Reply by Rick C December 25, 20212021-12-25
On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 6:30:08 PM UTC-5, Don Y wrote:
> > [NORAD keeps 30 days supply of "everything" -- including fuel, potable > water, etc. -- on hand in case they have to seal up the mountain. > What if they need to stay sealed for *31* days???]
That's easy. On day 30 they cut rations in half. Every day after that they also cut rations in half. That way they never run out. See? Simple! -- Rick C. - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by Don Y December 25, 20212021-12-25
On 12/25/2021 12:28 PM, Joerg wrote:
> On 12/23/21 8:36 AM, Don Y wrote: >> On 12/22/2021 11:32 AM, Joerg wrote: >>>>>>>> [UPSs are inexpensive -- $5] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They cost a little more, starting at $50 for a small one. Provided you >>>>>>> want a new one and not a castaway with a shot battery that will cost >>>>>>> almost as much to replace as a new UPS. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's likely true for the small/cheap "modified sine wave" >>>>>> inverters. Once you step up to true sine wave and higher >>>>>> power levels, the cost of the batteries becomes a smaller >>>>>> portion of the total cost. Thus, giving value to "surplus" >>>>>> units (as ANY unit will need new batteries, eventually). >>>>> >>>>> I have no need for such a fancy and expensive inverter. Except in the >>>>> generator, where true-sine was included. >>>> >>>> Stepped sine-wave and pure sine-wave cost the same as surplus. >>>> You're paying for weight, not "technology". >>> >>> They definitely do not cost the same when new. Case in point, I bought this >>> for $55 plus tax, free shipping, before Bidenflation: >>> >>> https://www.walmart.com/ip/CyberPower-Standby-ST625U-625VA-8-Port-Compact-UPS-120V-AC/383808966 >> >> I bought *two* of these and two of the expansion battery boxes (below) for >> a total of $7 at an auction. $7 is the minimum bid (i.e., no one else >> WANTED them!) >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA2200RMXL2U-2200VA-Smart-UPS/dp/B003MA3W4G> >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA48RMXLBP2U-UPS-Battery/dp/B001BBMXFC> >> >> They were still in their original shipping boxes. All of the batteries >> still showing charge. Someone simply decided they "didn't want them" >> after having made the purchase and accepted delivery. >> >> This is fairly common at large companies where it's not the decision makers' >> money that's involved. >> >> I like that form factor as they make good use of space beneath my >> workstations -- tall and slender. Most of mine are smaller (less VA): >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-1500VA-Smart-UPS-Uninterruptible-SRT1500XLA/dp/B07214X49M> > > I was never lucky to find any UPS like that. On Ebay they quickly get bid up to > levels that are beyond what their remaining value is. So I just bought a new > one, for less that those EBay bids, and no faffing around with batteries and > stuff.
eBay is the wrong place to look for HEAVY things like UPSs. Even if "free", the shipping charges would kill you. Every "modest" size town/city has an abundance of businesses that dispose of their surplus kit -- often through auctions or other "recyclers" (who "take it off their hands"). These came from a local hospital's IT department. Others have come from city gummit offices, school districts, electronic device manufacturers, etc.
> Unpack, plug in, turn on, test, move on with life. That's my favorite UPS > implementation method.
As mine. Except having to dispose of the 4 very large, oversized boxes that they come packed in.
>> The issue with these is making sure the *feet* are available in >> the auction lot before bidding. > > Feet? That would be the least of my worries. Four chunks of Delrin do the > trick, or rubber for smaller units.
This form factor is intended to be rack mounted -- 2U. So, could be "laid flat". That, however, eats up lots of (floor) space -- something that is at a premium, here. I could lay them atop my disk shelfs (4U each) but that means moving the shelfs would require lifting the UPS off the top. They can, alternatively, be stood on end (my preferred orientation) where they just require a "sliver" of (tall) space. Feet keep them from easily being toppled. But, the feet are a sort of saddle onto which the UPS sits. So, lift the UPS and the feet will stay behind. This is a risk when the UPS is discarded and the feet get separated from the UPS. One could make some out of 1/2" plywood with blocks of 2x4 on each side -- but, that's tacky looking.
>> Most UPSs that I've rescued were three years old. Likely the batteries >> started to fail, the IT guy got a price for replacements FROM THE UPS >> VENDOR and the bean counters said "just toss the thing" -- rather than >> processing the paperwork for the reorder, handling the delivery, >> installing the replacements and disposing of the spent batteries >> (i.e., beyond the inflated purchase price, there are high internal >> costs to actually making the replacement) >> >> The economies are different for smaller firms. E.g., I'll save the >> bad batteries until I have enough of them to justify a trip to the >> recycler (about 20c/pound). > > Sure, but you have to have the connections to get first dibs.
No. Read again: NO ONE WANTED THEM. Think about it... many people don't use a UPS. Those that do, likely have *small* units (in terms of capacity and size). If the batteries had been depleted/old, there is ~$20 of recycle value in the batteries alone. So, a $7 bid nets $13 profit. But, buying them for that reason is a waste of your time. Instead, buy with the intent of using them and recycle the batteries when convenient. [The battery recycler is on the drive to one of the auction sites so I load up the car with dead batteries before the next auction] These tend to see more use in datacenters. Folks buying for datacenters tend to have budgets to BUY NEW -- they're not "competing" with you for this "surplus" stuff. Discarded servers similarly have "no market" as they are too big/noisey for (typical) home use. And, the folks who would otherwise be expected to want them can afford to "buy new". My workstations are beasts -- 18" deep, 21" tall and 8" wide. They weigh in at a bit over 60 pounds. Folks want *small* computers -- or laptops. They have no need for 3 accessible drive bays, 4 internal spindles, dual NICs and 1100W power supplies! And, their "recycled value" is lower because they are harder to disassemble into their component parts than some cheap little Dell SFF machine or minitower. They are, essentially, trash (dual, 6 core Xeons at 3.2GHz with 144GB of RAM) OTOH, an i7 laptop will command a few bucks! Because people *want* them!
>>> Buying a surplus one on Ebay or somewhere requires a new set of batteries >>> ($$$) plus chances are some electrolytic in there are well past prime. >> >> You wouldn't want to pay for shipping. And, if a UPS can't be >> operable after 3 years, then why would you purchase ANY one? > > The ones on EBay auctions were a lot older than 3 years.
Look at the local firms in your area. All of my colleagues were similarly ignorant of what was available in their back yards. Now, they all make a point of visiting recyclers, auctions, etc. And, it's a pleasant distraction. Like going to an old-fashioned (not new-fangled) hardware store and looking through tools and fasteners with an eye towards how they were intended to be used. [I bought my second "Personal Reader" -- with page scanner -- at another auction. No one knew what it was (and would likely not want it even if they did!) so it was another $7 "no bid" purchase] <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zNxsYLuGqw> page scanner, here: <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/Kurzweil_scanner_01.jpg/440px-Kurzweil_scanner_01.jpg>
>>>> Batteries for one cost no more than for the other. So, silly to >>>> settle for stepped output when you can have sine-wave for free. >>> >>> Nothing silly about that when buying a new one. Why should one spend more >>> money where mod-sine clearly suffices? >> >> You're making the assumption that it "suffices". > > No, I _know_ it suffices for me. As in "I tested it".
That was my point. My UPS needs just keep increasing. I have a 1500VA unit dedicated to power the monitors in my office.
>> Each of my UPSs has a network interface so I can (programatically) monitor >> load and log that (without writing any code) to another 24/7/365 box. >> That feature isn't available on low-end units. > > And I don't need it.
You're a typical consumer. I imagine I have far more kit than you and have it all networked (there are 48 drops *in* my office, alone)
>>>> We can watch TV, listen to the radio, etc. for similar amounts of >>>> time. Put a 13W LED/CFL bulb in a lamp and light a room for 5-6 hours! >>> >>> I can do that with a car battery. But no need because the drill here is >>> simple, power goes, start generator, and the UPS only has to tide things >>> over for those 15mins or so. Plus reserves for when the batteries begin to age. >> >> We skip the *need* for the genset as we have enough UPS capacity to >> "carry" the convenience loads. And, can likely live without the >> bigger loads (furnace, frig, freezer, microwave, etc.) for the >> short time that we'll be without power. >> >> We've had outages in the wee hours of the morning. The repair crew was >> outside promptly, isolating the defective cable segment and rerouting >> power from the "other end". SWMBO would wonder why her bedside clock >> was flashing 12:00 when she awoke: "Did we have a power failure last night?" > > What, you did not equip her with a clock that has battery backup?
She could use the network media server -- which would give her a backed up display *and* audio content (fall asleep to music, wake to music/radio, etc.). But, she is "attached" to her little stereo. I keep threatening NOT to repair it -- again -- but always seem to get coerced into fixing the CD changer "one more time". I've even programmed the media server to respond to the remote from that mini stereo so it can *virtually* emulate the CD changer. But, she's more comfortable with what she's known for ~35 years... (she has a *second* one in her art studio that I similarly have to maintain)
>> The actual faulted cable might not be replaced for months (which leaves >> us vulnerable to a second fault). But, that's a bean-counter exercise >> in cost vs. expectations. (They just replaced another segment down >> the block a few weeks ago) > > Here it's PG&E so the grid is iffy in general. Ours is below ground but that > doesn't help because much of the town's isn't. Unfortunately the transfer > station is across that part of town, so ...
The distribution transformer for this neighborhood is nearby (surrounded by shrubbery). The infrastructure is ~40 years old (my understanding is that it was designed to be serviced in 30). Each of the utilities (with the notable exception of PSTN) have been lagging in their maintenance (PSTN has been almost negligent) but we are now probably starting fresh (all of the gas lines were recently replaced and upgraded in capacity; the electric service incrementally replaced, water meters replaced, etc.) Other/older parts of town are more problematic as their utilities are overhead. So, auto accidents and other potential hazzards (high winds, etc.) leave them at risk. If you drive through most metropolitan/suburban areas, it's obvious that most infrastructure is vulnerable to "extraordinary events". Thoughout town, one will find gas and water services coming up out of the ground for a check valve or access port, then diving back below grade. Is it LUCK that keeps them from being struck by errant drivers? Our (local) well/pumping station is within 100 ft of a wash that was catastrophically eroded in flooding 30 years back. What's to stop the next event from taking *that* piece of land? <shrug> <shrug> EXPECT *typical* outages. BE PREPARED for the exceptional ones. But, acknowledge that you can't cover ALL bases! [NORAD keeps 30 days supply of "everything" -- including fuel, potable water, etc. -- on hand in case they have to seal up the mountain. What if they need to stay sealed for *31* days???]
Reply by Joerg December 25, 20212021-12-25
On 12/25/21 2:00 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Joerg wrote: >> On 12/23/21 8:36 AM, Don Y wrote: >>> On 12/22/2021 11:32 AM, Joerg wrote: >>>>>>>>> [UPSs are inexpensive -- $5] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They cost a little more, starting at $50 for a small one. >>>>>>>> Provided you want a new one and not a castaway with a shot >>>>>>>> battery that will cost almost as much to replace as a new UPS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's likely true for the small/cheap "modified sine wave" >>>>>>> inverters.&nbsp; Once you step up to true sine wave and higher >>>>>>> power levels, the cost of the batteries becomes a smaller >>>>>>> portion of the total cost.&nbsp; Thus, giving value to "surplus" >>>>>>> units (as ANY unit will need new batteries, eventually). >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no need for such a fancy and expensive inverter. Except in >>>>>> the generator, where true-sine was included. >>>>> >>>>> Stepped sine-wave and pure sine-wave cost the same as surplus. >>>>> You're paying for weight, not "technology". >>>> >>>> They definitely do not cost the same when new. Case in point, I >>>> bought this for $55 plus tax, free shipping, before Bidenflation: >>>> >>>> https://www.walmart.com/ip/CyberPower-Standby-ST625U-625VA-8-Port-Compact-UPS-120V-AC/383808966 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I bought *two* of these and two of the expansion battery boxes >>> (below) for >>> a total of $7 at an auction.&nbsp; $7 is the minimum bid (i.e., no one else >>> WANTED them!) >>> >>> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA2200RMXL2U-2200VA-Smart-UPS/dp/B003MA3W4G> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA48RMXLBP2U-UPS-Battery/dp/B001BBMXFC> >>> >>> They were still in their original shipping boxes.&nbsp; All of the batteries >>> still showing charge.&nbsp; Someone simply decided they "didn't want them" >>> after having made the purchase and accepted delivery. >>> >>> This is fairly common at large companies where it's not the decision >>> makers' >>> money that's involved. >>> >>> I like that form factor as they make good use of space beneath my >>> workstations -- tall and slender.&nbsp; Most of mine are smaller (less VA): >>> >>> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-1500VA-Smart-UPS-Uninterruptible-SRT1500XLA/dp/B07214X49M> >>> >>> >> >> I was never lucky to find any UPS like that. On Ebay they quickly get >> bid up to levels that are beyond what their remaining value is. So I >> just bought a new one, for less that those EBay bids, and no faffing >> around with batteries and stuff. >> >> Unpack, plug in, turn on, test, move on with life. That's my favorite >> UPS implementation method. > > The IBM ThinkCenter ones are rebadged SmartUPSes that go for much > cheaper than the APC-branded ones. >
I haven't seen any on EBay. In the end I just bought a new one from CyberPower. Works. Well, except it doesn't like transformer loads which is a bummer but not a problem in my case. When the battery gives out some day I might try to lower the charge-end voltage and then use a LiFePO4 battery. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply by Phil Hobbs December 25, 20212021-12-25
Joerg wrote:
> On 12/23/21 8:36 AM, Don Y wrote: >> On 12/22/2021 11:32 AM, Joerg wrote: >>>>>>>> [UPSs are inexpensive -- $5] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They cost a little more, starting at $50 for a small one. >>>>>>> Provided you want a new one and not a castaway with a shot >>>>>>> battery that will cost almost as much to replace as a new UPS. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's likely true for the small/cheap "modified sine wave" >>>>>> inverters.&nbsp; Once you step up to true sine wave and higher >>>>>> power levels, the cost of the batteries becomes a smaller >>>>>> portion of the total cost.&nbsp; Thus, giving value to "surplus" >>>>>> units (as ANY unit will need new batteries, eventually). >>>>> >>>>> I have no need for such a fancy and expensive inverter. Except in >>>>> the generator, where true-sine was included. >>>> >>>> Stepped sine-wave and pure sine-wave cost the same as surplus. >>>> You're paying for weight, not "technology". >>> >>> They definitely do not cost the same when new. Case in point, I >>> bought this for $55 plus tax, free shipping, before Bidenflation: >>> >>> https://www.walmart.com/ip/CyberPower-Standby-ST625U-625VA-8-Port-Compact-UPS-120V-AC/383808966 >> >> >> >> I bought *two* of these and two of the expansion battery boxes (below) >> for >> a total of $7 at an auction.&nbsp; $7 is the minimum bid (i.e., no one else >> WANTED them!) >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA2200RMXL2U-2200VA-Smart-UPS/dp/B003MA3W4G> >> >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA48RMXLBP2U-UPS-Battery/dp/B001BBMXFC> >> >> They were still in their original shipping boxes.&nbsp; All of the batteries >> still showing charge.&nbsp; Someone simply decided they "didn't want them" >> after having made the purchase and accepted delivery. >> >> This is fairly common at large companies where it's not the decision >> makers' >> money that's involved. >> >> I like that form factor as they make good use of space beneath my >> workstations -- tall and slender.&nbsp; Most of mine are smaller (less VA): >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-1500VA-Smart-UPS-Uninterruptible-SRT1500XLA/dp/B07214X49M> >> >> > > I was never lucky to find any UPS like that. On Ebay they quickly get > bid up to levels that are beyond what their remaining value is. So I > just bought a new one, for less that those EBay bids, and no faffing > around with batteries and stuff. > > Unpack, plug in, turn on, test, move on with life. That's my favorite > UPS implementation method.
The IBM ThinkCenter ones are rebadged SmartUPSes that go for much cheaper than the APC-branded ones. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
Reply by Joerg December 25, 20212021-12-25
On 12/23/21 8:36 AM, Don Y wrote:
> On 12/22/2021 11:32 AM, Joerg wrote: >>>>>>> [UPSs are inexpensive -- $5] >>>>>> >>>>>> They cost a little more, starting at $50 for a small one. Provided >>>>>> you want a new one and not a castaway with a shot battery that >>>>>> will cost almost as much to replace as a new UPS. >>>>> >>>>> That's likely true for the small/cheap "modified sine wave" >>>>> inverters.&nbsp; Once you step up to true sine wave and higher >>>>> power levels, the cost of the batteries becomes a smaller >>>>> portion of the total cost.&nbsp; Thus, giving value to "surplus" >>>>> units (as ANY unit will need new batteries, eventually). >>>> >>>> I have no need for such a fancy and expensive inverter. Except in >>>> the generator, where true-sine was included. >>> >>> Stepped sine-wave and pure sine-wave cost the same as surplus. >>> You're paying for weight, not "technology". >> >> They definitely do not cost the same when new. Case in point, I bought >> this for $55 plus tax, free shipping, before Bidenflation: >> >> https://www.walmart.com/ip/CyberPower-Standby-ST625U-625VA-8-Port-Compact-UPS-120V-AC/383808966 > > > I bought *two* of these and two of the expansion battery boxes (below) for > a total of $7 at an auction.&nbsp; $7 is the minimum bid (i.e., no one else > WANTED them!) > > <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA2200RMXL2U-2200VA-Smart-UPS/dp/B003MA3W4G> > > <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA48RMXLBP2U-UPS-Battery/dp/B001BBMXFC> > > They were still in their original shipping boxes.&nbsp; All of the batteries > still showing charge.&nbsp; Someone simply decided they "didn't want them" > after having made the purchase and accepted delivery. > > This is fairly common at large companies where it's not the decision > makers' > money that's involved. > > I like that form factor as they make good use of space beneath my > workstations -- tall and slender.&nbsp; Most of mine are smaller (less VA): > > <https://www.amazon.com/APC-1500VA-Smart-UPS-Uninterruptible-SRT1500XLA/dp/B07214X49M> > >
I was never lucky to find any UPS like that. On Ebay they quickly get bid up to levels that are beyond what their remaining value is. So I just bought a new one, for less that those EBay bids, and no faffing around with batteries and stuff. Unpack, plug in, turn on, test, move on with life. That's my favorite UPS implementation method.
> The issue with these is making sure the *feet* are available in > the auction lot before bidding. >
Feet? That would be the least of my worries. Four chunks of Delrin do the trick, or rubber for smaller units.
> Most UPSs that I've rescued were three years old.&nbsp; Likely the batteries > started to fail, the IT guy got a price for replacements FROM THE UPS > VENDOR and the bean counters said "just toss the thing" -- rather than > processing the paperwork for the reorder, handling the delivery, > installing the replacements and disposing of the spent batteries > (i.e., beyond the inflated purchase price, there are high internal > costs to actually making the replacement) > > The economies are different for smaller firms.&nbsp; E.g., I'll save the > bad batteries until I have enough of them to justify a trip to the > recycler (about 20c/pound). >
Sure, but you have to have the connections to get first dibs.
>> Buying a surplus one on Ebay or somewhere requires a new set of >> batteries ($$$) plus chances are some electrolytic in there are well >> past prime. > > You wouldn't want to pay for shipping.&nbsp; And, if a UPS can't be > operable after 3 years, then why would you purchase ANY one? >
The ones on EBay auctions were a lot older than 3 years.
>>> Batteries for one cost no more than for the other.&nbsp; So, silly to >>> settle for stepped output when you can have sine-wave for free. >> >> Nothing silly about that when buying a new one. Why should one spend >> more money where mod-sine clearly suffices? > > You're making the assumption that it "suffices".
No, I _know_ it suffices for me. As in "I tested it".
> ... Clearly there is a > need/market for sine-wave output devices, you just don't happen to be > part of that market. >
Exactly. The loads I need to tide over until the generator is running are happy with modified sine.
> Each of my UPSs has a network interface so I can (programatically) monitor > load and log that (without writing any code) to another 24/7/365 box. > That feature isn't available on low-end units. >
And I don't need it.
>>> The 1500VA UPS on this PC -- plus the microwave link to the ISP -- will >>> keep the "connection" up for just over 3 hours.&nbsp; As the load is >>> relatively tiny, I could replace it with a little 250VA unit.&nbsp; And, >>> likely live with less than an hour of up-time. >>> >> >> My ISP's service goes down the millisecond power goes down and they >> have a de facto monopoly here. So no point in investing in a huge UPS. >> The modem they lease me has a battery backup option. I inquired when >> the installer was here and he said "What for?". > > My ISP is in a different part of town.&nbsp; I have no idea when he experiences > power outages.&nbsp; But, we have rarely been without a connection (and there's > no real "idle" time when an outage wouldn't be visible to *one* of us). >
Ours is a huge company, Comcast. Only game left in town. They know it so the prices are accordingly, and no outage backup :-(
>>> We can watch TV, listen to the radio, etc. for similar amounts of >>> time.&nbsp; Put a 13W LED/CFL bulb in a lamp and light a room for 5-6 hours! >> >> I can do that with a car battery. But no need because the drill here >> is simple, power goes, start generator, and the UPS only has to tide >> things over for those 15mins or so. Plus reserves for when the >> batteries begin to age. > > We skip the *need* for the genset as we have enough UPS capacity to > "carry" the convenience loads.&nbsp; And, can likely live without the > bigger loads (furnace, frig, freezer, microwave, etc.) for the > short time that we'll be without power. > > We've had outages in the wee hours of the morning.&nbsp; The repair crew was > outside promptly, isolating the defective cable segment and rerouting > power from the "other end".&nbsp; SWMBO would wonder why her bedside clock > was flashing 12:00 when she awoke:&nbsp; "Did we have a power failure last > night?" >
What, you did not equip her with a clock that has battery backup?
> The actual faulted cable might not be replaced for months (which leaves > us vulnerable to a second fault).&nbsp; But, that's a bean-counter exercise > in cost vs. expectations.&nbsp; (They just replaced another segment down > the block a few weeks ago) >
Here it's PG&E so the grid is iffy in general. Ours is below ground but that doesn't help because much of the town's isn't. Unfortunately the transfer station is across that part of town, so ... -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply by Don Y December 23, 20212021-12-23
On 12/22/2021 11:32 AM, Joerg wrote:
>>>>>> [UPSs are inexpensive -- $5] >>>>> >>>>> They cost a little more, starting at $50 for a small one. Provided you >>>>> want a new one and not a castaway with a shot battery that will cost >>>>> almost as much to replace as a new UPS. >>>> >>>> That's likely true for the small/cheap "modified sine wave" >>>> inverters. Once you step up to true sine wave and higher >>>> power levels, the cost of the batteries becomes a smaller >>>> portion of the total cost. Thus, giving value to "surplus" >>>> units (as ANY unit will need new batteries, eventually). >>> >>> I have no need for such a fancy and expensive inverter. Except in the >>> generator, where true-sine was included. >> >> Stepped sine-wave and pure sine-wave cost the same as surplus. >> You're paying for weight, not "technology". > > They definitely do not cost the same when new. Case in point, I bought this for > $55 plus tax, free shipping, before Bidenflation: > > https://www.walmart.com/ip/CyberPower-Standby-ST625U-625VA-8-Port-Compact-UPS-120V-AC/383808966
I bought *two* of these and two of the expansion battery boxes (below) for a total of $7 at an auction. $7 is the minimum bid (i.e., no one else WANTED them!) <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA2200RMXL2U-2200VA-Smart-UPS/dp/B003MA3W4G> <https://www.amazon.com/APC-SURTA48RMXLBP2U-UPS-Battery/dp/B001BBMXFC> They were still in their original shipping boxes. All of the batteries still showing charge. Someone simply decided they "didn't want them" after having made the purchase and accepted delivery. This is fairly common at large companies where it's not the decision makers' money that's involved. I like that form factor as they make good use of space beneath my workstations -- tall and slender. Most of mine are smaller (less VA): <https://www.amazon.com/APC-1500VA-Smart-UPS-Uninterruptible-SRT1500XLA/dp/B07214X49M> The issue with these is making sure the *feet* are available in the auction lot before bidding. Most UPSs that I've rescued were three years old. Likely the batteries started to fail, the IT guy got a price for replacements FROM THE UPS VENDOR and the bean counters said "just toss the thing" -- rather than processing the paperwork for the reorder, handling the delivery, installing the replacements and disposing of the spent batteries (i.e., beyond the inflated purchase price, there are high internal costs to actually making the replacement) The economies are different for smaller firms. E.g., I'll save the bad batteries until I have enough of them to justify a trip to the recycler (about 20c/pound).
> Buying a surplus one on Ebay or somewhere requires a new set of batteries ($$$) > plus chances are some electrolytic in there are well past prime.
You wouldn't want to pay for shipping. And, if a UPS can't be operable after 3 years, then why would you purchase ANY one?
>> Batteries for one cost no more than for the other. So, silly to >> settle for stepped output when you can have sine-wave for free. > > Nothing silly about that when buying a new one. Why should one spend more money > where mod-sine clearly suffices?
You're making the assumption that it "suffices". Clearly there is a need/market for sine-wave output devices, you just don't happen to be part of that market. Each of my UPSs has a network interface so I can (programatically) monitor load and log that (without writing any code) to another 24/7/365 box. That feature isn't available on low-end units.
>> The 1500VA UPS on this PC -- plus the microwave link to the ISP -- will >> keep the "connection" up for just over 3 hours. As the load is >> relatively tiny, I could replace it with a little 250VA unit. And, >> likely live with less than an hour of up-time. >> > > My ISP's service goes down the millisecond power goes down and they have a de > facto monopoly here. So no point in investing in a huge UPS. The modem they > lease me has a battery backup option. I inquired when the installer was here > and he said "What for?".
My ISP is in a different part of town. I have no idea when he experiences power outages. But, we have rarely been without a connection (and there's no real "idle" time when an outage wouldn't be visible to *one* of us).
>> We can watch TV, listen to the radio, etc. for similar amounts of >> time. Put a 13W LED/CFL bulb in a lamp and light a room for 5-6 hours! > > I can do that with a car battery. But no need because the drill here is simple, > power goes, start generator, and the UPS only has to tide things over for those > 15mins or so. Plus reserves for when the batteries begin to age.
We skip the *need* for the genset as we have enough UPS capacity to "carry" the convenience loads. And, can likely live without the bigger loads (furnace, frig, freezer, microwave, etc.) for the short time that we'll be without power. We've had outages in the wee hours of the morning. The repair crew was outside promptly, isolating the defective cable segment and rerouting power from the "other end". SWMBO would wonder why her bedside clock was flashing 12:00 when she awoke: "Did we have a power failure last night?" The actual faulted cable might not be replaced for months (which leaves us vulnerable to a second fault). But, that's a bean-counter exercise in cost vs. expectations. (They just replaced another segment down the block a few weeks ago)
Reply by Tom Gardner December 23, 20212021-12-23
On 23/12/21 14:20, David Brown wrote:
> I don't know that anyone in the UK considers the Magna Carta to be > anything other than what it is - a document signed by the king accepting > that he has limited powers and certain responsibilities towards the next > layer down in the feudal power system of the time.
Anyone? Rabid antivaxxers and covid deniers have stoked their echo chambers into the obvious antisocial beliefs and "noosworthy" actions. The courts give them short shrift.
Reply by David Brown December 23, 20212021-12-23
On 23/12/2021 13:42, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 10:04:26 PM UTC+11, David Brown > wrote: >> On 23/12/2021 02:25, Anthony William Sloman wrote: >>> On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 5:39:58 AM UTC+11, Joerg wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/19/21 2:25 PM, David Brown wrote: >>>>> On 18/12/2021 20:07, Joerg wrote: >>>>>> On 12/17/21 3:38 AM, David Brown wrote: >>>>>>> On 16/12/2021 21:59, Joerg wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/16/21 12:49 PM, David Brown wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> I am not an American, but I /do/ understand how that works. >>>>> And it really isn't that different from other representative >>>>> democracies except in the details. (In particular, >>>>> non-political positions in most countries are appointed based >>>>> on normal job qualifications. This means a sheriff or >>>>> attorney general is, at least in theory, given the job based >>>>> on qualifications and expected ability at the job, rather >>>>> than their ability to canvas votes, popularity with the >>>>> public, or their personal politics.) >>>>> >>>> It is a BIG difference. We elect sheriffs and attorneys >>>> general. That's how it should be. >>> >>> Americans do seem to think so. Nobody else seems to share that >>> idea. The US does seem to have the world's first written >>> constitution - it essentially formalised a lot of stuff that >>> other people were already doing, but included a certain amount of >>> innovation, so which worked out and got copied into other >>> people's written constitutions. Electing sherriffs and attorney >>> generals doesn't seem to have been a successful innovation, and >>> it doesn't seem to have been widely copied. >>> >> The USA does not have "the world's first written constitution". It >> has the oldest codified (that is, written in a single document) >> constitution that is still in force. That is a wildly different >> claim to fame. There have been written sets of fundamental law >> since Sumerian and Babylonian times. > > They aren't "constitutions". They were put together by the elite, and > prescribe how the rest of the population is expected to behave. >
The US constitution was also put together by the elites, determining how people should behave (and how they could vote to keep those same elites in power). Modern constitutions (counting the US constitution as modern) definitely contain far more about the rights of people and limitations of the powers of the elites - that was quite limited in early documents.
>> And perhaps the most significant step towards modern constitutions >> was the Magna Carta in 1215 in England. > > It was a deal between the feudal lords and the monarchy. > Constitutional lawyers found that they could interpret it in ways > that they liked. > > "Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 > charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch > and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the > charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all > of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and > 20th centuries. " >
As I said - it was a significant step towards modern constitutions.
>> Sweden had the first complete modern-style written constitution in >> the seventeenth century, but it has since been superseded. > > "The first Riksdag Act was developed in1617. It required that the > king consult the estates before declaring war or forming alliances. > In 1660 a protocol calling for the routine meeting of parliament was > adopted which gave parliament a more independent standing. In > 1720/3, constitutional reforms lead to a half century of > parliamentary domination of policy making, from 1719-1772, the > so-called Age of Freedom. It was during this time the first Freedom > of the Press Act was adopted (in 1766)." > > It was subsequently set aside when later kings decided that they > didn't want to pay attention to it, so looks more like negotiable > rules than any kind of fixed constitution. >
Perhaps you are imagining that a "constitution" is something fixed or long-lasting. Or maybe you are mixing it up with magic spells that remain in force despite major upheavals to country leaderships. The average lifespan of a constitution (according to Wikipedia) is 17 years. The US constitution is unusual in how long it has lasted, if you don't count the amendments.
>> Certainly the US constitution was a major achievement, and >> certainly it has been very influential for other later >> constitutions. (As you say, other countries copied some of the good >> bits - but not all parts would be appropriate to all countries.) >> >> But I think what stands out most about the US constitution is how >> many Americans view it. Many see it as a kind of holy or religious >> document, unfailing and perfect, and equally applicable now as it >> was 200+ years ago. > > We do see this here from time to time. American education does seem > to include a certain amount of brain-washing on the subject - in the > same sort of way that British secondary education misrepresents Magna > Carta. >
I don't know that anyone in the UK considers the Magna Carta to be anything other than what it is - a document signed by the king accepting that he has limited powers and certain responsibilities towards the next layer down in the feudal power system of the time. As an acceptance that the regent does not have absolute and unlimited power, it was a vital step towards a more democratic and law-based system of governance, but only the first step. Taking figures out of the air (in case anyone asks for references), 90% of Americans can tell you that their constitution is vital to their country and society, and that every American should swear allegiance to it - though they will be unable to tell you about anything in it, except perhaps that it gives you the right to carry a gun. 5% will know a lot about it, and 5% will know nothing at all. Corresponding figures in the UK will be 90% who have never heard of the Magna Carta, 5% who have heard of it as something they learned about at school but forgot, and 5% will know more. There is brain-washing about the US constitution in the USA - no doubts there. But no brain-washing about the Magna Carta in the UK. I have no idea where you pulled that idea from.
>> In most countries, the general populace neither knows nor cares >> about the details of their constitution - they are just the more >> fundamental laws of their country that require special handling in >> parliament to change (two thirds majority, and/or two independent >> parliamentary sessions). > > In Australia national referendums are required - and we have > compulsory voting ... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendums_in_Australia >
Reply by Anthony William Sloman December 23, 20212021-12-23
On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 10:04:26 PM UTC+11, David Brown wrote:
> On 23/12/2021 02:25, Anthony William Sloman wrote: > > On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 5:39:58 AM UTC+11, Joerg wrote: > >> On 12/19/21 2:25 PM, David Brown wrote: > >>> On 18/12/2021 20:07, Joerg wrote: > >>>> On 12/17/21 3:38 AM, David Brown wrote: > >>>>> On 16/12/2021 21:59, Joerg wrote: > >>>>>> On 12/16/21 12:49 PM, David Brown wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > >>> I am not an American, but I /do/ understand how that works. And > >>> it really isn't that different from other representative > >>> democracies except in the details. (In particular, non-political > >>> positions in most countries are appointed based on normal job > >>> qualifications. This means a sheriff or attorney general is, at > >>> least in theory, given the job based on qualifications and > >>> expected ability at the job, rather than their ability to canvas > >>> votes, popularity with the public, or their personal politics.) > >>> > >> It is a BIG difference. We elect sheriffs and attorneys general. > >> That's how it should be. > > > > Americans do seem to think so. Nobody else seems to share that idea. > > The US does seem to have the world's first written constitution - it > > essentially formalised a lot of stuff that other people were already > > doing, but included a certain amount of innovation, so which worked > > out and got copied into other people's written constitutions. > > Electing sherriffs and attorney generals doesn't seem to have been a > > successful innovation, and it doesn't seem to have been widely > > copied. > > > The USA does not have "the world's first written constitution". It has > the oldest codified (that is, written in a single document) constitution > that is still in force. That is a wildly different claim to fame. > There have been written sets of fundamental law since Sumerian and > Babylonian times.
They aren't "constitutions". They were put together by the elite, and prescribe how the rest of the population is expected to behave.
> And perhaps the most significant step towards modern constitutions was the Magna Carta in 1215 in England.
It was a deal between the feudal lords and the monarchy. Constitutional lawyers found that they could interpret it in ways that they liked. "Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. "
> Sweden had the first complete modern-style written constitution in the seventeenth century, but it has since been superseded.
"The first Riksdag Act was developed in1617. It required that the king consult the estates before declaring war or forming alliances. In 1660 a protocol calling for the routine meeting of parliament was adopted which gave parliament a more independent standing. In 1720/3, constitutional reforms lead to a half century of parliamentary domination of policy making, from 1719-1772, the so-called Age of Freedom. It was during this time the first Freedom of the Press Act was adopted (in 1766)." It was subsequently set aside when later kings decided that they didn't want to pay attention to it, so looks more like negotiable rules than any kind of fixed constitution.
> Certainly the US constitution was a major achievement, and certainly it > has been very influential for other later constitutions. (As you say, > other countries copied some of the good bits - but not all parts would > be appropriate to all countries.) > > But I think what stands out most about the US constitution is how many > Americans view it. Many see it as a kind of holy or religious document, > unfailing and perfect, and equally applicable now as it was 200+ years > ago.
We do see this here from time to time. American education does seem to include a certain amount of brain-washing on the subject - in the same sort of way that British secondary education misrepresents Magna Carta.
> In most countries, the general populace neither knows nor cares about the details of their constitution - they are just the more fundamental laws of their country that require special handling in parliament to change (two thirds majority, and/or two independent parliamentary sessions).
In Australia national referendums are required - and we have compulsory voting ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendums_in_Australia -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by David Brown December 23, 20212021-12-23
On 23/12/2021 02:25, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 5:39:58 AM UTC+11, Joerg wrote: >> On 12/19/21 2:25 PM, David Brown wrote: >>> On 18/12/2021 20:07, Joerg wrote: >>>> On 12/17/21 3:38 AM, David Brown wrote: >>>>> On 16/12/2021 21:59, Joerg wrote: >>>>>> On 12/16/21 12:49 PM, David Brown wrote: > > <snip> > >>> I am not an American, but I /do/ understand how that works. And >>> it really isn't that different from other representative >>> democracies except in the details. (In particular, non-political >>> positions in most countries are appointed based on normal job >>> qualifications. This means a sheriff or attorney general is, at >>> least in theory, given the job based on qualifications and >>> expected ability at the job, rather than their ability to canvas >>> votes, popularity with the public, or their personal politics.) >>> >> It is a BIG difference. We elect sheriffs and attorneys general. >> That's how it should be. > > Americans do seem to think so. Nobody else seems to share that idea. > The US does seem to have the world's first written constitution - it > essentially formalised a lot of stuff that other people were already > doing, but included a certain amount of innovation, so which worked > out and got copied into other people's written constitutions. > Electing sherriffs and attorney generals doesn't seem to have been a > successful innovation, and it doesn't seem to have been widely > copied. >
The USA does not have "the world's first written constitution". It has the oldest codified (that is, written in a single document) constitution that is still in force. That is a wildly different claim to fame. There have been written sets of fundamental law since Sumerian and Babylonian times. And perhaps the most significant step towards modern constitutions was the Magna Carta in 1215 in England. Sweden had the first complete modern-style written constitution in the seventeenth century, but it has since been superseded. Certainly the US constitution was a major achievement, and certainly it has been very influential for other later constitutions. (As you say, other countries copied some of the good bits - but not all parts would be appropriate to all countries.) But I think what stands out most about the US constitution is how many Americans view it. Many see it as a kind of holy or religious document, unfailing and perfect, and equally applicable now as it was 200+ years ago. In most countries, the general populace neither knows nor cares about the details of their constitution - they are just the more fundamental laws of their country that require special handling in parliament to change (two thirds majority, and/or two independent parliamentary sessions).