Forums

No more drones

Started by Jan Panteltje December 1, 2015
No more drones:
 http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/09/02/laser-cannon-that-kills-drones.html

Only 2kW
diodes?

On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:35:38 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> Gave us:

>No more drones: > http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/09/02/laser-cannon-that-kills-drones.html > >Only 2kW >diodes?
Most likely eximer. The idiot at Fox news is not a very bright "tech" reporter. "The laser beam is silent and invisible." No shit, Sherlock. Talk about remarks that reveal how stupid you are (she is). We've known that since the first one at Bell Labs in 1960 from a Ruby rod. I have always hated the use of the term 'drone' too. They are UAVs. A "drone" is specifically a "test target vehicle". They do not attack. a UAV does attack. Big difference. It is like idiots who call a single cell a battery, say "your" when "you're" is the right term, and pronounce RIDiculous as "REEdiculous", and say "dident" instead of "didn't". The younger generations are absolute idiots. "Texting" is partly to blame too. Gives the stupid twerps an excuse to ignore punctuation and grammar. And look how many of them are following that retarded criminal clown Trump. They are the drones! Now go to the other thread and answer the question about the F-35 and your stupid crack there, idiot.
On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 7:23:56 AM UTC-5, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:35:38 GMT, Jan Panteltje > <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> Gave us: > > >No more drones: > > http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/09/02/laser-cannon-that-kills-drones.html > > > >Only 2kW > >diodes? > > Most likely eximer.
Most likely not: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber_laser and the word is excimer, not eximer...
On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 07:23:32 -0500, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
<DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote:

>The younger generations are absolute idiots. "Texting" is >partly to blame too. Gives the stupid twerps an excuse to ignore >punctuation and grammar.
Your axing to much.. --sp -- Best regards, Spehro Pefhany Amazon link for AoE 3rd Edition: http://tinyurl.com/ntrpwu8 Microchip link for 2015 Masters in Phoenix: http://tinyurl.com/l7g2k48
On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 07:23:32 -0500, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
<DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote:

>On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:35:38 GMT, Jan Panteltje ><pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> Gave us: > >>No more drones: >> http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/09/02/laser-cannon-that-kills-drones.html >> >>Only 2kW >>diodes? > > Most likely eximer. > The idiot at Fox news is not a very bright "tech" reporter. >
More likely a semiconductor diode laser. The trend is to use a lot of bar lasers, in the ballpark of 100 watts each, and combine them into a single output beam. They run around 40% efficient. Gas lasers are much less efficient.
On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:15:16 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> Gave us:

>On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 07:23:32 -0500, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno ><DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote: > >>The younger generations are absolute idiots. "Texting" is >>partly to blame too. Gives the stupid twerps an excuse to ignore >>punctuation and grammar. > >Your axing to much.. > >--sp
I wish I could axe all the motherfuckers. They sully the human gene pool and that far worse than any self inebriating drug user ever did. Shove idiots like Chris Christie in the pit too.
>""The laser beam is silent and invisible." > > No shit, Sherlock. Talk about remarks that reveal how stupid you >are >(she is). "
You are such an asshole. you expect the usual idiot to know anything about LASERs ? if they even think they know anytihng in this country it is because of scifi and many of them might think it makes a "HGRR NGRR NGRR" or a "BHRR HRR HRR" sound. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD ANY DIFFERENT ! You expect them to read your fucking mind ? You are getting us nowhere, drop dead shiska.
On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 12:23:56 UTC, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno  wrote:

> I have always hated the use of the term 'drone' too. They are UAVs. > A "drone" is specifically a "test target vehicle". They do not attack. > a UAV does attack. Big difference. It is like idiots who call a single > cell a battery, say "your" when "you're" is the right term, and > pronounce RIDiculous as "REEdiculous", and say "dident" instead of > "didn't". The younger generations are absolute idiots. "Texting" is > partly to blame too. Gives the stupid twerps an excuse to ignore > punctuation and grammar.
Usage changes. Get over it
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:09:24 -0800 (PST), jurb6006@gmail.com Gave us:

> >You are such an asshole.
You are more retarded than she is. Snipped retarded observation of zero fats.
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 02:03:40 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr@gmail.com Gave us:

>On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 12:23:56 UTC, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: > >> I have always hated the use of the term 'drone' too. They are UAVs. >> A "drone" is specifically a "test target vehicle". They do not attack. >> a UAV does attack. Big difference. It is like idiots who call a single >> cell a battery, say "your" when "you're" is the right term, and >> pronounce RIDiculous as "REEdiculous", and say "dident" instead of >> "didn't". The younger generations are absolute idiots. "Texting" is >> partly to blame too. Gives the stupid twerps an excuse to ignore >> punctuation and grammar. > >Usage changes. Get over it
Your retardation level does too. Every time you self inflict more of it upon yourself. It is now and always has been a UAV. A drone is a target vehicle used for testing. It is only idiots like you whom refuse to be formal with your vacuous abuse of the entire planet getting it wrong constantly.