> On 1/8/2022 3:23 AM, boB wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 04:13:06 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm curious
>>> if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control system
>>> loop analysis a la:
>>>
>>> <https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
>>> source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
>>> stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
>>> s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically but
>>> nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink and do
>>> a better job of it anyway
>>>
>>> Here's the specs for 3561A:
>>>
>>> <https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
>>>
>>
>>
>> These were awesome instruments in their time !
>>
>> I would love to have one just for nastalgic reasons cuz we used to use
>> these in the 80s.
>>
>> boB
>>
>>
>>
>
> Mainly looking for a tool for profiling e.g. power inductors and audio
> transformers, plus some control loop analysis. I'm not sure the 3561 is
> the best tool perhaps, the lack of swept-sine and other signal injection
> types is kind of a bummer.
>
> The 3562 and 3563 seem like more appropriate tools for that job. There's
> a spot down the road from me that carries a lot of this stuff surplus
> and not paying shipping would be great, I'm planning on picking up a
> 3478A and a power supply or two there shortly:
>
> <https://www.bmisurplus.com/product/hewlett-packard-hp-3478a-digital-multimeter/>
Getting these calibrated to a high standard is pretty cheap, like 50
bucks per unit.
Reply by bitrex●January 8, 20222022-01-08
On 1/8/2022 3:23 AM, boB wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 04:13:06 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
>> It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm curious
>> if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control system
>> loop analysis a la:
>>
>> <https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>>
>> Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
>> source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
>> stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
>> s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically but
>> nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink and do
>> a better job of it anyway
>>
>> Here's the specs for 3561A:
>>
>> <https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
>
>
> These were awesome instruments in their time !
>
> I would love to have one just for nastalgic reasons cuz we used to use
> these in the 80s.
>
> boB
>
>
>
Mainly looking for a tool for profiling e.g. power inductors and audio
transformers, plus some control loop analysis. I'm not sure the 3561 is
the best tool perhaps, the lack of swept-sine and other signal injection
types is kind of a bummer.
The 3562 and 3563 seem like more appropriate tools for that job. There's
a spot down the road from me that carries a lot of this stuff surplus
and not paying shipping would be great, I'm planning on picking up a
3478A and a power supply or two there shortly:
<https://www.bmisurplus.com/product/hewlett-packard-hp-3478a-digital-multimeter/>
I'll ask if they ever get some of those two in stock, a G seems a fair
price for one in as-is working condition.
There was a 3561A on eBay for $200 plus shipping recently but someone
grabbed it first. It was functional but throwing a level 1 error code
and I looked it up, like "DMA writeback time violation" or somesuch.
That doesn't sound necessarily trivial, a bad memory board or IC to hunt
down perhaps. Don't really want to fuss with it...
Reply by boB●January 8, 20222022-01-08
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 04:13:06 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm curious
>if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control system
>loop analysis a la:
>
><https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>
>Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
>source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
>stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
>s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically but
>nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink and do
>a better job of it anyway
>
>Here's the specs for 3561A:
>
><https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
These were awesome instruments in their time !
I would love to have one just for nastalgic reasons cuz we used to use
these in the 80s.
boB
Reply by bitrex●January 7, 20222022-01-07
On 1/7/2022 12:57 PM, bitrex wrote:
> On 1/7/2022 10:52 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> bitrex wrote:
>>> It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm
>>> curious if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency
>>> control system loop analysis a la:
>>>
>>> <https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
>>> source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
>>> stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
>>> s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically
>>> but nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink
>>> and do a better job of it anyway
>>>
>>> Here's the specs for 3561A:
>>>
>>> <https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
>>>
>>
>> Haven't used one of those since about 1988. The two-channel ones are
>> much better. I used to have a 3562A, which I liked a lot, and a 36660
>> that I didn't like as well because it used one digitizer for both
>> channels, so that it only went up to 50 kHz in two-channel mode.
>>
>> I now have a 35665A, which I paid $300 for. It has the same problem
>> but has extra functionality. BTW there used to be an outfit called
>> GLK Instruments that would sell you a customized ROM that turned on
>> all the options. (I have one--it was $50 IIRC.)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>
>
> Thanks, I have a USB/PC-based VNA that works well enough for the small
> amount of RF stuff I do. But for low-frequency analyzers the options
> seem more limited. The 3577A seems like the most general-purpose tool
> but a certified refurb runs about 2k and then probably another 2k for
> the S parameter test set which seems nice to have but I don't know how
> often I'd use it...I may just keep my eye out for a working 3562 for
> around 1k that doesn't seem unreasonable for what you get.
>
> My short list for lab upgrade this year is a low-frequency analyzer and
> a nice bench LCR meter/component analyzer but I tend to get deep in a
> hole looking at the options, I don't really want to spend even $300 on
> this kind of Shenzen-special stuff:
>
> <https://www.amazon.com/East-Tester-Capacitance-Resistance-100hz-10KHZ/dp/B08FR2GB92/>
>
>
> But then pretty quickly you're pushing several grand or more for units
> from BK, etc.
There's also the HP 3563A "Control System Analyzer" which seems like a
pretty useful piece for LF gain/phase also. HP stuff from this era is
weird it seems like there's a lot of cross-over and you could turn some
tools into any other tool just through options and ROM packages...
Reply by bitrex●January 7, 20222022-01-07
On 1/7/2022 10:52 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> bitrex wrote:
>> It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm
>> curious if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control
>> system loop analysis a la:
>>
>> <https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>>
>> Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
>> source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
>> stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
>> s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically
>> but nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink
>> and do a better job of it anyway
>>
>> Here's the specs for 3561A:
>>
>> <https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
>>
>
> Haven't used one of those since about 1988. The two-channel ones are
> much better. I used to have a 3562A, which I liked a lot, and a 36660
> that I didn't like as well because it used one digitizer for both
> channels, so that it only went up to 50 kHz in two-channel mode.
>
> I now have a 35665A, which I paid $300 for. It has the same problem but
> has extra functionality. BTW there used to be an outfit called GLK
> Instruments that would sell you a customized ROM that turned on all the
> options. (I have one--it was $50 IIRC.)
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
Thanks, I have a USB/PC-based VNA that works well enough for the small
amount of RF stuff I do. But for low-frequency analyzers the options
seem more limited. The 3577A seems like the most general-purpose tool
but a certified refurb runs about 2k and then probably another 2k for
the S parameter test set which seems nice to have but I don't know how
often I'd use it...I may just keep my eye out for a working 3562 for
around 1k that doesn't seem unreasonable for what you get.
My short list for lab upgrade this year is a low-frequency analyzer and
a nice bench LCR meter/component analyzer but I tend to get deep in a
hole looking at the options, I don't really want to spend even $300 on
this kind of Shenzen-special stuff:
<https://www.amazon.com/East-Tester-Capacitance-Resistance-100hz-10KHZ/dp/B08FR2GB92/>
But then pretty quickly you're pushing several grand or more for units
from BK, etc.
Reply by Phil Hobbs●January 7, 20222022-01-07
bitrex wrote:
> It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm curious
> if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control system
> loop analysis a la:
>
> <https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
>
> Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
> source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
> stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
> s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically but
> nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink and do
> a better job of it anyway
>
> Here's the specs for 3561A:
>
> <https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>
>
Haven't used one of those since about 1988. The two-channel ones are
much better. I used to have a 3562A, which I liked a lot, and a 36660
that I didn't like as well because it used one digitizer for both
channels, so that it only went up to 50 kHz in two-channel mode.
I now have a 35665A, which I paid $300 for. It has the same problem but
has extra functionality. BTW there used to be an outfit called GLK
Instruments that would sell you a customized ROM that turned on all the
options. (I have one--it was $50 IIRC.)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttp://hobbs-eo.com
Reply by bitrex●January 7, 20222022-01-07
It's a cheap and cheerful (relatively compact) boat anchor, I'm curious
if it could be good for doing any useful low-frequency control system
loop analysis a la:
<https://www.hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_243-6.pdf>
Unfortunately it only seems to include some kind of shaped noise as a
source for gain/phase measurement but might still be useful for some
stuff.. The beefier 3562 included a curve fitting algorithm to fit an
s-domain transfer function to the gain/phase response automatically but
nowadays I think you could just dump the data to Matlab/Simulink and do
a better job of it anyway
Here's the specs for 3561A:
<https://82fai3h5wg8220a0l3ilfiz1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads//2015/09/HP3561A.pdf>