On 1/20/19 11:18 AM, bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 5:47:51 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> On 1/5/19 2:12 PM, 698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org wrote:
>>> John Larkin wrote
>>>> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
>>>> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
>>>> TC.
>>>>
>>>> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
>>>> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
>>>> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
>>>> coefficients.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
>>>> interesting architecture.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
>>>>
>>>> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
>>>> adds + or - one increment to the output.
>>>>
>>>> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
>>>> increment at a time.
>>>>
>>>> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
>>>> output.
>>>>
>>>> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
>>>> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
>>>> comparators.
>>>
>>> Yes,
>>> but you can get more linear varicap effect by using for example 2.
>>> This paper shows some topologies and their effect:
>>> https://www.everythingrf.com/uploads/whitepapers/IEEE_BCTM_092010_2.pdf
>>>
>>> Then use a linear opamp feedback loop?
>>>
>>> I am using something like fig 1b on page 3 for my 25 MHz PLL reference for Eshail2.
>>>
>> At a given frequency you can do a good job of linearizing a varactor by
>> using one inductor in series, resonated just off the high-capacitance
>> end, and one in parallel, resonated just off the low-capacitance end.
>
> Way to wreck the Q.
How so?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Reply by ●January 20, 20192019-01-20
On Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 5:47:51 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> On 1/5/19 2:12 PM, 698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org wrote:
> > John Larkin wrote
> >> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
> >> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
> >> TC.
> >>
> >> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
> >> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
> >> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
> >> coefficients.
> >>
> >>
> >> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
> >> interesting architecture.
> >>
> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
> >>
> >> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
> >> adds + or - one increment to the output.
> >>
> >> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
> >> increment at a time.
> >>
> >> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
> >> output.
> >>
> >> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
> >> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
> >> comparators.
> >
> > Yes,
> > but you can get more linear varicap effect by using for example 2.
> > This paper shows some topologies and their effect:
> > https://www.everythingrf.com/uploads/whitepapers/IEEE_BCTM_092010_2.pdf
> >
> > Then use a linear opamp feedback loop?
> >
> > I am using something like fig 1b on page 3 for my 25 MHz PLL reference for Eshail2.
> >
> At a given frequency you can do a good job of linearizing a varactor by
> using one inductor in series, resonated just off the high-capacitance
> end, and one in parallel, resonated just off the low-capacitance end.
Way to wreck the Q.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
> --
> Dr Philip C D Hobbs
> Principal Consultant
> ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
> Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
> Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
>
> http://electrooptical.net
> http://hobbs-eo.com
Do you have any other goodies like that, which you
have only published as a patent?
--
Thanks,
- Win
Reply by Joseph Gwinn●January 19, 20192019-01-19
On Jan 18, 2019, Phil Hobbs wrote
(in article<iYOdnU7D_bbmS9zBnZ2dnUU7-IfNnZ2d@supernews.com>):
> On 1/17/19 10:13 PM, Les Cargill wrote:
> > John Larkin wrote:
> > > We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
> > > varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
> > > TC.
> > >
> > > We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
> > > because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
> > > polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
> > > coefficients.
> > >
> > >
> > > This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
> > > interesting architecture.
> > >
> > > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1>
> > >
> > > It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
> > > adds + or - one increment to the output.
> > >
> > > As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
> > > increment at a time.
> > >
> > > The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
> > > output.
> > >
> > > The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
> > > interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
> > > comparators.
> >
> >
> > Just use a regular DAC and an LPF and set the knee above a frequency
> > that matters. The output will mostly be zero, anyway.
> >
> > It's temperature so it's already heavily integrated. You just don't want
> > too much process gain.
>
> You can't usefully lowpass filter 1/f noise. It's really a different
> regime, especially when you care about LF phase noise.
>
> Some years ago I was building stabilized lasers for geophysical
> applications (a downhole interferometric gravimeter). The basic idea is
> that you can measure the density of rock by measuring gravity at the
> surface (where the rock is pulling down) and then at depth, where some
> of the rock is now pulling up. It was also intended for reservoir
> management, where we'd leave one sensor at the bottom of the well and
> correlate its data with that at the surface. (There are important
> gravity variations due to barometric pressure, even.)
>
> The laser had to have an Allan variance below 10**-10 at 100000 seconds
> (about a day), so I locked a communications-type DFB laser to an
> air-spaced etalon made from optically-contacted Zerodur, which was
> itself temperature-controlled. (Optical contacting makes a hermetic
> seal, which gets rid of the drift due to air density.)
>
> The locking technique is one I invented almost 30 years ago: you sit
> halfway up an interference fringe, subtract the photocurrents from the
> transmitted and reflected beams, and servo at the null. That gets rid
> of the AM noise contribution. You have to attenuate the reflected beam
> a bit, because it's stronger than the transmitted beam due to cavity
> losses. As long as you're super paranoid about fringes due to unwanted
> surface reflections, it's a very very stable locking mechanism, and
> doesn't require super-high finesse etalons like Pound-Drever-Hall.
>
> Interestingly it turns out that if you adjust the attenuation so that
>
> dR/d omega + dT/d omega = 0
>
> at the same frequency where
>
> R-T = 0
>
> the out-of-band frequency noise decouples from the total amplitude
> measurement as well, so theoretically you can do intracavity
> measurements at the shot noise. (The loop suppresses the in-band noise.)
>
> Filtering was not a useful concept.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
You mentioned in a response to the above that you had not published anything
since your IBM tenure.
But did you describe this method in "Building Electro-Optical Systems: Making
it all Work"?
Joe Gwinn
Reply by Les Cargill●January 18, 20192019-01-18
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> On 1/17/19 10:13 PM, Les Cargill wrote:
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
>>> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
>>> TC.
>>>
>>> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
>>> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
>>> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
>>> coefficients.
>>>
>>>
>>> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
>>> interesting architecture.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
>>>
>>> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
>>> adds + or - one increment to the output.
>>>
>>> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
>>> increment at a time.
>>>
>>> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
>>> output.
>>>
>>> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
>>> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
>>> comparators.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Just use a regular DAC and an LPF and set the knee above a frequency
>> that matters. The output will mostly be zero, anyway.
>>
>> It's temperature so it's already heavily integrated. You just don't
>> want too much process gain.
>
> You can't usefully lowpass filter 1/f noise.
Wait, what? Is that a thing in TCXO's ? I meant the lowpass really as
just more integration - I do know you have to let these things get to
equilibrium before you can trust them.
> It's really a different
> regime, especially when you care about LF phase noise.
>
Sounds like it then.
> Some years ago I was building stabilized lasers for geophysical
> applications (a downhole interferometric gravimeter). The basic idea is
> that you can measure the density of rock by measuring gravity at the
> surface (where the rock is pulling down) and then at depth, where some
> of the rock is now pulling up. It was also intended for reservoir
> management, where we'd leave one sensor at the bottom of the well and
> correlate its data with that at the surface. (There are important
> gravity variations due to barometric pressure, even.)
>
> The laser had to have an Allan variance below 10**-10 at 100000 seconds
> (about a day), so I locked a communications-type DFB laser to an
> air-spaced etalon made from optically-contacted Zerodur, which was
> itself temperature-controlled. (Optical contacting makes a hermetic
> seal, which gets rid of the drift due to air density.)
>
> The locking technique is one I invented almost 30 years ago: you sit
> halfway up an interference fringe, subtract the photocurrents from the
> transmitted and reflected beams, and servo at the null. That gets rid
> of the AM noise contribution. You have to attenuate the reflected beam
> a bit, because it's stronger than the transmitted beam due to cavity
> losses. As long as you're super paranoid about fringes due to unwanted
> surface reflections, it's a very very stable locking mechanism, and
> doesn't require super-high finesse etalons like Pound-Drever-Hall.
>
> Interestingly it turns out that if you adjust the attenuation so that
>
> dR/d omega + dT/d omega = 0
>
> at the same frequency where
>
> R-T = 0
>
> the out-of-band frequency noise decouples from the total amplitude
> measurement as well, so theoretically you can do intracavity
> measurements at the shot noise. (The loop suppresses the in-band noise.)
>
That's crazy. Seems like it would also be a fine seismograph...
> Filtering was not a useful concept.
>
I would rather think not :) I thought we were talking about a
temperature controller.
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
--
Les Cargill
Reply by Phil Hobbs●January 18, 20192019-01-18
On 1/18/19 9:31 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote...
>>
>> Some years ago I was building stabilized lasers for geophysical
>> applications (a downhole interferometric gravimeter). [snip]
>
> Did you ever write that up?
>
>
Nah, I haven't published a paper since I left IBM. The technology
worked great, but the company went down the tubes (so to speak) when the
founder and main technical guy went off on the most spectacular midlife
crisis in my acquaintance--apparently he deserted his wife and five
children, then skipped off to China and shacked up with a 22-year-old
rich girl in Shanghai or someplace.
(February 22nd is the 10th anniversary of my consulting business--we're
going to throw a party.)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttp://hobbs-eo.com
Reply by Winfield Hill●January 18, 20192019-01-18
Phil Hobbs wrote...
>
> Some years ago I was building stabilized lasers for geophysical
> applications (a downhole interferometric gravimeter). [snip]
Did you ever write that up?
--
Thanks,
- Win
Reply by Phil Hobbs●January 18, 20192019-01-18
On 1/17/19 10:13 PM, Les Cargill wrote:
> John Larkin wrote:
>> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
>> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
>> TC.
>>
>> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
>> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
>> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
>> coefficients.
>>
>>
>> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
>> interesting architecture.
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
>>
>> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
>> adds + or - one increment to the output.
>>
>> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
>> increment at a time.
>>
>> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
>> output.
>>
>> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
>> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
>> comparators.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Just use a regular DAC and an LPF and set the knee above a frequency
> that matters. The output will mostly be zero, anyway.
>
> It's temperature so it's already heavily integrated. You just don't want
> too much process gain.
You can't usefully lowpass filter 1/f noise. It's really a different
regime, especially when you care about LF phase noise.
Some years ago I was building stabilized lasers for geophysical
applications (a downhole interferometric gravimeter). The basic idea is
that you can measure the density of rock by measuring gravity at the
surface (where the rock is pulling down) and then at depth, where some
of the rock is now pulling up. It was also intended for reservoir
management, where we'd leave one sensor at the bottom of the well and
correlate its data with that at the surface. (There are important
gravity variations due to barometric pressure, even.)
The laser had to have an Allan variance below 10**-10 at 100000 seconds
(about a day), so I locked a communications-type DFB laser to an
air-spaced etalon made from optically-contacted Zerodur, which was
itself temperature-controlled. (Optical contacting makes a hermetic
seal, which gets rid of the drift due to air density.)
The locking technique is one I invented almost 30 years ago: you sit
halfway up an interference fringe, subtract the photocurrents from the
transmitted and reflected beams, and servo at the null. That gets rid
of the AM noise contribution. You have to attenuate the reflected beam
a bit, because it's stronger than the transmitted beam due to cavity
losses. As long as you're super paranoid about fringes due to unwanted
surface reflections, it's a very very stable locking mechanism, and
doesn't require super-high finesse etalons like Pound-Drever-Hall.
Interestingly it turns out that if you adjust the attenuation so that
dR/d omega + dT/d omega = 0
at the same frequency where
R-T = 0
the out-of-band frequency noise decouples from the total amplitude
measurement as well, so theoretically you can do intracavity
measurements at the shot noise. (The loop suppresses the in-band noise.)
Filtering was not a useful concept.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttp://hobbs-eo.com
Reply by Les Cargill●January 17, 20192019-01-17
John Larkin wrote:
> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
> TC.
>
> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
> coefficients.
>
>
> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
> interesting architecture.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
>
> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
> adds + or - one increment to the output.
>
> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
> increment at a time.
>
> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
> output.
>
> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
> comparators.
>
>
>
Just use a regular DAC and an LPF and set the knee above a frequency
that matters. The output will mostly be zero, anyway.
It's temperature so it's already heavily integrated. You just don't want
too much process gain.
--
Les Cargill
Reply by Phil Hobbs●January 7, 20192019-01-07
On 1/5/19 2:47 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 19:12:25 GMT, <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org>
> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote
>>> We were talking about TCXOs. One measures temperature and drives a
>>> varicap through some nonlinear transfer function to get minumum net
>>> TC.
>>>
>>> We don't want a digital design (ADC, lookup table or polynomial, DAC)
>>> because that might add phase noise. I guess you could use a static
>>> polynomial with the equivalent of nonvolatile DPOTS as the
>>> coefficients.
>>>
>>>
>>> This occurred to me, not as anything practical maybe but as an
>>> interesting architecture.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ls632mndcxqby8/DAC_TCXO.JPG?raw=1
>>>
>>> It's sort of a thermometer-code ADC, but each comparator incrementally
>>> adds + or - one increment to the output.
>>>
>>> As the temperature increases, we jog the output up or down one
>>> increment at a time.
>>>
>>> The sequence of switch settings become a delta-sigma code to make the
>>> output.
>>>
>>> The comparators could be sort of linear, not step outputs, to kind of
>>> interpolate a bit. Some flash ADCs did something like that, soft
>>> comparators.
>>
>> Yes,
>> but you can get more linear varicap effect by using for example 2.
>> This paper shows some topologies and their effect:
>> https://www.everythingrf.com/uploads/whitepapers/IEEE_BCTM_092010_2.pdf
>>
>> Then use a linear opamp feedback loop?
>>
>> I am using something like fig 1b on page 3 for my 25 MHz PLL reference for Eshail2.
>
> A TCXO wouldn't need a very linear varactor, but a tight PLL does.
Doesn't have to be super duper linear, though +-10% is lots tight
enough, because all it does is change the loop gain a bit. You can do
that well with an inductor in series and one in parallel.
>
> I have a new circuit that starts a 600 MHz coaxial ceramic resonator
> colpitts oscillator at trigger time, and phase locks it to an OCXO
> asap, still preserving the phase of the oscillator relative to the
> trigger. It uses an ADC to digitize the phase difference, an FPGA to
> do the math, and a DAC+varicap to tweak the CCRO. It also uses a dual
> varicap per fig 1b in your paper. Driving the varicap junction is
> interesting. I designed the loop and can barely understand it myself.
>
> The TCXO thing I posted is interesting because it's delta-sigma in
> space instead of the usual delta-sigma in time.
>
>
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttps://hobbs-eo.com