Reply by Phil Hobbs March 23, 20152015-03-23
On 03/20/2015 07:04 PM, George Herold wrote:
> On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), George Herold >> <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> John Larkin wrote... >>>>> >>>>> High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal >>>>> films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. >>>> >>>> Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, >>>> proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like >>>> under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically >>>> from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise >>>> levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be >>>> replaced. >>>> >>>> But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at >>>> all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's >>>> talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. >>>> The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> - Win >>> >>> Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once >>> my piece of the 40 tons arrives. >>> I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface >>> thing. (could be the outer surface or some >>> layer underneath.) >>> >>> George H. >> >> All resistors have the same Johnson noise at zero volts. Some, not >> metal films, have shot noise with current flowing, which is simple >> electron arrival statistics. >> >> I conjecture that some nonmetallic resistors, like cermets, may have >> shot noise when biased. They also have excess, 1/f ish, noise, maybe >> from their polycrystaline confused nature. Tiny temperature variations >> must play heck with a grainy cermet-like structure. > > I've never seen excess shot noise in resistors.. > (excess noise that is white in frequency.) > but I haven't looked hard either. > According to Landauer a resistor should reduce the shot noise > as 1/N, where N is the number of scattering events > as a "single electron pulse" travels the length of the resistor. > > I'm not sure how to think about "scattering events" > and 10 ns pulses.
Cermets and high value carbon comp resistors rely on the spreading resistance of minute contacts between grains--IOW the effective length of the resistor is much shorter than its physical length. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
Reply by George Herold March 20, 20152015-03-20
On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 7:48:22 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > >> <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: > >> >> John Larkin wrote... > >> >> > > >> >> > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal > >> >> > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. > >> >> > >> >> Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, > >> >> proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like > >> >> under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically > >> >> from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise > >> >> levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be > >> >> replaced. > >> >> > >> >> But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at > >> >> all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's > >> >> talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. > >> >> The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> - Win > >> > > >> >Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once > >> >my piece of the 40 tons arrives. > >> >I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface > >> >thing. (could be the outer surface or some > >> >layer underneath.) > >> > > >> >George H. > >> > >> All resistors have the same Johnson noise at zero volts. Some, not > >> metal films, have shot noise with current flowing, which is simple > >> electron arrival statistics. > >> > >> I conjecture that some nonmetallic resistors, like cermets, may have > >> shot noise when biased. They also have excess, 1/f ish, noise, maybe > >> from their polycrystaline confused nature. Tiny temperature variations > >> must play heck with a grainy cermet-like structure. > > > >I've never seen excess shot noise in resistors.. > >(excess noise that is white in frequency.) > >but I haven't looked hard either. > >According to Landauer a resistor should reduce the shot noise > >as 1/N, where N is the number of scattering events > >as a "single electron pulse" travels the length of the resistor. > > > >I'm not sure how to think about "scattering events" > >and 10 ns pulses. > > 10 ns is still pretty slow.
Well just a number out of the air... well typical PMT pulse width, that's more than one electron of course.
> > > >> > >> I've done a little testing on high-ohm resistors, but just enough to > >> get me through a project. I needed 100 Mohms and wound up using two > >> Dale custom-ordered 50M axials in series in mid-air, hopping over some > >> surface-mount parts. Cermets were awful. This is fairly difficult > >> stuff to measure, but would be a good student project or something. > > > >I wired up my LTC6090 HV opamps today. Fired it up on the test bench. > >no smoke, but all I saw noise-wise, was first the room lights, and then > >60Hz, with cross-over spikies from the linear supply.... I wanted to > >go watch the UB bulls play in the "big dance".* So I'll have, > >to put it in the box tomorrow...(Monday) Measuring noise can be hard. > >I sometime wonder how I ever made things work in the past.... > > > >George H. > > > > *UB lost, we trailed the entire game, tied it up with ~3:00 to go, > >and then lost. Still it was a great emotional ride for me. > >+1, I hope Bobby Hurley stays and we go back. > >(intellectually sports makes no sense at all, > >for me, it's all about the emotion.) > > > > Was that basketball? I never understood that game. It seems to be a > bunch of guys with endocrine problems, running back and forth all > night. Looks chaotic to me.
Yeah, I played it a lot when younger, which helps.. Team sports are fun. I wish I still had good knees, I hate running, but running after some ball is different. (I'm trying to win!) Basketball, soccer, tennis, volleyball... I still play ping-pong, a pretty small ball, and not much running. George H.
> > > > > -- > > John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc > picosecond timing precision measurement > > jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com > http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply by John Larkin March 20, 20152015-03-20
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

>On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), George Herold >> <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote: >> >> >On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: >> >> John Larkin wrote... >> >> > >> >> > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal >> >> > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. >> >> >> >> Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, >> >> proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like >> >> under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically >> >> from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise >> >> levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be >> >> replaced. >> >> >> >> But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at >> >> all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's >> >> talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. >> >> The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Win >> > >> >Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once >> >my piece of the 40 tons arrives. >> >I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface >> >thing. (could be the outer surface or some >> >layer underneath.) >> > >> >George H. >> >> All resistors have the same Johnson noise at zero volts. Some, not >> metal films, have shot noise with current flowing, which is simple >> electron arrival statistics. >> >> I conjecture that some nonmetallic resistors, like cermets, may have >> shot noise when biased. They also have excess, 1/f ish, noise, maybe >> from their polycrystaline confused nature. Tiny temperature variations >> must play heck with a grainy cermet-like structure. > >I've never seen excess shot noise in resistors.. >(excess noise that is white in frequency.) >but I haven't looked hard either. >According to Landauer a resistor should reduce the shot noise >as 1/N, where N is the number of scattering events >as a "single electron pulse" travels the length of the resistor. > >I'm not sure how to think about "scattering events" >and 10 ns pulses.
10 ns is still pretty slow.
>> >> I've done a little testing on high-ohm resistors, but just enough to >> get me through a project. I needed 100 Mohms and wound up using two >> Dale custom-ordered 50M axials in series in mid-air, hopping over some >> surface-mount parts. Cermets were awful. This is fairly difficult >> stuff to measure, but would be a good student project or something. > >I wired up my LTC6090 HV opamps today. Fired it up on the test bench. >no smoke, but all I saw noise-wise, was first the room lights, and then >60Hz, with cross-over spikies from the linear supply.... I wanted to >go watch the UB bulls play in the "big dance".* So I'll have, >to put it in the box tomorrow...(Monday) Measuring noise can be hard. >I sometime wonder how I ever made things work in the past.... > >George H. > > *UB lost, we trailed the entire game, tied it up with ~3:00 to go, >and then lost. Still it was a great emotional ride for me. >+1, I hope Bobby Hurley stays and we go back. >(intellectually sports makes no sense at all, >for me, it's all about the emotion.) >
Was that basketball? I never understood that game. It seems to be a bunch of guys with endocrine problems, running back and forth all night. Looks chaotic to me. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply by George Herold March 20, 20152015-03-20
On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote: > > >On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: > >> John Larkin wrote... > >> > > >> > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal > >> > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. > >> > >> Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, > >> proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like > >> under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically > >> from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise > >> levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be > >> replaced. > >> > >> But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at > >> all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's > >> talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. > >> The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> - Win > > > >Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once > >my piece of the 40 tons arrives. > >I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface > >thing. (could be the outer surface or some > >layer underneath.) > > > >George H. > > All resistors have the same Johnson noise at zero volts. Some, not > metal films, have shot noise with current flowing, which is simple > electron arrival statistics. > > I conjecture that some nonmetallic resistors, like cermets, may have > shot noise when biased. They also have excess, 1/f ish, noise, maybe > from their polycrystaline confused nature. Tiny temperature variations > must play heck with a grainy cermet-like structure.
I've never seen excess shot noise in resistors.. (excess noise that is white in frequency.) but I haven't looked hard either. According to Landauer a resistor should reduce the shot noise as 1/N, where N is the number of scattering events as a "single electron pulse" travels the length of the resistor. I'm not sure how to think about "scattering events" and 10 ns pulses.
> > I've done a little testing on high-ohm resistors, but just enough to > get me through a project. I needed 100 Mohms and wound up using two > Dale custom-ordered 50M axials in series in mid-air, hopping over some > surface-mount parts. Cermets were awful. This is fairly difficult > stuff to measure, but would be a good student project or something.
I wired up my LTC6090 HV opamps today. Fired it up on the test bench. no smoke, but all I saw noise-wise, was first the room lights, and then 60Hz, with cross-over spikies from the linear supply.... I wanted to go watch the UB bulls play in the "big dance".* So I'll have, to put it in the box tomorrow...(Monday) Measuring noise can be hard. I sometime wonder how I ever made things work in the past.... George H. *UB lost, we trailed the entire game, tied it up with ~3:00 to go, and then lost. Still it was a great emotional ride for me. +1, I hope Bobby Hurley stays and we go back. (intellectually sports makes no sense at all, for me, it's all about the emotion.)
> > > -- > > John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc > picosecond timing precision measurement > > jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com > http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply by John Larkin March 20, 20152015-03-20
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: >> John Larkin wrote... >> > >> > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal >> > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. >> >> Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, >> proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like >> under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically >> from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise >> levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be >> replaced. >> >> But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at >> all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's >> talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. >> The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> - Win > >Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once >my piece of the 40 tons arrives. >I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface >thing. (could be the outer surface or some >layer underneath.) > >George H.
All resistors have the same Johnson noise at zero volts. Some, not metal films, have shot noise with current flowing, which is simple electron arrival statistics. I conjecture that some nonmetallic resistors, like cermets, may have shot noise when biased. They also have excess, 1/f ish, noise, maybe from their polycrystaline confused nature. Tiny temperature variations must play heck with a grainy cermet-like structure. I've done a little testing on high-ohm resistors, but just enough to get me through a project. I needed 100 Mohms and wound up using two Dale custom-ordered 50M axials in series in mid-air, hopping over some surface-mount parts. Cermets were awful. This is fairly difficult stuff to measure, but would be a good student project or something. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply by Jan Panteltje March 20, 20152015-03-20
On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT)) it happened George
Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote in
<4527cdae-051b-4973-94cc-0dc648fef4a1@googlegroups.com>:

>I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface >thing. (could be the outer surface or some >layer underneath.)
Yes, probably above some voltage you may get arcing over minuscule 'islands' of resisytro material.
Reply by George Herold March 19, 20152015-03-19
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote:
> John Larkin wrote... > > > > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal > > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter. > > Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, > proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like > under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically > from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise > levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be > replaced. > > But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at > all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's > talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. > The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. > > > -- > Thanks, > - Win
Excellent! I look forward to the discussion once my piece of the 40 tons arrives. I wonder if the voltage dependence is a surface thing. (could be the outer surface or some layer underneath.) George H.
Reply by Winfield Hill March 19, 20152015-03-19
John Larkin wrote...
> > High-value (like, 100M) thickfilms seem to have excess noise. Metal > films are hard to find at those values, but are much quieter.
Yes. The "excess noise" I've observed is usually highly voltage dependent, proportional to voltage, etc. It may be non-existent at low voltages, like under 10V, but severe above 50 to 100V to 1kV. And it can vary dramatically from part to part. E.e., made some +/-2KV amplifiers, with sub 1ppm noise levels, and 20% of the 10kV feedback resistors were very noisy and had to be replaced. But troublesome FET transistor noise may not have classic 1/f characteristics at all, e.g., "telegraph noise" and "popcorn noise" are not strictly 1/f. Let's talk after you've digested our measurements and the discussion in Chapter 8. The book is being shipped as we speak. My order is in. -- Thanks, - Win
Reply by Phil Hobbs March 19, 20152015-03-19
> But now you are making me think. &#4294967295;1E-7 V/V per decade, &#4294967295; >So with ten volts of bias and let's say a 1 Hz to 1 kHz bandwidth, >that would be 3E-6 V(rms)(?) and a noise density (at 1 kHz) of >~1E-7V/rtHz... that seems huge! (even it I did loose a factor >of pi in there somewhere.)
By my few measurements, the real number is at least 30 dB lower than that. Cheers Phil Hobbs
Reply by George Herold March 19, 20152015-03-19
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 2:06:35 PM UTC-4, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 12:30 PM, George Herold wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 11:10:45 PM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote: > >> George Herold wrote... > >>> > >>> Just the final update on apex opamps... > >>> (I'm still waiting on DK, but I had to leave early today.) > >>> It turns out that I'd forgotten the first apex update, > >>> where the PA141 went to the PA241... so here a noise plot > >>> (noise density is uncalibrated.. though I have the gain settings.) > >>> > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/1vguffiuj4noghz/Graph1.BMP?dl=0 > >>> (The black line has a slope of 1) > >>> > >>> Turns out the opamp got progressively worse... > >>> What's weird is that the "1/f" noise > >>> is not 1/f, but f^-2/3. > >>> > >>> Well since I don't understand 1/f, (1/f)^2/3 is no weirder. > >> > >> We discuss in detail how this can happen in our lengthy > >> Chapter 8 in Art of Electronics 3rd edition, 40 tons of > >> which is shipping now from the printer. It's largely > >> due to offset shifts (i.e., popcorn-noise style) as > >> well as large thermal offset-voltage drifts. > > > > Hi Win, I assume you are talking about 1/f noise ...(and not the 2/3rds power dependence.) I've read some stuff on 1/f. (Van-der-Ziel for one.) > > I guess the classic 1/f noise is from the old carbon comp. resistors. > > Here's a plot.... well it's a bit busy, I found a tiny hint of 1/f noise in (cheap, Xicon) metal film resistors. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/y1jv60eawkj9oxd/1_OVER_F.BMP?dl=0 > > > > George H. > >> > > IIRC most MF resistors are specified at 1E-7V/V per decade of frequency. > I measured some as a voltage divider with a 9V alkaline, battery, and > they were nowhere near that bad.
I don't really like that noise plot for the metal films... I did it a while ago. (Maybe I'll repeat it some day.) But now you are making me think. 1E-7 V/V per decade, So with ten volts of bias and let's say a 1 Hz to 1 kHz bandwidth, that would be 3E-6 V(rms)(?) and a noise density (at 1 kHz) of ~1E-7V/rtHz... that seems huge! (even it I did loose a factor of pi in there somewhere.) George H.
> > Cheers > > Phil Hobbs > > > -- > Dr Philip C D Hobbs > Principal Consultant > ElectroOptical Innovations LLC > Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics > > 160 North State Road #203 > Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 > > hobbs at electrooptical dot net > http://electrooptical.net