Electronics-Related.com
Forums

Zener noise / oscillations

Started by Robert Baer July 23, 2012
On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:12:40 +0100) it happened John Devereux
<john@devereux.me.uk> wrote in <87k3xu2ygn.fsf@devereux.me.uk>:

>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:53:16 +0100) it happened John Devereux >> <john@devereux.me.uk> wrote in <87sjci37oz.fsf@devereux.me.uk>: >> >>>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes: >>> >>>> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:16:24 -0700) it happened Robert Baer >>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in >>>> <BeCdnSnrv6HGlZDNnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.localnet>: >>>> >>>>> Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near >>>>>the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). >>>>> But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) >>>>>then _watch_out_! >>>>> Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to >>>>>oscillation. >>>>> The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb >>>>>sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and >>>>>probability increases (do NOT want to say "frequency" as that gives >>>>>wrong impression). >>>>> Then this "converts" to random noise. >>>>> Eventually, there are "bursts" of NO noise. Then at higher current, >>>>>noise bursts decrease in "frequency" and amplitude. >>>>> >>>>> That is what i see in general. >>>>> However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees >>>>>little if any noise or spikes mentioned. >>>>> NOW for the question: >>>>> How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or >>>>>will not oscillate? >>>>>* >>>>> Yes, there are zeners made for low noise and those have a much lower >>>>>spec current, BUT i cannot afford to have the factory dig the silicon >>>>>mines, etc much less the high $$. >>>> >>>> I do not normally use zeners for reference, just for over voltage protection. >>>> For reference you probably want bandgap based chips. >>>> There are some very low power reference chips. >>> >>>Bandgap ones are more convenient. But the very best semiconductor >>>references in terms of noise and stability are those based on zeners. >> >> At 2-50uA? > >Not as far as I know - usually about 5mA and ~6-7V. Like I said, not >very convenient.
Yes, I remember those (Intermetal IIRC) had a zener and Ge transistor that used together (zener in emitter) had exactly a zero Tc. Indeed about 5 or 6V, do not remember the exact value. For the rest the Tc is never really flat for zeners AFAIK...
>-- > >John Devereux >
On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:16:24 AM UTC-4, Robert Baer wrote:
> Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near > the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). > But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) > then _watch_out_! > Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to > oscillation. > The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb > sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and > probability increases (do NOT want to say &quot;frequency&quot; as that gives > wrong impression). > Then this &quot;converts&quot; to random noise. > Eventually, there are &quot;bursts&quot; of NO noise. Then at higher current, > noise bursts decrease in &quot;frequency&quot; and amplitude. > > That is what i see in general. > However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees > little if any noise or spikes mentioned. > NOW for the question: > How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or > will not oscillate? > *
That is not noise, you have inadvertently built a negative resistance oscillator: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207219408926109#preview
On Jul 23, 4:16=A0am, Robert Baer <robertb...@localnet.com> wrote:
> =A0 =A0Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near > the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). > =A0 =A0But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) > then _watch_out_! > =A0 =A0Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to > oscillation. > =A0 =A0The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb > sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and > probability increases (do NOT want to say "frequency" as that gives > wrong impression). > =A0 =A0Then this "converts" to random noise. > =A0 =A0Eventually, there are "bursts" of NO noise. Then at higher current=
,
> noise bursts decrease in "frequency" and amplitude. > > =A0 =A0That is what i see in general. > =A0 =A0However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees > little if any noise or spikes mentioned. > =A0 =A0NOW for the question: > =A0 =A0How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or > will not oscillate? > * > =A0 =A0Yes, there are zeners made for low noise and those have a much low=
er
> spec current, BUT i cannot afford to have the factory dig the silicon > mines, etc much less the high $$.
What sort of voltage range are you talking about. My limited experience would suggest that at lower voltage (8-16 V) the low current noise is very variable piece to piece. At higher voltage the low current noise is larger and more consistent And above 20 (something) Volts there maybe a point in the I-V curve that can lead to oscillations. Though all of this depends on the power rating of the diode too. George H.
On Jul 23, 1:44=A0pm, bloggs.fredbloggs.f...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:16:24 AM UTC-4, Robert Baer wrote: > > Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near > > the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). > > =A0 =A0But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA=
)
> > then _watch_out_! > > =A0 =A0Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject =
to
> > oscillation. > > =A0 =A0The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb > > sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and > > probability increases (do NOT want to say &quot;frequency&quot; as that=
gives
> > wrong impression). > > =A0 =A0Then this &quot;converts&quot; to random noise. > > =A0 =A0Eventually, there are &quot;bursts&quot; of NO noise. Then at hi=
gher current,
> > noise bursts decrease in &quot;frequency&quot; and amplitude. > > > =A0 =A0That is what i see in general. > > =A0 =A0However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one se=
es
> > little if any noise or spikes mentioned. > > =A0 =A0NOW for the question: > > =A0 =A0How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not o=
r
> > will not oscillate? > > * > > That is not noise, you have inadvertently built a negative resistance osc=
illator:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207219408926109#previe= w Woah, a 4kV zener! You don't use those every day. (at least I don't) George H.
On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:17:12 PM UTC-4, George Herold wrote:
> On Jul 23, 1:44=A0pm, bloggs.fredbloggs.f...@gmail.com wrote: > &gt; On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:16:24 AM UTC-4, Robert Baer wrote: > &gt; &gt; Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or n=
ear
> &gt; &gt; the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA =
to 500uA)
> &gt; &gt; then _watch_out_! > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and =
subject to
> &gt; &gt; oscillation. > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like ra=
ndumb
> &gt; &gt; sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplit=
ude and
> &gt; &gt; probability increases (do NOT want to say &amp;quot;frequency&a=
mp;quot; as that gives
> &gt; &gt; wrong impression). > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Then this &amp;quot;converts&amp;quot; to random noise. > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Eventually, there are &amp;quot;bursts&amp;quot; of NO n=
oise. Then at higher current,
> &gt; &gt; noise bursts decrease in &amp;quot;frequency&amp;quot; and ampl=
itude.
> &gt; > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0That is what i see in general. > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer=
, one sees
> &gt; &gt; little if any noise or spikes mentioned. > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0NOW for the question: > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they =
do not or
> &gt; &gt; will not oscillate? > &gt; &gt; * > &gt; > &gt; That is not noise, you have inadvertently built a negative resistanc=
e oscillator:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207219408926109#p= review
>=20 > Woah, a 4kV zener! You don&#39;t use those every day. > (at least I don&#39;t) >=20 > George H.
You might note they extended the observations to the low voltage diodes too= .
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:12:40 +0100, John Devereux
<john@devereux.me.uk> wrote:

>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes: > >> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:53:16 +0100) it happened John Devereux >> <john@devereux.me.uk> wrote in <87sjci37oz.fsf@devereux.me.uk>: >> >>>Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes: >>> >>>> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:16:24 -0700) it happened Robert Baer >>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in >>>> <BeCdnSnrv6HGlZDNnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.localnet>: >>>> >>>>> Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near >>>>>the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). >>>>> But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) >>>>>then _watch_out_! >>>>> Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to >>>>>oscillation. >>>>> The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb >>>>>sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and >>>>>probability increases (do NOT want to say "frequency" as that gives >>>>>wrong impression). >>>>> Then this "converts" to random noise. >>>>> Eventually, there are "bursts" of NO noise. Then at higher current, >>>>>noise bursts decrease in "frequency" and amplitude. >>>>> >>>>> That is what i see in general. >>>>> However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees >>>>>little if any noise or spikes mentioned. >>>>> NOW for the question: >>>>> How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or >>>>>will not oscillate? >>>>>* >>>>> Yes, there are zeners made for low noise and those have a much lower >>>>>spec current, BUT i cannot afford to have the factory dig the silicon >>>>>mines, etc much less the high $$. >>>> >>>> I do not normally use zeners for reference, just for over voltage protection. >>>> For reference you probably want bandgap based chips. >>>> There are some very low power reference chips. >>> >>>Bandgap ones are more convenient. But the very best semiconductor >>>references in terms of noise and stability are those based on zeners. >> >> At 2-50uA? > >Not as far as I know - usually about 5mA and ~6-7V. Like I said, not >very convenient.
I've done bandgaps on CMOS processes... 100uA total operating current. My bag of tricks includes producing other voltages than the standard 1.25V/2.5V... handy when you have a low voltage supply... I have one architecture that goes stable and flat output of +1V, when VCC=1.2V ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
On Jul 23, 2:37=A0pm, bloggs.fredbloggs.f...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:17:12 PM UTC-4, George Herold wrote: > > On Jul 23, 1:44=A0pm, bloggs.fredbloggs.f...@gmail.com wrote: > > &gt; On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:16:24 AM UTC-4, Robert Baer wrote: > > &gt; &gt; Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or=
near
> > &gt; &gt; the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10u=
A to 500uA)
> > &gt; &gt; then _watch_out_! > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy an=
d subject to
> > &gt; &gt; oscillation. > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like =
randumb
> > &gt; &gt; sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the ampl=
itude and
> > &gt; &gt; probability increases (do NOT want to say &amp;quot;frequency=
&amp;quot; as that gives
> > &gt; &gt; wrong impression). > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Then this &amp;quot;converts&amp;quot; to random noise=
.
> > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0Eventually, there are &amp;quot;bursts&amp;quot; of NO=
noise. Then at higher current,
> > &gt; &gt; noise bursts decrease in &amp;quot;frequency&amp;quot; and am=
plitude.
> > &gt; > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0That is what i see in general. > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve trac=
er, one sees
> > &gt; &gt; little if any noise or spikes mentioned. > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0NOW for the question: > > &gt; &gt; =A0 =A0How can one test these particular zeners to ensure the=
y do not or
> > &gt; &gt; will not oscillate? > > &gt; &gt; * > > &gt; > > &gt; That is not noise, you have inadvertently built a negative resista=
nce oscillator:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207219408926109= #preview
> > > Woah, a 4kV zener! =A0You don&#39;t use those every day. > > (at least I don&#39;t) > > > George H. > > You might note they extended the observations to the low voltage diodes t=
oo. Oh,I don't have access to the whole paper. I was looking at some data sheets (a while back) and zeners in the 25V-30V range looked like they might oscillate at the right current. (I guess the last thing the OP wants is an oscillator.) George H.
You can heat treat zener diodes (by passing a lot of current through them) =
for use in saw-tooth oscillator circuits. Obviously if you that you are cau=
sing poorly controlled physical changes of the semiconductor properties. Yo=
u know a TL431 shunt regulator costs so little these days that you should u=
se it in your circuits in preference to a zener diode. It is so much better=
 and 1960's style voltage regulation is not such a great idea these days. 
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:16:24 -0700) it happened Robert Baer > <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in > <BeCdnSnrv6HGlZDNnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.localnet>: > >> Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near >> the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). >> But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) >> then _watch_out_! >> Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to >> oscillation. >> The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb >> sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and >> probability increases (do NOT want to say "frequency" as that gives >> wrong impression). >> Then this "converts" to random noise. >> Eventually, there are "bursts" of NO noise. Then at higher current, >> noise bursts decrease in "frequency" and amplitude. >> >> That is what i see in general. >> However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees >> little if any noise or spikes mentioned. >> NOW for the question: >> How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or >> will not oscillate? >> * >> Yes, there are zeners made for low noise and those have a much lower >> spec current, BUT i cannot afford to have the factory dig the silicon >> mines, etc much less the high $$. > > I do not normally use zeners for reference, just for over voltage protection. > For reference you probably want bandgap based chips. > There are some very low power reference chips. >
Reference? Said nothing about that; app is for voltage regulation but zener pass current must be low.
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:53:16 +0100) it happened John Devereux > <john@devereux.me.uk> wrote in<87sjci37oz.fsf@devereux.me.uk>: > >> Jan Panteltje<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> On a sunny day (Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:16:24 -0700) it happened Robert Baer >>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in >>> <BeCdnSnrv6HGlZDNnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.localnet>: >>> >>>> Zeners all seem to behave: quiet, no oscillation IF run at or near >>>> the spec current (usually in the tens of mA). >>>> But, if one needs to run them at low currents (say 10uA to 500uA) >>>> then _watch_out_! >>>> Some brands at certain voltages are extremely noisy and subject to >>>> oscillation. >>>> The waveforms seen at low currents (2-50uA) look like randumb >>>> sawtooth generation, and as the current is increased the amplitude and >>>> probability increases (do NOT want to say "frequency" as that gives >>>> wrong impression). >>>> Then this "converts" to random noise. >>>> Eventually, there are "bursts" of NO noise. Then at higher current, >>>> noise bursts decrease in "frequency" and amplitude. >>>> >>>> That is what i see in general. >>>> However, i have found two zeners that, on a curve tracer, one sees >>>> little if any noise or spikes mentioned. >>>> NOW for the question: >>>> How can one test these particular zeners to ensure they do not or >>>> will not oscillate? >>>> * >>>> Yes, there are zeners made for low noise and those have a much lower >>>> spec current, BUT i cannot afford to have the factory dig the silicon >>>> mines, etc much less the high $$. >>> >>> I do not normally use zeners for reference, just for over voltage protection. >>> For reference you probably want bandgap based chips. >>> There are some very low power reference chips. >> >> Bandgap ones are more convenient. But the very best semiconductor >> references in terms of noise and stability are those based on zeners. > > At 2-50uA?
My app is only for voltage regulation, not reference purposes; zener current to range from 2-500uA. Gotta be cheeeep 1-3 cents.