In a Le Sage system where light is just a state of a Le Sage particle the link between light and mechanics is obvious.
Also the quantization.
Yes I have read the paper.
Reply by Anthony William Sloman●September 4, 20232023-09-04
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 9:23:29 PM UTC+10, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Mon, 4 Sep 2023 11:03:39 +0100) it happened Martin Brown
> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in <ud4a1t$1d04r$1...@dont-email.me>:
> >This is an interesting new take on modelling quantum correlations by
> >analogous classical point mass distributions. It might eventually lead
> >to a better understanding of both but for now it is just a curiosity.
> >
> >
> >https://physicsworld.com/a/theorists-unearth-new-link-between-entanglement-and-classical-mechanics/
> >
> >The actual paper is not behind a paywall for once:
> >
> >https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033110
> In a Le Sage system where light is just a state of a Le Sage particle the link between light and mechanics is obvious.
Whats also obvious is that the Le Sage theory is a self-contradictory heap of rubbish.
> Also the quantization.
>
> Yes I have read the paper.
And understand it as imperfectly as you understand the Le Sage theory of gravitation.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply by Fred Bloggs●September 4, 20232023-09-04
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 6:03:49 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
Looks like all they did was stumble on a duality they can barely understand, and then magnified their confusion with more math modeling they don't comprehend.