John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:t6nspf$7bp$2@dont-email.me: 

> Mutual blocking is not about "filter[ing] those you wish to not
> see". 
> 
> Always Wrong, the reactionary foulmouthed group idiot, has no idea
> what mutual blocking is about, but as usual the ignorant poster
> pretends to be an expert... 

  The top posting Usenet total retard and village idiot John Dope
wants to play semantics now.

 Nice try punk.  What you want is cancellation of someone's "right" 
to post, regardless of your reasons, you could not be more stupid.

  They are called OPEN forums for a reason and ANY CASE where YOU as 
a reader of an open forum wishes to not see the posts or responses of 
a given individual, the onus remains ON YOU to use... you guessed 
it...
FILTERS.  That is why they are provided.

  You dim witted repsonse popped your IQ down another ten points, 
John Dope.
With that, your blatant senility, and your membership in the Trump 
cult, you do not have many left.

Mutual blocking is not about "filter[ing] those you wish to not see". 

Always Wrong, the reactionary foulmouthed group idiot, has no idea what
mutual blocking is about, but as usual the ignorant poster pretends to be
an expert... 


DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

> John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6maua$1r5$2@dont-
> email.me:
> 
>> I and maybe others have tried. One forum was receptive, another forum
>> wasn't (with an illogical justification). 
> 
> Go to reddit, you fucking retard.
> 
>   Top rated, high technology, even post suspension penalties and bans 
> by group founders if they don't like you or your mouth.
> 
>   Even there, however, it is individual filter based.  The onus is on 
> you to filter those you wish to not see.
> 
>   Group founders and reddit managers, however can shitcan your ass in 
> various ways and for various reasons, including an asshole complaining 
> instead of using his or her or it's filter.
> 
>  John Dope is a Usenet Dip Shit.
> 

Always Wrong seems very upset about recent developments...

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6maua$1r5$2@dont-
email.me:

> A Google search sometimes finds USENET posts. 

  You really are an idiot...   you know...   always wrong.

  Google IS a Usenet service provider, dumbass.  They have some of the 
biggest severs in the network.  HUGE banks of hard drives in racks.

  It is called Google Groups, and sed is one of them, but so are 40,000 
others.

  John Dope showing us that the moniker he always uses on me, fits him 
far batter.

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6maua$1r5$2@dont-
email.me:

> I and maybe others have tried. One forum was receptive, another forum
> wasn't (with an illogical justification). 

Go to reddit, you fucking retard.

  Top rated, high technology, even post suspension penalties and bans 
by group founders if they don't like you or your mouth.

  Even there, however, it is individual filter based.  The onus is on 
you to filter those you wish to not see.

  Group founders and reddit managers, however can shitcan your ass in 
various ways and for various reasons, including an asshole complaining 
instead of using his or her or it's filter.

 John Dope is a Usenet Dip Shit.

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6ma5g$1r5$1@dont-
email.me:

> When in Rome...
> 
> 
> whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:16:35 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>>> Bill "Bozo" Sloman is a textbook cannibal leftist... 
>> 
>> 
>> ... this, in a thread about a kinder, gentler internet?
>> 
>> I detect hypocrisy.
>> 
> 
> 

  Something a top posting, hypocritical Trump cult idiot would say.

Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote: 

> He made some good points 

It's called "feigning". 

> and you have no answer to them, 

Actually I do, and have. 

> I see why you want this fantasy, but desire can't make the impossible
> practical. 

All it would require is sharing logged-in users' block requests. Highly
unlikely, but anything is possible. 

> Usenet just doesn't swing that way.  Pick a closed infrastructure like
> parler or something. 

I and maybe others have tried. One forum was receptive, another forum
wasn't (with an illogical justification). Don't know whether it was
implemented, haven't been back to that forum, doubt it. 

I was simply providing an example of how it would FUNCTION. Since USENET
posts are propagated around the Internet, group members are not the only
people who see these posts. A Google search sometimes finds USENET posts. 

It might be wishful thinking. Anyone in control is unlikely to give up their 
power of censorship. But you never know.

When in Rome...


whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:16:35 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>> Bill "Bozo" Sloman is a textbook cannibal leftist... 
> 
> 
> ... this, in a thread about a kinder, gentler internet?
> 
> I detect hypocrisy.
> 

On 2022-05-24, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
> No point in discussing anything with Bill "Bozo" Sloman,

He made some good points and you have no answer to them, I see why
you want this fantasy, but desire can't make the impossible practical.
Usenet just doesn't swing that way.  Pick a closed infrastructure
like parler or something.

-- 
  Jasen.

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:16:35 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> Bill "Bozo" Sloman is a textbook cannibal leftist... 


... this, in a thread about a kinder, gentler internet?

I detect hypocrisy.