Author: billcalleyDate: 21:55 08-04-08
|
|
Hi All,
What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
versus one with a single-ended input? I know the noise immunity is
enhanced with differential, but is there also more sensitivity,
dynamic range, and/or IP3? If so, how much? Any other advantages for
having to put up with an added balun (for the receiver's single-ended
input filter)?
Thanks!
Bill
|
|
|
|
Author: JoergDate: 21:58 08-04-08
|
|
billcalley wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> versus one with a single-ended input? I know the noise immunity is
> enhanced with differential, but is there also more sensitivity,
> dynamic range, and/or IP3? If so, how much? Any other advantages for
> having to put up with an added balun (for the receiver's single-ended
> input filter)?
>
More dynamic range because the available amplitude doubles. Other than
that it's usually done for better noise immunity and less EMC issues.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 22:35 08-04-08
|
|
"billcalley"
>
> What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> versus one with a single-ended input?
** What sort of " receiver " are you on about?
Kindly supply a link to an example.
BTW
Please be more vague in future.
...... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: billcalleyDate: 23:07 08-04-08
|
|
On Apr 8, 7:35=A0pm, "Phil Allison" <philalli...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> "billcalley"
>
>
>
> > =A0 =A0What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> > versus one with a single-ended input?
>
> ** What sort of =A0" receiver " =A0are you on about?
>
> =A0 Kindly supply a link to an example.
>
> BTW
>
> Please be more vague in future.
>
> ...... =A0Phil
Sorry Phil, but I don't supply *anything* to poor, sad, lonely trolls.
-Bill
|
|
|
|
Author: EeyoreDate: 23:26 08-04-08
|
|
Joerg wrote:
> billcalley wrote:
> >
> > What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> > versus one with a single-ended input? I know the noise immunity is
> > enhanced with differential, but is there also more sensitivity,
> > dynamic range, and/or IP3? If so, how much? Any other advantages for
> > having to put up with an added balun (for the receiver's single-ended
> > input filter)?
>
> More dynamic range because the available amplitude doubles. Other than
> that it's usually done for better noise immunity and less EMC issues.
They have better immunity to crosstalk too as well as noise of course.
Graham
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 23:30 08-04-08
|
|
"billcalley = Shit For Brains Cunthead "
> > What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> > versus one with a single-ended input?
>
> ** What sort of " receiver " are you on about?
>
> Kindly supply a link to an example.
>
> BTW
>
> Please be more vague in future.
>
>
> Sorry Phil,
** Sorry is what you WILL be - you vile, ASD fucked puke.
> but I don't supply *anything* to poor, sad, lonely trolls.
** You would be supplying the whole NG with a bot on context - you
stupid , fucking asshole.
YOU are the attention seeking TROLL here !!
....... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: billcalleyDate: 01:02 09-04-08
|
|
On Apr 8, 6:55=A0pm, billcalley <billcal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> =A0 =A0 What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
> versus one with a single-ended input? =A0I know the noise immunity is
> enhanced with differential, but is there also more sensitivity,
> dynamic range, and/or IP3? =A0If so, how much? Any other advantages for
> having to put up with an added balun (for the receiver's single-ended
> input filter)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bill
Thanks Joerg and Eeyore -- differential circuits have always been a
bit of a mystery to me!
Best,
-Bill
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 01:26 09-04-08
|
|
"billcalley"
Thanks Joerg and Eeyore -- differential circuits have always been a
bit of a mystery to me!
** Everything in the whole damn universe is a mystery to this " calley "
pig.
..... Phil
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 9 apr, 07:26, "Phil Allison" <philalli...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> "billcalley"
>
> > Thanks Joerg and Eeyore -- differential circuits have always been a
> > bit of a mystery to me!
>
> ** Everything in the whole damn universe is a mystery to this " calley "
> pig.
It must be nice for Phil, knowing that he is so much cleverer than the
rest of the world.
I can't imagine how much nicer it would be for him if he could feel
himself more polite than the rest of the world in the same proportion,
mainly because my imagination isn't even up to the job of conceiving
Phil as ever being merely surly, as opposed to rabidly offensive.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 05:43 09-04-08
|
|
<bill.sloman@ieee.org>
** Sloman is one of the most EVIL and TWISTED persons posting on usenet.
An utterly narcissistic, profoundly autistic, vile Dutch fascist PIG !!
I sincerely hope an agonising death awaits him real soon.
Cos no-one deserves that more richly than he.
I puke on his grave.
...... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: Daniel MandicDate: 06:22 09-04-08
|
|
Phil Allison wrote:
> An utterly narcissistic, profoundly autistic, vile Dutch fascist PIG
> !!
>
> I sincerely hope an agonising death awaits him real soon.
If Americans would have had the class of Dutch in the last 200y
(because before 1800, they were deadly too, and deadly laws they had...
etc.), then the World would have seen the longest period of freedom
ever. ;-)
YOU Vietnam, you :-))))
Best regards,
Daniel Mandic
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 06:31 09-04-08
|
|
"Daniel Mandic"
** Total nutter .....
Or sock-puppet ?
..... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: EeyoreDate: 07:54 09-04-08
|
|
Daniel Mandic wrote:
> Phil Allison wrote:
>
> > An utterly narcissistic, profoundly autistic, vile Dutch fascist PIG
> > !!
> >
> > I sincerely hope an agonising death awaits him real soon.
>
> If Americans would have had the class of Dutch in the last 200y
> (because before 1800, they were deadly too, and deadly laws they had...
> etc.), then the World would have seen the longest period of freedom
> ever. ;-)
>
> YOU Vietnam, you :-))))
What would have happened in Indonesia though ?
Graham
|
|
|
|
Author: Terry GivenDate: 08:16 09-04-08
|
|
Phil Allison wrote:
> <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
>
>
> ** Sloman is one of the most EVIL and TWISTED persons posting on usenet.
>
> An utterly narcissistic, profoundly autistic, vile Dutch fascist PIG !!
>
> I sincerely hope an agonising death awaits him real soon.
>
> Cos no-one deserves that more richly than he.
>
> I puke on his grave.
>
>
>
> ...... Phil
Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
Cheers
Terry
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 08:21 09-04-08
|
|
"Terry Given"
> Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
** No he ain't.
The cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever find.
" Bill Sloman, Nijmegen "
..... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: Terry GivenDate: 08:37 09-04-08
|
|
Phil Allison wrote:
> "Terry Given"
>
>
>
>>Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
>
>
>
> ** No he ain't.
>
> The cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever find.
>
> " Bill Sloman, Nijmegen "
>
> ..... Phil
He lives there. but he's from australia. Just like you live in your
diseased imagination, but are also from australia :)
Cheers
Terry
|
|
|
|
Author: Phil AllisonDate: 08:42 09-04-08
|
|
> "Terry Given"
>
>>>Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
>>
>>
>> ** No he ain't.
>>
>> The cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever find.
>>
>> " Bill Sloman, Nijmegen "
>>
>
> He lives there. but he's from australia.
** So fucking what ?????????
There is not one tiny thing " Aussie " about him.
The vile, geriatric cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever
find.
...... Phil
|
|
|
|
Author: Terry GivenDate: 09:22 09-04-08
|
|
Phil Allison wrote:
>>"Terry Given"
>>
>>
>>>>Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
>>>
>>>
>>>** No he ain't.
>>>
>>> The cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever find.
>>>
>>>" Bill Sloman, Nijmegen "
>>>
>>
>>He lives there. but he's from australia.
>
>
>
> ** So fucking what ?????????
>
> There is not one tiny thing " Aussie " about him.
>
> The vile, geriatric cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever
> find.
>
> ...... Phil
Oh, my bad, I forgot that facts are not really a part of your universe.
Cheers
Terry
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 9 apr, 14:42, "Phil Allison" <philalli...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> > "Terry Given"
>
> >>>Hey Phil, you do know Bill is an ocker, right?
>
> >> ** No he ain't.
>
> >> =A0The cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever find.
>
> >> " Bill Sloman, Nijmegen "
>
> > He lives there. but he's from australia.
>
> ** =A0So fucking what =A0?????????
>
> There is not one tiny thing " Aussie " about him.
Apart from my passport, my Ph.D. from Melbourne University, my eight
nieces and nephews, four grand-nieces and nephews ...
> The vile, geriatric cunt is as big a Dutch, fascist PIG as you will ever
> find.
Granting Phil's search skills. he probably couldn't find a closer
approximation if he was shaking hands with Gert Wilders (though I am
taller than Gert Wilders). Others could certainly do better.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
|
|
|
|
Author: qrkDate: 14:24 09-04-08
|
|
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:55:48 -0700 (PDT), billcalley
<billcalley@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> What are the advantages of a receiver with a differential input
>versus one with a single-ended input? I know the noise immunity is
>enhanced with differential, but is there also more sensitivity,
>dynamic range, and/or IP3? If so, how much? Any other advantages for
>having to put up with an added balun (for the receiver's single-ended
>input filter)?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Bill
In digital junk, differential has better signal fidelity. No ground
bounce issues.
---
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
