Electronics-Related.com
Forums

LED reference current source

Started by John Larkin September 9, 2012
The plots do show the yellow is the stiffest.


On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

> >Has anybody done this? > >https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG
Curious idea, why don't i see any indication of a light tight box around it? ?-)
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:50:07 -0700, josephkk
<joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>Has anybody done this? >> >>https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG > >Curious idea, why don't i see any indication of a light tight box around >it? > >?-)
Because there isn't one? The LED is a voltage reference and a pilot light. What's the schematic symbol for a light-tight box? -- John Larkin Highland Technology Inc www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com Precision electronic instrumentation Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators Custom timing and laser controllers Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:05:40 -0700, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>Has anybody done this? >> >>https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG > > >OK, here's some numbers. > >https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Current_Sources/LED_Isrc_bb.JPG > >https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Current_Sources/LED_Isrc_data.JPG > >The orange looks good for my application. I don't understand what's >going on with the green. > >The supply regulation isn't as good as a bandgap or something, but is >OK for what I'm doing. > >There's zero evidence of light sensitivity. I can blast my >mini-maglite, or the Mantis illuminator, into the LED and nothing >happens.
Sunlight on green LEDs is used for solar tracker applications, turns up on various DIY sites. Grant.
On 9/10/2012 10:01 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2:38 am, bitrex <bit...@de.lete.earthlink.net> wrote: >> On 9/10/2012 11:14 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:48:23 -0400, Phil Hobbs >>> <pcdhSpamMeSensel...@electrooptical.net> wrote: >> >>>> "langw...@fonz.dk" wrote: >> >>>>> On Sep 10, 3:50 am, John Larkin >>>>> <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>> Has anybody done this? >> >>>>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG >> >>>>> seen it done since forever for audio amps, I believe some claim they >>>>> are >>>>> also less noisy than regular diodes, just remember to shield the LED >>>>> from light >> >>>>> http://www.ka-electronics.com/Images/pdf/Junction_Temperature_LED_Tem... >> >>>>> looks like somewhere between red and UV will get close to zero tempco >> >>>>> -Lasse >> >>>> Good paper, thanks for the reference. >> >>>> Cheers >> >>>> Phil Hobbs >> >>> But an LED forward is not "stiff", so where's the benefit? Or is this >>> just one of those "fun things to do"? >> >>> ...Jim Thompson >> >> An interesting aside: About a year ago I built a simple "LED curve >> tracer" that used an i2c DAC, an Arduino and some PC scripting to >> automatically generate pretty plots of the I-V characteristics of LEDs, >> and ran tests on just about every LED I could get my hands on. >> >> Medium intensity diffuse yellow 3mm LEDs, like this one: >> >> http://www.taydaelectronics.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/2... >> >> seemed to have a remarkably "stiff" forward voltage across a wide range >> of currents. On a log-linear plot of current v. voltage, with current >> on the x axis, the slope of the line was very slight over operating >> currents from microamps to about 35 mA. >> >> Here's the plot of the yellow LED:http://cdn.instructables.com/FD3/IS7A/GOW48BVH/FD3IS7AGOW48BVH.LARGE.jpg >> >> For comparison, here's a diffuse red:http://cdn.instructables.com/FRA/EIKZ/GOW3YQLI/FRAEIKZGOW3YQLI.LARGE.jpg >> >> and a high intensity green:http://cdn.instructables.com/F1L/MDGE/GOW48BUA/F1LMDGEGOW48BUA.LARGE.jpg > > Strange data, and an implausible fitting function. You'd expect the > LED voltage to be a logarithmic function of current at low currents, > then start going up faster at high currents as the ohmic resistances > became significant. > > You "exponential" fit is crappy at low currents, okay at medium > currents and crappy again at high currents. You need to fit a more > physically realistic function to your data. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Nijmegen >
Yes, I'm aware of the shortcomings of the fit. As you say, at high currents ohmic resistance causes a deviation from log/exponential behavior. At low current, there's deviation due to base current errors from the current source feeding the LED, which was just a jellybean op amp and a couple of transistors. There are also errors due to Early effect, and the fact that in this setup the current is not sensed directly. In this case I wanted the measurement circuit to be as straightforward as possible for Arduino users/hobbyists who might not be too well versed in electronics. With a little work it should be straightforward to develop a much better current source for LED characteristic measurement, and the test firmware and script could accommodate it with very little modification.
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes:

> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:50:07 -0700, josephkk > <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>Has anybody done this? >>> >>>https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG >> >>Curious idea, why don't i see any indication of a light tight box around >>it? >> >>?-) > > Because there isn't one? The LED is a voltage reference and a pilot > light.
Hey, I used to be able to crash a quartz-windowed 8749 microcontroller by taking a picture of the machine it was in with a flash camera! :) -- John Devereux
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:01:02 -0700, Jon Kirwan
<jonk@infinitefactors.org> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>Has anybody done this? >> >>https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG > >Must have been, since I just saw some discussion about it on >LTspice group less than a month ago. > >Jon
Just doing a few searches found these: http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/RADELECT/MEASNOIS/NOISMEA1.HTM Also, AN-211 from Analog Devices discussing the use of a pair of back to back 2N3904 BE junctions zenered to supply a 15V reference with very little noise (bypassed with 10uF tants.) See Figure 3 on it, Q14 through Q17. And check out DIYAudio, from 2002: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/parts/35821-some-noise-measurements-leds-z= ener-diodes.html Jon
On Sunday, September 9, 2012 7:03:48 PM UTC-7, Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:50:25 -0700, John Larkin > > <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> >Has anybody done this?
> >https://dl.dropbox.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Isrc_LED.JPG > > > > What is it supposed to buy you? Does the LED forward TC match a > > Silicon Vbe TC?
Both the LED and the transistor have the same 0.3% per Celsius temperature sensitivity, and nothing cancels. The current through the resistor would only remain constant if the resistor had a compensatory thermal characteristic, and was heatsinked to the other devices. There's also the issue of photons getting at the sensitive part of the LED junction. Photosensitive references: just say NO. A way to make a temperature-dependent diode drop into a non temperature dependent reference is well known: it's the bandgap reference.
On 10/09/2012 21:15, Jon Kirwan wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:11:10 +0100, Martin Brown > <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 10/09/2012 08:26, Tim Williams wrote:
>>> I once had a chemistry lab about bandgap. We took a battery, LED and >>> styrofoam cup of LN2, and proceeded to observe the color change upon >>> putting them together. Theory from lecture said, cold --> crystal >>> shrinks --> wavelength shrinks. >> >> That LN2 demo was always much more fun with the early generation of low >> efficiency red LEDs. The quantum efficiency rockets up when the lattice >> is cooled and thermal vibrations are decreased much more rigid lattice. >> Unfortunately they die after a few hundred cycles or less. >> >> I don't recall seeing the wavelength shift perceptably though the >> brightness changed by a very significant amount. Admitedly on a red led >> this could be both quantum efficiency and it producing shorter >> wavelength red light which is perceived as bright. >> <snip> > > This may be due to human color perception sensitivities to > wavelength shift in the red region, which is quite poor per > unit wavelength shift. Discrimination between nearby > wavelengths in the red region is not nearly as good as > elsewhere. Did you use a spectrophotometer?
No. It was done as a public demonstration of early light emitting semiconductors and was entirely qualitative. I will try it with a spectrograph next time I am near some LN2 (and have spare time). -- Regards, Martin Brown
On Monday, September 10, 2012 7:53:37 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

[about light sensitivity of a LED used as voltage reference]

> Well, I measured it this afternoon. There is no discernable > > photoelectric effect, even with intense illumination. I didn't expect > > any, and Phil didn't expect any.
When I put a light chopper on a laser and detect a weak response signal with a lock-in amplifier, the sensitivity will be much more clear. Pay the extra nickel, use a REAL reference. LM4140adj is suitable, just add two resistors (the op amp is built in).