There are 53 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 10.
Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web pages faster. Why can't Microsoft program this well? John
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:46:42 -0700, John Larkin <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >pages faster. >Why can't Microsoft program this well? Microsoft would be spending 99% of their effort on ways to disable the program for people they don't think have paid for it or have the right to use.
"John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:u...@4ax.com... > Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in > place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web > pages faster. > > Why can't Microsoft program this well? > > John > Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? Art
Artemus wrote: > "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message > news:u...@4ax.com... >> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >> pages faster. >> >> Why can't Microsoft program this well? >> >> John >> > > Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? > Art > What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever written in terms of crash frequency. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:21:54 -0700, Joerg <i...@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Artemus wrote: >> "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >> news:u...@4ax.com... >>> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >>> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >>> pages faster. >>> >>> Why can't Microsoft program this well? >>> >>> John >>> >> >> Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? >> Art >> > >What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when >Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever >written in terms of crash frequency. It's that special "Joerg version" ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Gourmet Puzzles: What part of the fish are the "sticks"? Likewise where are the chicken "fingers" located?
"Joerg" <i...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:7...@mid.individual.net... > Artemus wrote: > > "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message > > news:u...@4ax.com... > >> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in > >> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web > >> pages faster. > >> > >> Why can't Microsoft program this well? > >> > >> John > >> > > > > Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? > > Art > > > > What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when > Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever > written in terms of crash frequency. > > -- > Regards, Joerg > > http://www.analogconsultants.com/ > > "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. > Use another domain or send PM. The CPU usage goes to 100% for several seconds, FF is totally non-responsive to mouse/KB input, as is all other programs. Google "firefox cpu". It's a well known problem for which I've tried the known solutions to no effect. I agree with you about Acrobat Reader. It halts everything else when firing up inside of any browser, or outside. Art
Joerg wrote: > Artemus wrote: > >> "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in >> message >> news:u...@4ax.com... >> >>> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >>> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >>> pages faster. >>> >>> Why can't Microsoft program this well? >>> >>> John >>> >> >> Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? >> Art >> > > What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. Don't see much problems either. IMHO the more of the web browsers you have installed, the more unnecessary problems and holes in the security you have added by yourself. > What hogs and hangs is when > Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever > written in terms of crash frequency. Acrobat gets slower and more hungry with every new version. Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant http://www.abvolt.com
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:21:54 -0700, Joerg <i...@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Artemus wrote: >> "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >> news:u...@4ax.com... >>> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >>> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >>> pages faster. >>> >>> Why can't Microsoft program this well? >>> >>> John >>> >> >> Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? >> Art >> > >What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when >Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever >written in terms of crash frequency. Adobe may be the only major operation that programs worse than Microsoft. I use Foxit Reader (*not* as a browser plugin) to view pdf's, CutePDF (as a virtual printer) to make them. Both are solid and blinding fast. John
On Jul 1, 1:38=A0pm, "Artemus" <jnrgds...@invalid.org> wrote: > "Joerg" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message > > news:7...@mid.individual.net... > > > > > Artemus wrote: > > > "John Larkin" <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in m= essage > > >news:u...@4ax.com... > > >> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in > > >> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load we= b > > >> pages faster. > > > >> Why can't Microsoft program this well? > > > >> John > > > > Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? > > > Art > > > What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when > > Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever > > written in terms of crash frequency. > > > -- > > Regards, Joerg > > >http://www.analogconsultants.com/ > > > "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. > > Use another domain or send PM. > > The CPU usage goes to 100% for several seconds, FF is totally non-respons= ive > to mouse/KB input, as is all other programs. > Google "firefox cpu". =A0It's a well known problem for which I've tried t= he known > solutions to no effect. I'd call it fixed with the new release. > I agree with you about Acrobat Reader. =A0It halts everything else when f= iring up > inside of any browser, or outside. Dump Acrobat, Foxit is infinitely better on or offline: http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/ Mark L. Fergerson
John Larkin wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:21:54 -0700, Joerg <i...@invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> Artemus wrote: >>> "John Larkin" <j...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >>> news:u...@4ax.com... >>>> Downloaded and installed in about 90 seconds. Everything I had in >>>> place still works. Tab management is better, and it seems to load web >>>> pages faster. >>>> >>>> Why can't Microsoft program this well? >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>> Has the CPU hogging problem been fixed? >>> Art >>> >> What hogging? Mine needs short 4% bursts. What hogs and hangs is when >> Adobe Acrobat Reader fires up, IMHO one of the worst pieces of SW ever >> written in terms of crash frequency. > > Adobe may be the only major operation that programs worse than > Microsoft. > That may very well be true, although I used to believe that wasn't possible. > I use Foxit Reader (*not* as a browser plugin) to view pdf's, CutePDF > (as a virtual printer) to make them. Both are solid and blinding fast. > But I need to see PDFs right out of the browser and out of the email program. Store to disk and then view is impossible in my line of work. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.