On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:48:17 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:58:23 -0400, Jerry Stuckle ><jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > >>ROFLMAO! > >This "discussion" is much like the Godzilla versus various monsters >movies. Lots of breathing fire, chest beating, loud noises, mass >destruction, and ground pounding. If the monsters could have talked, >the dialog would probably have been similar to this thread. > >At least it's all consistent with the original thread topic. It's all >about noise, I figure."Noise, I figure"? Really? That's *BAD*.> >Please do continue. I'm interested to see who first runs out of >original names, insults, and derogatory remarks. There's already been >far too much repetition, so the end must surely be near.You're not forced to read the thread either.
Antenna Amplifier Noise Figure
Started by ●June 26, 2015
Reply by ●June 29, 20152015-06-29
Reply by ●June 29, 20152015-06-29
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:51:40 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard <pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:42:57 -0400, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno ><DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote: > >>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:34:52 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard >><pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> Gave us: >> >>>It probably would to an utter imbecile such as you. >> >> Relating to you and your invasion of the group, it does mean noise >>factor, just not electronics related. Just like *you* are not >>electronics related or educated. > >C'mon DikeyGurl, remind me of how you came to be named DimBulb.Some of my work. ;-) Larkin gave him the "AlwaysWrong" name and IIRC you gave him "Nymbecile". All appropriate.>I could do with a good laugh!Which DimBulb will undoubtably furnish.
Reply by ●June 29, 20152015-06-29
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:01:05 -0400, krw <krw@nowhere.com> Gave us:>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:54:59 -0400, Jerry Stuckle ><jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > >>On 6/29/2015 2:38 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:05:40 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> Gave us: >>> >>>> ROFLAMO! Another troll response. >>>> >>> Still with the decades outdated gang boy retard lingo... >>> >>>> Now you go running back to your mommy and tell here the mean old guy >>>> spanked your ass. >>> >>> Oh you have seriously dealt me a blow... NOT! What a sad joke you >>> are. >>> >> >>ROFLMAO! You can't even put two thoughts into one message. Not that >>you've shown ANY coherent thoughts at all. > >Hey, Jerry! You scored a DimBulb five-bagger! It's been a while >since anyone has done that well. My personal best is seven but the >record is eight. Those were years ago and DimBulb is slowing down in >its old age, so five is really good.How old did you say you were? I have news for you... Your physical age and your mental age are decades apart. You and Jerominoe both. Bag that, putz.
Reply by ●June 29, 20152015-06-29
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:16:45 -0400, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:01:05 -0400, krw <krw@nowhere.com> Gave us: > >>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:54:59 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >><jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: >> >>>On 6/29/2015 2:38 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:05:40 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> Gave us: >>>> >>>>> ROFLAMO! Another troll response. >>>>> >>>> Still with the decades outdated gang boy retard lingo... >>>> >>>>> Now you go running back to your mommy and tell here the mean old guy >>>>> spanked your ass. >>>> >>>> Oh you have seriously dealt me a blow... NOT! What a sad joke you >>>> are. >>>> >>> >>>ROFLMAO! You can't even put two thoughts into one message. Not that >>>you've shown ANY coherent thoughts at all. >> >>Hey, Jerry! You scored a DimBulb five-bagger! It's been a while >>since anyone has done that well. My personal best is seven but the >>record is eight. Those were years ago and DimBulb is slowing down in >>its old age, so five is really good. > > How old did you say you were?Old enough to recognize a dim bulb, DimBulb. You aren't hard to recognize, though.> I have news for you... Your physical age and your mental age are >decades apart. You and Jerominoe both.You have nothing, AlwaysWrong.> Bag that, putz.It's clear that you don't like the facts. After all, you are AlwaysWrong.
Reply by ●June 29, 20152015-06-29
On 6/29/2015 9:11 PM, krw wrote:> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:10:36 -0400, Jerry Stuckle > <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > >> On 6/28/2015 10:56 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:33:42 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> Gave us: >>> >>>> ================== >>>> Remove the "x" from my email address >>> >>> You mean like this... >>> >>> jstuckle@attglobal.net >>> >>> Too pussified to post it? Don't code it in either idiot. >>> >>> Wake up, little suzzie. Oh that's right... you are as awake as an >>> idiot with only two functioning neurons can be. Good job, jackass. >>> >> >> I just don't like SPAM. However, I at least use an email address which >> is easily decoded (read CAPTCHA), unlike the non-existent email address >> you use. > > Totally different topic... > > Isnt' attglobal.net going away in a couple of days? I have an account > but it was supposed to go out of business in March, then had a > commutation to July 1. Have they changed their mind again? >Yes and no - the existing service is going away, but you can still get am email address through them (for around $3.95/mo IIRC). Don't know if I'll go for it or not - I've had this email since it was on ibm.net but haven't used the modem or wireless access for years (I used to use it for wireless access at Starbucks, but they've gone free now, also). I hate to give it up for sentimental reasons, but the only thing I get on it is spam anyway. But I'm not going to give out my business email here, either. Too many trolls.>> What are you afraid of - maybe your mommy might find out what crap >> you're posting on usenet? >> >> Give it up - you have zero respectability on usenet - here or anywhere >> else I've found. But then that's expected from someone less mature than >> a third-grader who needs serious psychiatric help. >> >> I hope your mommy gets it for you. You will be much happier. > > No, DimBulb will never be happy. >Yea, I think you're right, because he'll never ask his mommy to get him help. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Reply by ●June 30, 20152015-06-30
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:18:11 -0400, krw <krw@nowhere.com> wrote:>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:51:40 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard ><pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:42:57 -0400, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno >><DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:34:52 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard >>><pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>It probably would to an utter imbecile such as you. >>> >>> Relating to you and your invasion of the group, it does mean noise >>>factor, just not electronics related. Just like *you* are not >>>electronics related or educated. >> >>C'mon DikeyGurl, remind me of how you came to be named DimBulb. > >Some of my work. ;-) Larkin gave him the "AlwaysWrong" name and IIRC >you gave him "Nymbecile". All appropriate. > >>I could do with a good laugh! > >Which DimBulb will undoubtably furnish.Yes, indeed! Its regular explosions are a reliable source of amusement. What I find so unbelievable is the idiot never learns! I suppose it is an easy target, but I'm not proud. Long live AlwaysWrong, DimBulb and Nymbecile!
Reply by ●June 30, 20152015-06-30
On 6/29/15 7:48 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:58:23 -0400, Jerry Stuckle > <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > >> ROFLMAO! > > This "discussion" is much like the Godzilla versus various monsters > movies. Lots of breathing fire, chest beating, loud noises, mass > destruction, and ground pounding. If the monsters could have talked, > the dialog would probably have been similar to this thread. > > At least it's all consistent with the original thread topic. It's all > about noise, I figure. > > Please do continue. I'm interested to see who first runs out of > original names, insults, and derogatory remarks. There's already been > far too much repetition, so the end must surely be near. > > >At least it's not as bad as Hitler. Er, the Funkcorps. Or something.
Reply by ●June 30, 20152015-06-30
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:47:44 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:>On 6/29/2015 9:11 PM, krw wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:10:36 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> On 6/28/2015 10:56 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:33:42 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> Gave us: >>>> >>>>> ================== >>>>> Remove the "x" from my email address >>>> >>>> You mean like this... >>>> >>>> jstuckle@attglobal.net >>>> >>>> Too pussified to post it? Don't code it in either idiot. >>>> >>>> Wake up, little suzzie. Oh that's right... you are as awake as an >>>> idiot with only two functioning neurons can be. Good job, jackass. >>>> >>> >>> I just don't like SPAM. However, I at least use an email address which >>> is easily decoded (read CAPTCHA), unlike the non-existent email address >>> you use. >> >> Totally different topic... >> >> Isnt' attglobal.net going away in a couple of days? I have an account >> but it was supposed to go out of business in March, then had a >> commutation to July 1. Have they changed their mind again? >> > >Yes and no - the existing service is going away, but you can still get >am email address through them (for around $3.95/mo IIRC). Don't know if >I'll go for it or not - I've had this email since it was on ibm.net but >haven't used the modem or wireless access for years (I used to use it >for wireless access at Starbucks, but they've gone free now, also).Same here but I thought they'd support private email domains, not att.biz. I decided to get my domain and email support elsewhere. There was no advantage to use AT&T anymore. Since March, I've just been forwarding everything from my at&t IDs to my domain. If I could have kept my AT&T IDs, I doubt I would have bothered.>I hate to give it up for sentimental reasons, but the only thing I get >on it is spam anyway. But I'm not going to give out my business email >here, either. Too many trolls.Understood. I get around 400 spams a day on mine.>>> What are you afraid of - maybe your mommy might find out what crap >>> you're posting on usenet? >>> >>> Give it up - you have zero respectability on usenet - here or anywhere >>> else I've found. But then that's expected from someone less mature than >>> a third-grader who needs serious psychiatric help. >>> >>> I hope your mommy gets it for you. You will be much happier. >> >> No, DimBulb will never be happy. >> > >Yea, I think you're right, because he'll never ask his mommy to get him >help.
Reply by ●June 30, 20152015-06-30
On 6/30/2015 1:07 PM, krw wrote:> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:47:44 -0400, Jerry Stuckle > <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > >> On 6/29/2015 9:11 PM, krw wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:10:36 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/28/2015 10:56 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:33:42 -0400, Jerry Stuckle >>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> Gave us: >>>>> >>>>>> ================== >>>>>> Remove the "x" from my email address >>>>> >>>>> You mean like this... >>>>> >>>>> jstuckle@attglobal.net >>>>> >>>>> Too pussified to post it? Don't code it in either idiot. >>>>> >>>>> Wake up, little suzzie. Oh that's right... you are as awake as an >>>>> idiot with only two functioning neurons can be. Good job, jackass. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I just don't like SPAM. However, I at least use an email address which >>>> is easily decoded (read CAPTCHA), unlike the non-existent email address >>>> you use. >>> >>> Totally different topic... >>> >>> Isnt' attglobal.net going away in a couple of days? I have an account >>> but it was supposed to go out of business in March, then had a >>> commutation to July 1. Have they changed their mind again? >>> >> >> Yes and no - the existing service is going away, but you can still get >> am email address through them (for around $3.95/mo IIRC). Don't know if >> I'll go for it or not - I've had this email since it was on ibm.net but >> haven't used the modem or wireless access for years (I used to use it >> for wireless access at Starbucks, but they've gone free now, also). > > Same here but I thought they'd support private email domains, not > att.biz. I decided to get my domain and email support elsewhere. > There was no advantage to use AT&T anymore. Since March, I've just > been forwarding everything from my at&t IDs to my domain. If I could > have kept my AT&T IDs, I doubt I would have bothered. >I didn't forward mine - just kept a separate box going in Thunderbird. Easier to handle the SPAM that way :)>> I hate to give it up for sentimental reasons, but the only thing I get >> on it is spam anyway. But I'm not going to give out my business email >> here, either. Too many trolls. > > Understood. I get around 400 spams a day on mine. >Yes, all I get on that email is SPAM nowadays, too. Not 400 a day, though, thank goodness! -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
