On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:35:09 +0200, Johann Klammer
<klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> wrote:
>Specifically the LNK616 flyback regulator.
>They have 1N4007 in their dataheets/appnotes.
>But the 1N4007s trrs are all over the place.
>Often around 1us. The regulator has a minimum on-time of
>700ns, and really does not like surge currents.
>What are better specced alternatives?
Slower diodes are used in the clamp for a reason.
That said, I've never seen 4000 series specified there.
In4937 (from memory) often used with trrs in the >500ns
range. Don't use ultrafast parts there. Leakage energy
is intended to be applied into the load during clamping,
rather than being burnt.
RL
Reply by Johann Klammer●September 27, 20222022-09-27
On 09/27/2022 09:33 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Johann Klammer wrote:
>> Specifically the LNK616 flyback regulator.
>> They have 1N4007 in their dataheets/appnotes.
>> But the 1N4007s trrs are all over the place.
>> Often around 1us. The regulator has a minimum on-time of
>> 700ns, and really does not like surge currents.
>> What are better specced alternatives?
>>
>
> How about
> <https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/comchip-technology/US1M-HF/12713336> ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
thank you.. forgot to say: it's all on perfboard.
will use UF4007.
Reply by Phil Hobbs●September 27, 20222022-09-27
Johann Klammer wrote:
> Specifically the LNK616 flyback regulator.
> They have 1N4007 in their dataheets/appnotes.
> But the 1N4007s trrs are all over the place.
> Often around 1us. The regulator has a minimum on-time of
> 700ns, and really does not like surge currents.
> What are better specced alternatives?
>
Reply by Johann Klammer●September 27, 20222022-09-27
Specifically the LNK616 flyback regulator.
They have 1N4007 in their dataheets/appnotes.
But the 1N4007s trrs are all over the place.
Often around 1us. The regulator has a minimum on-time of
700ns, and really does not like surge currents.
What are better specced alternatives?