 |
Search Sci.Electronics.Basics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Sci.Electronics.Basics -> what enclosure to use ?
There are 4 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 1 to 4.
|
Author: ArchimedesDate: 00:10 14-03-08
|
|
Hi All
I built a super-regen radio and want to enclose this in a box of some
sort. I have two options -
1. Plastic box
2. Aluminium Box
Now I want to listen to this radio when I am sitting next to my
computer. I know that the best option is to use the aluminium box as
it provides the best sheilding. However I dont understand how that
will help, when the antenna will be protruding out of the box and
therefore the radiation from the computer will be picked up from the
antenna regardless of which box I use. Is this a correct assumption ?
so should i just stick to plastic box ?
Thanks
Shelton.
|
|
|
|
Author: Bob MastaDate: 10:20 14-03-08
|
|
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:10:30 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes
<shelton.dcruz@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi All
>
>I built a super-regen radio and want to enclose this in a box of some
>sort. I have two options -
>
>1. Plastic box
>2. Aluminium Box
>
>Now I want to listen to this radio when I am sitting next to my
>computer. I know that the best option is to use the aluminium box as
>it provides the best sheilding. However I dont understand how that
>will help, when the antenna will be protruding out of the box and
>therefore the radiation from the computer will be picked up from the
>antenna regardless of which box I use. Is this a correct assumption ?
>so should i just stick to plastic box ?
>
>Thanks
>Shelton.
This is pretty easy to test before you build. The plastic case is
about the same as nothing for RF, so just place your naked radio
where you want it to be and see what happens. If that's
acceptable, go with plastic. If not, and you want to see if aluminum
would make any difference, try this trick: Put the naked circuit in
a cardboard box that is about the size of the alumimun box
you are considering. Then wrap the carboard with aluminum foil,
making sure you have crimped all seams to get good contact.
Use an alligator clip or even a screw and nut to connect to this
any ground you want to test,
Best regards,
Bob Masta
DAQARTA v3.50
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, FREE Signal Generator
Science with your sound card!
|
|
|
|
Author: GeorgeDate: 10:45 14-03-08
|
|
Bob Masta says...
> This is pretty easy to test before you build. The
> plastic case is about the same as nothing for RF, so
> just place your naked radio where you want it to be and
> see what happens. If that's acceptable, go with
> plastic. If not, and you want to see if aluminum would
> make any difference, try this trick: Put the naked
> circuit in a cardboard box that is about the size of the
> alumimun box you are considering. Then wrap the
> carboard with aluminum foil, making sure you have
> crimped all seams to get good contact. Use an alligator
> clip or even a screw and nut to connect to this any
> ground you want to test,
I read somewhere that magnetic metals (i.e. - ferrous) are
much more effective in shielding from RF, and
electro-magnetic interference in general, than non-magnetic
metals like aluminum and copper. But not having been
formally educated in this stuff, I'm having trouble coming
up with an explanation for why that might be true. Can you
shed light on this?
|
|
|
|
Author: John PopelishDate: 11:00 14-03-08
|
|
George wrote:
> I read somewhere that magnetic metals (i.e. - ferrous) are
> much more effective in shielding from RF, and
> electro-magnetic interference in general, than non-magnetic
> metals like aluminum and copper. But not having been
> formally educated in this stuff, I'm having trouble coming
> up with an explanation for why that might be true. Can you
> shed light on this?
To be a good shield, the material has to be several skin
depths thick at the frequency being shielded. High
conductivity thins the skin depth, but so does high
permeability. So if the ferrous metal has a permeability
(at the frequency in question) that more than offsets its
higher resistivity, then it will need less thickness to
provide the same shielding.
http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/EddyCurrents/Physics/depthcurr
entdensity.htm
--
Regards,
John Popelish
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Contact | Electronic Portal
|
|
|
