It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top". Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys systemwide macros in windows.
Use resistor instead of regulator?
Started by ●January 30, 2021
Reply by ●February 11, 20212021-02-11
Reply by ●February 12, 20212021-02-12
On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:> It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top". > > Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys > systemwide macros in windows.Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it? What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in the body of the post. I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act. Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster? And should I top post when I do it? Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a proper post with a quote? Mikek -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Reply by ●February 12, 20212021-02-12
Because. This group is starving for activity... -- amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail > From: amdx <amdx@knology.net> > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics > Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator? > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:58 -0600 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Lines: 27 > Message-ID: <s05vbr$1nn$1@dont-email.me> > References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me> <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <s03mtt$l30$1@dont-email.me> <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:20:59 -0000 (UTC) > Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="43ff3bc1054611fd024c42d1e5dc122c"; logging-data="1783"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nI0UPLjX+uyhlM6Vcp3CA" > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 > Cancel-Lock: sha1:WK9CNOAcu2WyILulMJNe8clUum8= > In-Reply-To: <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me> > X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > Content-Language: en-US > X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210212-4, 02/12/2021), Outbound message > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55532 > > On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote: >> It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top". >> >> Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys >> systemwide macros in windows. > > Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it? > > What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in > the body of the post. > > I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act. > > Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster? > > And should I top post when I do it? > > Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a proper > post with a quote? > > Mikek > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > >
Reply by ●February 12, 20212021-02-12
amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:> On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote: >> It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top". >> >> Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who >> enjoys systemwide macros in windows. > > Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?The appearance on this end of "why" looks to be: "to be irritating".> What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in > the body of the post.The appearance given out, when the pattern happens, is that the Mr Hyde personality half of Mr Doe does it for the purpose of irritation of the poster to which Mr Doe has chosen to "troll".> I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.There seems to be no advantage. Other than to overtely be irritating.> Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster? > > And should I top post when I do it? > > Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a > proper post with a quote?Except that when Mr Doe is operating from his Dr Jeckyl personality half, he is quite capable of proper quoting, quote trimming, avoiding quoting headers, and bottom posting. Implying he can write a macro to do a proper post. There are at least two explanations for this: One - Mr Doe has a proper voice activated macro that can quote properly and bottom post -- which implies that the header quoting top posting Mr Hyde personality is a deliberate choice on his part. Two - Mr Doe only uses his voice activated macro when trolling. Which is, again, a deliberate choice on his part when the Mr Hyde personality is activated. Both boil down to deliberate choices on Mr Doe's part. So I submit that he deliberatly chooses the top posting, header quoting, Mr Hyde version to be irritating to the person to which he is responding.
Reply by ●February 12, 20212021-02-12
Nobody forces anybody to read anybody else's posts on USENET. The idea USENET posts must conform to some standard is nothing but a ridiculous troll. You can cope with it or you can ignore it. A netcop wannabe troll starved for attention... -- Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com> wrote:> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail > From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com> > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics > Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator? > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:30:09 +0000 (UTC) > Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server > Lines: 51 > Message-ID: <s066u1$1iip$1@gioia.aioe.org> > References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me> <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <s03mtt$l30$1@dont-email.me> <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me> <s05vbr$1nn$1@dont-email.me> > NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org > X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org > X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 > Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55534 > > amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote: >> On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote: >>> It takes a two syllable voice command... "on top". >>> >>> Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who >>> enjoys systemwide macros in windows. >> >> Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it? > > The appearance on this end of "why" looks to be: "to be irritating". > >> What do you think you are doing to the person who's header you put in >> the body of the post. > > The appearance given out, when the pattern happens, is that the Mr Hyde > personality half of Mr Doe does it for the purpose of irritation of the > poster to which Mr Doe has chosen to "troll". > >> I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act. > > There seems to be no advantage. Other than to overtely be irritating. > >> Is it something I should start doing when I'm disagree with a poster? >> >> And should I top post when I do it? >> >> Or, am I over thinking this and you can't write a macro to do a >> proper post with a quote? > > Except that when Mr Doe is operating from his Dr Jeckyl personality > half, he is quite capable of proper quoting, quote trimming, avoiding > quoting headers, and bottom posting. Implying he can write a macro to > do a proper post. > > There are at least two explanations for this: > > One - Mr Doe has a proper voice activated macro that can quote properly > and bottom post -- which implies that the header quoting top posting Mr > Hyde personality is a deliberate choice on his part. > > Two - Mr Doe only uses his voice activated macro when trolling. Which > is, again, a deliberate choice on his part when the Mr Hyde personality > is activated. > > Both boil down to deliberate choices on Mr Doe's part. > > So I submit that he deliberatly chooses the top posting, header > quoting, Mr Hyde version to be irritating to the person to which he is > responding. > > > >
Reply by ●February 12, 20212021-02-12
On 2021-02-12, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:> Nobody forces anybody to read anybody else's posts on USENET. The idea > USENET posts must conform to some standard is nothing but a ridiculous > troll. You can cope with it or you can ignore it.Generally your mangled posts consist entirely of untruths. (with the exception of the quoted part), this one seems to have some truth however. -- Jasen.
