Electronics-Related.com
Forums

What is the most powerful audio output tube?

Started by Unknown December 8, 2016
What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage
output? 

I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull
parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes,
which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm
looking into other possible tubes. 

At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but
after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different
envelope (plate on the top cap). 

I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from
all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W
RMS (per channel).

On 12/08/2016 10:19 AM, boomer#6877250@none.com wrote:
> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > output? > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, > which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm > looking into other possible tubes. > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but > after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different > envelope (plate on the top cap). > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from > all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W > RMS (per channel). >
The output tranny required for 500 watts RMS is going to be a huge piece of fuck-off iron that will probably set you back the better part of a grand, at least. 500 watts RMS from four tubes will require you to step up way beyond 6L6es and 807s, I think. You're probably going to want to look at something like RF power triodes or tetrodes, 813s or the GU-13 if you're okay with going ex-Soviet. I am not a pro tube guy though so that's just my guess.
On 8.12.16 17:19, boomer#6877250@none.com wrote:
> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > output? > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, > which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm > looking into other possible tubes. > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but > after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different > envelope (plate on the top cap). > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from > all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W > RMS (per channel).
807 is the transmitting version of 6L6, so it's no wonder that it looks similar. For the power level you're after, you may need real transmitting tubes, e.g. a pair of 3-500Z's. Please understand that the voltages and currents encountered at those power levels will be lethal in careless hands. -- -TV
<boomer#6877250@none.com> wrote:
> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > output? > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, > which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm > looking into other possible tubes. > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but > after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different > envelope (plate on the top cap). > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from > all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W > RMS (per channel). > >
Go big or go home. http://www.g8wrb.org/tetrodes/
boomer#6877250@none.com prodded the keyboard with:

> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > output? > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 > tubes, which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", > but I'm looking into other possible tubes. > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, > but after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a > different envelope (plate on the top cap). > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), > from all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get > around 120W RMS (per channel).
Have a look for a Trix cinema amplifier, they did one that used a pair of 813's at around 500 W rms 100 volt line out. -- Best Regards: Baron.
Den torsdag den 8. december 2016 kl. 16.49.20 UTC+1 skrev Tauno Voipio:
> On 8.12.16 17:19, boomer#6877250@none.com wrote: > > What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > > output? > > > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, > > which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm > > looking into other possible tubes. > > > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but > > after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different > > envelope (plate on the top cap). > > > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from > > all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W > > RMS (per channel). > > > 807 is the transmitting version of 6L6, so it's no wonder that it looks > similar. > > For the power level you're after, you may need real transmitting tubes, > e.g. a pair of 3-500Z's. Please understand that the voltages and > currents encountered at those power levels will be lethal in careless > hands. >
first hit on google for 500w tube amp http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const9.html
On 12/08/16 07:19, boomer#6877250@none.com so wittily quipped:
> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > output? > > I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull > parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, > which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm > looking into other possible tubes. > > At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but > after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different > envelope (plate on the top cap). > > I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from > all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W > RMS (per channel). >
you'd probably do well with 6550, or KT88 (or maybe 8417 if you can find them) - I think you'd need 6 of them for 500W. Output transformer might be a bit more difficult. this page shows the 1650W for 280W and 6 to 8 output tubes http://www.hammondmfg.com/1608.htm if you're desperate, you could just bridge two of them to get 560W, or tweek the circuit and use the 8 ohm output on 4 ohms and run the risk of frying the transformer at some point...
> > What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage > > output? > > > >
You want a pair of 6427's like WABC used to run http://hawkins.pair.com/wabc.shtml (RMS watts is a misnomer) m
On 8.12.16 18:10, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> Den torsdag den 8. december 2016 kl. 16.49.20 UTC+1 skrev Tauno Voipio: >> On 8.12.16 17:19, boomer#6877250@none.com wrote: >>> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage >>> output? >>> >>> I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull >>> parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, >>> which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm >>> looking into other possible tubes. >>> >>> At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but >>> after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different >>> envelope (plate on the top cap). >>> >>> I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from >>> all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W >>> RMS (per channel). >> >> >> 807 is the transmitting version of 6L6, so it's no wonder that it looks >> similar. >> >> For the power level you're after, you may need real transmitting tubes, >> e.g. a pair of 3-500Z's. Please understand that the voltages and >> currents encountered at those power levels will be lethal in careless >> hands. >> > > first hit on google for 500w tube amp > > http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const9.html >
The maximum plate dissipation of a 813 is 100 W, which is a bit too little for continuous 500 W out. 4 * 813 will stand 400 W on plate, but 2 * 3-500Z will stand 1 kW. -- -TV PS. Been there, done that. I still have a scar due to a transmitter built with 813's.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:43:02 +0200, Tauno Voipio
<tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote:

>On 8.12.16 18:10, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: >> Den torsdag den 8. december 2016 kl. 16.49.20 UTC+1 skrev Tauno Voipio: >>> On 8.12.16 17:19, boomer#6877250@none.com wrote: >>>> What is the most powerful audio output tube, as far as RMS wattage >>>> output? >>>> >>>> I have gotten some powerful sound from four 6L6 tubes in push-pull >>>> parallel. but I want more. I know it's possible to use eight 6L6 tubes, >>>> which I believe is called " push-pull parallel - parallel", but I'm >>>> looking into other possible tubes. >>>> >>>> At one time, I thought the 807 tube was more powerful than the 6L6, but >>>> after careful research, it's almost identical, but with a different >>>> envelope (plate on the top cap). >>>> >>>> I'm looking to get a full 500W RMS (or more) output (per channel), from >>>> all tubes, .... With four 6L6 tubes in PPP, I can only get around 120W >>>> RMS (per channel). >>> >>> >>> 807 is the transmitting version of 6L6, so it's no wonder that it looks >>> similar. >>> >>> For the power level you're after, you may need real transmitting tubes, >>> e.g. a pair of 3-500Z's. Please understand that the voltages and >>> currents encountered at those power levels will be lethal in careless >>> hands. >>> >> >> first hit on google for 500w tube amp >> >> http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const9.html >> > >The maximum plate dissipation of a 813 is 100 W, which is a bit too >little for continuous 500 W out. 4 * 813 will stand 400 W on plate, >but 2 * 3-500Z will stand 1 kW.
<http://www.radiowrench.com/sonic/so02017.html> ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | There is no fool quite like an audiphool.