demodulator. Not hard to do with > today's ic's.
Never mind. At 500 Mhz, a 500 ps delay would provide the necessary phase shift for a quadrature demodulator.
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 4:21:31 AM UTC-4, Steve Wilson wrote:
> Steve Wilson <no@spam.com> wrote: > > > John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > > > >> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using > >> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > > > >> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these > >> days? > > > >> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR > >> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being > >> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > > > > You have a scope with an isolated ground. Take it apart and find out how > > it works. > > Probably a Tek TPS2000. I would expect a pll demodulator. Not hard to do with > today's ic's.
Nah. A 1/4 wave delay is much simpler and has wider bandwidth. At 500 MHz, a 500 ps delay will provide the necessary phase shift for a quadrature demodulator. You need a fairly wide frequency modulation for reasonable demodulated signal amplitude. I'm trying to decide if that will produce significant distortion but don't have time to model it in LTspice.
John Larkin wrote
>We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using >FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. > >I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these >days?
An other way, using same one shot, is if you have say 1GHz, and a sweep from 0.9 to 1.1 GHz, mix it down with 800 MHz, lowpass 200 MHz (only want the diff, not the 1.9 GHz) Now you have a sweep from 100 MHz to 200 MHz. Trigger a fixed time oneshot on each zero crossing, lowpass <= 50 MHz, now you have a 1 to 2 voltage change. Its linear Its simple It is not suitable for a radio link, bit works fine on fixed wire.
On 10/31/18 8:38 AM, 698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org wrote:
> John Larkin wrote >> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal >> using FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range >> maybe. >> >> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator >> these days? > > An other way, using same one shot, is if you have say 1GHz, and a > sweep from 0.9 to 1.1 GHz, mix it down with 800 MHz, lowpass 200 MHz > (only want the diff, not the 1.9 GHz) Now you have a sweep from 100 > MHz to 200 MHz. Trigger a fixed time oneshot on each zero crossing, > lowpass <= 50 MHz, now you have a 1 to 2 voltage change. Its linear > Its simple
It's drifty and super noisy Its sensitivity is harder to predict It requires way more circuitry
> It is not suitable for a radio link, bit works fine on fixed wire.
For sufficiently permissive definitions of 'fine'. ;) Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 05:45:35 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

>On 2018-10-31, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> >> >> We're thinking of sending a wideband (say, dc to 50 MHz) signal using >> FM. The carrier could be in the 500 MHz to 1 GHz range maybe. >> >> I can get the VCO. What's a good way to do the FM discriminator these >> days? >> >> I could homebrew a quadrature detector, with some resonator and an XOR >> gate or a mixer, but there must be some easier way to do it. Not being >> an RF type, I'd appreciate suggestions. > >SDR
Easy for you to say! -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics