Author: Bret CahillDate: 22:57 24-08-08
|
|
If you are saintly like me then the public record is your friend.
On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
record is your enemy.
Bret Cahill
|
|
|
|
Author: ZerkonXDate: 06:56 25-08-08
|
|
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:57:37 -0700, Bret Cahill wrote:
> If you are saintly like me
In writing about Gandhi, George Orwell said, "SAINTS should always be
judged guilty until they are proved innocent..."
http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays/gandhi.htm
|
|
|
|
Author: Bret CahillDate: 10:57 25-08-08
|
|
> > If you are saintly like me
> In writing about Gandhi, George Orwell said, "SAINTS should always be
> judged guilty until they are proved
innocent..."http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays/gandhi.htm
In that case I'm just acting within the law.
Bret Cahill
|
|
|
|
Author: Don StockbauerDate: 19:12 25-08-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John LarkinDate: 20:24 25-08-08
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:12:42 +0100, "Don Stockbauer"
<borg@aroundme.com> wrote:
>
>"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:4bbbd49c-633e-46b7-adb6-c506d1fa22b7@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> If you are saintly like me then the public record is your friend.
>>
>> On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
>> record is your enemy.
>>
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>>
>>
>>
>You're so right. Who could doubt any of what you say? Thanks for
>enlightening us.
Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
any, but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
John
|
|
|
|
Author: Bret CahillDate: 12:27 26-08-08
|
|
Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
crime . . .
> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
> any,
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
puppets. Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
a small child.
But if you actually send something to a tech magazine, for God's sake,
don't mention _my_ name.
> but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
anyone.
Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
Bret Cahill
|
|
|
|
Author: Bret CahillDate: 12:29 26-08-08
|
|
> > On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
> > record is your enemy.
> You're so right. =EF=BF=BDWho could doubt any of what you say? =EF=BF=BDT=
hanks for
> enlightening us.
"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
|
|
|
|
Author: John LarkinDate: 12:49 26-08-08
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:27:28 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
>Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
>crime . . .
>
>> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
>> any,
>
>You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
>puppets. Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
>a small child.
I don't need peer reviewers; I have customers.
>
>But if you actually send something to a tech magazine, for God's sake,
>don't mention _my_ name.
It never occurred to me.
John
|
|
|
|
Author: Bret CahillDate: 13:24 26-08-08
|
|
> but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
anyone.
Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
=2E.........
> >Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
> >crime . . .
> >> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
> >> any,
> >You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
> >puppets. =EF=BF=BD Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more=
than
> >a small child.
> I don't need peer reviewers;
Almost all who are active in industry will eventually end up
publishing _something_ as a byproduct of their work.
> I have customers.
Let me guess. There's no paper trail whatsoever.
Nothing in the public record either.
No patents, no nothing.
Tell your case worker the meds aren't working.
Bret Cahill
"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."
-- Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
Author: John LarkinDate: 22:42 26-08-08
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
>> but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
>
>The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
>anyone.
>
>Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
>
>..........
>
>> >Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
>> >crime . . .
>
>> >> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
>> >> any,
>
>> >You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
>> >puppets. ? Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
>> >a small child.
>
>> I don't need peer reviewers;
>
>Almost all who are active in industry will eventually end up
>publishing _something_ as a byproduct of their work.
Why? Writing code and manuals is plenty enough work.
What have you published?
>
>> I have customers.
>
>Let me guess. There's no paper trail whatsoever.
Checks are made of very nice paper.
>
>Nothing in the public record either.
>
>No patents, no nothing.
Again, why? It takes a lot of time and energy to get patents, and
that's just the down payment on the legal fees. I'd rather keep
designing new stuff to keep ahead of the curve... let people copy my
old stuff if they want to.
How many patents do you have? How successful have they been for you?
John
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael A. TerrellDate: 23:15 26-08-08
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
>
> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
|
|
|
|
Author: Rob DekkerDate: 17:18 27-08-08
|
|
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:YfydnfRusflDWynVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@earthlink.com...
>
> Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
>
>
> In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>
Michael,
I'm not speaking for Bret here, since he makes his own dicisions about what he writes,
and what he chooses to read,
but it seems to me that this sort of plain insulting posts does not add anything
positive to this NG.
So kind request : please refrain from remarks like this.
Thanks
Rob
>
> --
> http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
>
> aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
> listed, or I will not see your messages.
>
> If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
> your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
>
>
> There are two kinds of people on this earth:
> The crazy, and the insane.
> The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
> >> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
>
> > =EF=BF=BDIn that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>
> Michael,
>
> I'm not speaking for Bret here, since he makes his own dicisions about wh=
at he writes, and what he chooses to read,
> but it seems to me that this sort of plain insulting posts does not add a=
nything positive to this NG.
> So kind request : please refrain from remarks like this.
The sock puppeteer(s?) might make some money in the entirely reputable
field of science fiction novel writing. It's basically the same
thing except lots of characters instead of sock puppets and the
"creator" openly admits it's fiction.
But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
no matter _how_ many sock puppets are deployed.
Bret Cahill
|
|
|
|
Author: John FieldsDate: 06:57 29-08-08
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:04:57 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
>> >> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is
king."
>>
>> > ?In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
---
As you've learned recently, what with getting slapped around for
pretending to be an expert in electric tractors and thermodynamics
when you couldn't even figure out a simple heat sink problem.
Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
JF
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
> where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
> alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
Now now now. It's not my fault you made yourself look like an idiot.
Every time you try to cut snip something you have difficulty
accepting, I'll just reinsert it:
The sock puppeteer(s?) might make some money in the entirely reputable
field of science fiction novel writing. It's basically the same
thing except lots of characters instead of sock puppets and the
"creator" openly admits it's fiction.
But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
no matter _how_ many sock puppets are deployed.
Bret Cahill
"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."
-- Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
Author: John FieldsDate: 12:53 29-08-08
|
|
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:38:17 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
>> Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
>> where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
>> alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
>
>Now now now. It's not my fault you made yourself look like an idiot.
>
>Every time you try to cut snip something you have difficulty
>accepting, I'll just reinsert it:
---
I don't snip stuff because I have difficulty accepting it, I snip
because the material is irrelevant.
Go ahead and insert it as often as you like, it'll still be
irrelevant.
---
>"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."
>
>-- Nietzsche
---
"I am right about you, therefore you are vexed."
John Fields
|
|
|
|
Author: Rob DekkerDate: 16:34 29-08-08
|
|
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:60agb4965rpv7oau849a8skk64th3qmi7v@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:38:17 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
> wrote:
>
>>> Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
>>> where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
>>> alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
>>
>>Now now now. It's not my fault you made yourself look like an idiot.
>>
>>Every time you try to cut snip something you have difficulty
>>accepting, I'll just reinsert it:
>
> ---
> I don't snip stuff because I have difficulty accepting it, I snip
> because the material is irrelevant.
>
> Go ahead and insert it as often as you like, it'll still be
> irrelevant.
> ---
>
>
>>"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."
>>
>>-- Nietzsche
>
> ---
> "I am right about you, therefore you are vexed."
>
> John Fields
>
John, Bret,
You both posted many of this sort of threads between the two of you here on sci.energy.
I hope you understand that you are feeding each other with personal attacks and both of
you show no sign of letting go of previous
accusations, ad nauseam.
Overall, these threads are not so interesting for the rest of the NG readers.
So can one of the two of you be the wisest and stop replying to the 'group' when the
other posts something, ragardless of how much
you think the other is wrong ?
Post directly to the sender, or even better, don't post anything unless you are making a
scientific/technical comment about the
subject.
Not sure if it either one of you is wise enough to do so, but it should reduce the
amount of senseless postings here in sci.energy.
Thanks
Rob
|
|
|
|
1 |
