>
> krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Ah, I see, it's like the tax code then :-)
> >
> >
> > Have you tried lifting the tax code? ;-)
> >
>
> Wait! Joerg's in the world's strongest man contest??
No. He cheated. He picked it up on a stack of DVDs in plain text
files. :)
>
> Ed
--
You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid� on it, because it's
Teflon coated.
Reply by The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra●May 1, 20112011-05-01
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:20:45 -0500, John KD5YI <sophi.2@invalid.org>
wrote:
>On 4/29/2011 5:28 PM, John KD5YI wrote:
>> On 4/29/2011 1:22 AM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:48:04 -0500, John KD5YI<sophi.2@invalid.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2011 8:01 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:55:56 -0700, Joerg<invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What, you had that turning gray of probe pins happen, too?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, Remember I don't use Crapture, but can convert my schematics to
>>>>> Crapture upon request... without ever opening Crapture ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The word "crapture" has become trite, especially when used three times
>>>> in one sentence.
>>>>
>>>> Please, Jim, tell me you're not developing a feces fetish like your most
>>>> recent admirer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, fucktard, it is you that has mentioned it now six times
>>> minimum in the last 24 hrs.
>>
>> Prove it, Rat_Bastard. Otherwise, STFU.
>>
>>
>
>The subject was using the word "crapture" you wanking rat-bastard idiot.
Not by reading your post. YOU made the subject something else. By your
very own words, idiot.
>Thanks for proving my case.
Proving YOUR case!? HAHahahahahaha! You fucking retard! You only
proved that I was correct, and that it was you that has infected the
group with such discussion for the last few days.
I'd say that you are fairly obsessed with accusing others of your
affliction.
I am sure now, that you and the Larkin Retard bandwagon will shift the
criteria now.
Reply by Joerg●May 1, 20112011-05-01
UltimatePatriot wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:02:54 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> This probably explains the $400 difference, assuming you are filing
>> individual:
>>
>> http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204447,00.html
>>
>
>
> Then they altered my return for it, as I never filed a schedule M.
>
> Must be our workplace gov contractor status that auto-kicked it in.
It doesn't have much to do with your status, whether you are an employee
or contractor, or whether your employer caters to the government. AFAIK
it's given to anyone who had taxable income from work.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply by UltimatePatriot●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:02:54 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
Then they altered my return for it, as I never filed a schedule M.
Must be our workplace gov contractor status that auto-kicked it in.
Reply by Joerg●April 30, 20112011-04-30
UltimatePatriot wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:58:10 -0500, John Fields
> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:04:47 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>> <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Tax avoidance isn't illegal.
>> ---
>> Not only is it not illegal, its a moral imperative for all of us to
>> find ways to keep the federal government from taxing us into a
>> hand-to-mouth existence.
>>
>> Oops...
>>
>> Too late.
>>
>> Maybe it's time to feed the tree of liberty.
>>
>>
>
> I was to get about $800 back. That's what I filed too.
>
> They sent me $1200.
>
Oh, they won't err one penny in your favor but they sure don't question
an obvious error in their favor. The first year after HSA was introduced
the software of the tax pros was screwed up. So I overpaid quite a bit
because my CPA's system filed the medical costs as income. The IRS has
the respective 1099s and their computers could easily flag this. But
they didn't. Oh well. Maybe those Dollar prevent us all from going over
the cliff :-)
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply by UltimatePatriot●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:24:23 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:58:10 -0500, John Fields
><jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:04:47 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Tax avoidance isn't illegal.
>>
>>---
>>Not only is it not illegal, its a moral imperative for all of us to
>>find ways to keep the federal government from taxing us into a
>>hand-to-mouth existence.
>
>Voting the bums out is a good start.
>
>>Oops...
>>
>>Too late.
>>
>>Maybe it's time to feed the tree of liberty.
>
>That's still plan-B.
I found an old abse post
Thompson wants to feed them cyanide. I thought they might like a
little stimulation.
You fuckers could probably benefit as well.
quoted post:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:55:35 -0700, ItsASecretDummy wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:56:58 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
>>On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:21:55 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> Castrate all the politicians, I say, castrate all the politicians ;-)
>>
>>Nah, just replace all of the viagra, cialis, and other hardon pills with
>>cyanide. >:->
>
> Nope. a 2000 mcg dose of d-LSD-25 in a very pure form would really do
> a much better job.
>
> That way, we could watch as at least one of them decides to go
> "postal".
>
> Most, however, would actually learn something.
>
> Uhhh... maybe we should reduce that to 100 mcg since these would
> almost assuredly all be "first timers".
One time, I took a hit of "Chocolate Mesc" which I understand is just
LSD with a fancy name - after about an hour, I was a little disappointed
that it wasn't working too well, so I took two more.
I saw God. =:-O
Cheers!
Rich
Reply by UltimatePatriot●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:58:10 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:04:47 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>
>>Tax avoidance isn't illegal.
>
>---
>Not only is it not illegal, its a moral imperative for all of us to
>find ways to keep the federal government from taxing us into a
>hand-to-mouth existence.
>
>Oops...
>
>Too late.
>
>Maybe it's time to feed the tree of liberty.
>
>
I was to get about $800 back. That's what I filed too.
They sent me $1200.
I'm not saying anything.
Reply by krw...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:58:10 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:04:47 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>
>>Tax avoidance isn't illegal.
>
>---
>Not only is it not illegal, its a moral imperative for all of us to
>find ways to keep the federal government from taxing us into a
>hand-to-mouth existence.
Voting the bums out is a good start.
>Oops...
>
>Too late.
>
>Maybe it's time to feed the tree of liberty.
That's still plan-B.
Reply by krw...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:14:47 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:07:47 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:36:49 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:51:04 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:14:49 -0700, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can Cntl-uncheck wires before the move. Uncheck them in the segment
>>>>>>>>>> *before* the segment you don't want to "push". Also, only push in one
>>>>>>>>>> direction at a time. It's dumb but not as bad as you indicate. OTOH, bundle
>>>>>>>>>> (bus) operation is backwards. There, you want to select the segment. ...and
>>>>>>>>>> taps still get messed up no matter what you do.
>>>>>>>>> Ok, but why on earth do I have to uncheck wires when such behavior is
>>>>>>>>> never desired by anyone in his right mind?
>>>>>>>> Got me! It's not rational but it's a "rule" that's not all that onerous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, I see, it's like the tax code then :-)
>>>>>> Have you tried lifting the tax code? ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> No, but others have. Obviously people manage to lift stuff and nobody
>>>>> notices or it's even legit. There was this guy in our morning paper who
>>>>> said he made "only" $200k last year and somehow managed to (legally) pay
>>>>> a grand total of $2k in taxes. That's sick.
>>>> I don't know if it's the same person, but did you catch the analysis of his
>>>> return? Basically, it was a crock.
>>>>
>>> Are you sure? Got a link?
>>
>> Here it is (I needed the name):
>>
>> http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2011/04/27/it_tax_a_village/page/full/
>>
>
>Thanks. $45k in brokerage fees alone? He must be wealthy dude.
Quite. Inheretence and Wall St. money, IIRC. The super-rich don't mind
*income* taxes at all. They've made theirs and don't want competition.
>$46k charitable is a good thing though, very commendable. But yeah, that does
>shrink the AGI a lot. You are right, looks like he didn't find the magic
>legal tricks.
>
>>> I doubt he would have given his name to a
>>> journalist if it was all cooked up because the IRS reads newspapers,
>>> too. I think it was Eric Schoenberg or something like that.
>>
>> Tax avoidance isn't illegal. Why would he hide his name if his point was to
>> make news?
>
>
>Well, he didn't hide his name.
...and made the "news".
Reply by John Fields●April 30, 20112011-04-30
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:04:47 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>Tax avoidance isn't illegal.
---
Not only is it not illegal, its a moral imperative for all of us to
find ways to keep the federal government from taxing us into a
hand-to-mouth existence.
Oops...
Too late.
Maybe it's time to feed the tree of liberty.
--
JF