Sci.Electronics.Basics

on Electronics-Related.com

  Home  |  Books  |  Sci.Electronics.Design  |  Sci.Electronics.Basics  |  Resources  |  Contact  | 
Sign in
username:

password:

Remember Me

Not a member?
Search Sci.Electronics.Basics

Search Tips

Sci.Electronics.Basics -> Switch terminology?

There are 24 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 1 to 20.






Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 15:38 15-03-07


Maybe I don't understand switch terminology, but I thought SPST means single
throw (2 positions, ie. on-off) and SPDT means double-throw (3 positions, ie.
on-off-on).

This catalog page show many switches with both terms, but mixing xST with 2-
and 3-positions. Same with xDT term.

<http://tinyurl.com/36petb>;

Is my understanding incorrect? Or is this page all screwed up?

FBt


Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 15:46 15-03-07

BTW, I'm looking for a switch that has 3 pairs of terminals and 3 positions.
Each position connects a pair of terminals together. Rocker preferred.

FBt




Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 15:48 15-03-07

No momentary contacts.

FBt


Author: Lord Garth
Date: 16:09 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21EEEAB0005FB58F01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> Maybe I don't understand switch terminology, but I thought SPST means
single
> throw (2 positions, ie. on-off) and SPDT means double-throw (3 positions,
ie.
> on-off-on).
>
> This catalog page show many switches with both terms, but mixing xST with
2-
> and 3-positions. Same with xDT term.
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/36petb>;
>
> Is my understanding incorrect? Or is this page all screwed up?
>
> FBt

You're partially correct re SPDT excepting that if it has a center off
position,
the switch would be labeled as such. Example: Single Pole Double Throw
center off.

The poles are the armature or internal moving portion and a throw is the
non-moving contactor that receive a pole.



Author: Lord Garth
Date: 16:27 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21EF09000066D0AF01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> BTW, I'm looking for a switch that has 3 pairs of terminals and 3
positions.
> Each position connects a pair of terminals together. Rocker preferred.
>
> FBt

You're going to have to be clearer here, 3 pairs of terminals means 6
terminals.
The assumption being that your signal goes into one terminal and out the
other.

You say you wish to connect pairs of terminals together so your 3 throws
would
connect terminal 1&2 then 3&4 and finally 5&6 for example.

If that is what you desire, a double pole triple throw rotary switch would
work if
you short the two poles together. Rocker switches have only two positions
plus maybe a center off so that would not be a reasonable choice.

Another possibility is that you want two signals (stereo audio perhaps) to
go to
one of 3 destinations. A rotary switch would connect the poles to throw 1
or 2
or 3 for both the left and right signals. This would still be a double pole
triple
throw rotary switch but the poles would not be shorted together.





Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 16:37 15-03-07

> The poles are the armature or internal moving portion and a throw is the
> non-moving contactor that receive a pole.

So the term "throw" has nothing to do with the positions, or "stops"
that you
go through when moving the actuator (handle)?

FBt


Author: Homer J Simpson
Date: 16:39 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21EEEAB0005FB58F01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...

> Maybe I don't understand switch terminology, but I thought SPST means
> single
> throw (2 positions, ie. on-off) and SPDT means double-throw (3 positions,
> ie.
> on-off-on).

No, ON---ON.

It's quite possible to have a SPDT switch with no center position - some
microswitches and other sna switches are like that.

You are describing SPDT center off.






Author: Lord Garth
Date: 16:39 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21EFC8E00093CAAF04886C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> > The poles are the armature or internal moving portion and a throw is the
> > non-moving contactor that receive a pole.
>
> So the term "throw" has nothing to do with the positions, or
"stops" that
you
> go through when moving the actuator (handle)?
>
> FBt
>

The throw has only to do with the number of positions where the pole can
complete a circuit. The off positions are not counted.



Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 16:40 15-03-07

> If that is what you desire, a double pole triple throw rotary switch would
> work if you short the two poles together. Rocker switches have only
> two positions plus maybe a center off so that would not be a reasonable
> choice.

If rockers can have 3 positions:
on off on

why not:
on on on

each "on" shorting one pair of contacts.

I'm sure I've seen these before... just can't find one now.


Author: Lord Garth
Date: 16:41 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21EFD5600096B8EF04886C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> > If that is what you desire, a double pole triple throw rotary switch
would
> > work if you short the two poles together. Rocker switches have only
> > two positions plus maybe a center off so that would not be a reasonable
> > choice.
>
> If rockers can have 3 positions:
> on off on
>
> why not:
> on on on
>
> each "on" shorting one pair of contacts.
>
> I'm sure I've seen these before... just can't find one now.

That would be a rotary switch turned on its side!



Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 16:56 15-03-07

> You are describing SPDT center off.

If I want:
on - on - on

double-pole with 3 stops, what switch am I describing now?

2P3T?


Author: Lord Garth
Date: 16:58 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21F0100000A4753F04886C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> > You are describing SPDT center off.
>
> If I want:
> on - on - on
>
> double-pole with 3 stops, what switch am I describing now?
>
> 2P3T?

Correct...this is most easily done with a rotary switch. Each pole
is a separate wafer attached axially to the shaft.

What is it you are trying to design? Maybe we can suggest some
all electronic ways to switch the signals.




Author: Eeyore
Date: 17:58 15-03-07



Esther & Fester Bestertester wrote:

> > If that is what you desire, a double pole triple throw rotary switch would
> > work if you short the two poles together. Rocker switches have only
> > two positions plus maybe a center off so that would not be a reasonable
> > choice.
>
> If rockers can have 3 positions:
> on off on
>
> why not:
> on on on
>
> each "on" shorting one pair of contacts.
>
> I'm sure I've seen these before... just can't find one now.

They're fabulously rare. Old style telephone swiches used to be able to do that.
Check out http://www.switchcraft.com/

Graham





Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 19:47 15-03-07

> What is it you are trying to design? Maybe we can suggest some
> all electronic ways to switch the signals.

Small DC motor speed control. Switching resistors or diodes or...? to provide
several speed choices.

12v motor pulls 2-4 amps.

Suggestions?

Thanks,
FBt


Author: Lord Garth
Date: 20:15 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21F291D0013AE32F01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> > What is it you are trying to design? Maybe we can suggest some
> > all electronic ways to switch the signals.
>
> Small DC motor speed control. Switching resistors or diodes or...? to
provide
> several speed choices.
>
> 12v motor pulls 2-4 amps.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> FBt

You'll need a pulse width modulator to control the motor speed yet maintain
good
torque. There are ways to create such a modulator with an LM555 timer IC.
You
use it output to control a power FET.

FDB603AL is such a FET and I found this one on an otherwise dead
motherboard.
It is rated to handle 33A at 30V with a Vgs of 4.5 volts and having a
Rds(on) of .036 ohms
http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets/fairchild/FDB603AL.pdf

I'll drop copy of a modulator that ran in Electronics Design onto
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

it's a Word doc...




Author: Homer J Simpson
Date: 20:55 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21F0100000A4753F04886C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
>> You are describing SPDT center off.
>
> If I want:
> on - on - on
>
> double-pole with 3 stops, what switch am I describing now?
>
> 2P3T?

Yes.





Author: Homer J Simpson
Date: 20:55 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21F291D0013AE32F01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...

> Small DC motor speed control. Switching resistors or diodes or...? to
> provide
> several speed choices.
>
> 12v motor pulls 2-4 amps.
>
> Suggestions?

What sort of load? If your budget permits, a KB controller is a good choice.

http://www.kbelectronics.com/

Battery DC to DC: KBBC-24M 12/24 VDC, thru 40 Amps Continuous




Author: Phil Allison
Date: 20:59 15-03-07


"Esther & Fester Bestertester"
>
> Maybe I don't understand switch terminology, but I thought SPST means
> single
> throw (2 positions, ie. on-off) and SPDT means double-throw (3 positions,
> ie.
> on-off-on).

** Nope.

SPDT = single pole, change over

3 pos switches are specified as such.




........ Phil



Author: ehsjr
Date: 23:46 15-03-07

Esther & Fester Bestertester wrote:
>>What is it you are trying to design? Maybe we can suggest some
>>all electronic ways to switch the signals.
>
>
> Small DC motor speed control. Switching resistors or diodes or...? to provide
> several speed choices.
>
> 12v motor pulls 2-4 amps.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> FBt
>

One SPDT center off switch. Conceptually:

V+ ---+---[R1]---+---[R2]---+----+
| | | |
| o | |
+--------o-> | [Motor]
o----------+ |
|
Gnd -----------------------------+

Full speed with switch down, slow speed with switch
off, medium speed with switch up.

Realisticly, using resistors has problems. Reduces
torque, and they need to dissipate a *lot* of heat
at 4 amps (I^2R). Instead, use PWM - and then you
can use a pot and get the widest possible range of
speed available, avoid the heat problem, and have
better torque.

If you absolutely cannot use a pot, then you can
still get 3 speeds using the scheme above with
PWM where the resistors select the pulse width.
They won't get hot that way and can be much smaller
wattage.

Ed

Author: Esther & Fester Bestertester
Date: 04:20 16-03-07

> You'll need a pulse width modulator to control the motor speed yet maintain
> good torque. There are ways to create such a modulator with an LM555
> timer IC. You use it output to control a power FET.
>
> FDB603AL is such a FET and I found this one on an otherwise dead
> motherboard. It is rated to handle 33A at 30V with a Vgs of 4.5 volts
> and having a Rds(on) of .036 ohms
> http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets/fairchild/FDB603AL.pdf

Pretty nice specs for a $1 part, especially the Rds(on). What did it power on
the moboard?

> I'll drop copy of a modulator that ran in Electronics Design onto
> alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

Thanks. Without doing all the math, what R & C values would you recommend?

I found a near-identical circuit here:

http://www.discovercircuits.com/PDF-FILES/SIMPLEPWM2.pdf

Any idea what function the diodes connecting to the pwm adjustment pot
perform?

Thanks again.

FBt


1 2


      Contact  |  Electronic Portal


Sci.Electronics.Basics by Keywords
ADC
Antenna
CAD
Coil
Generator
IDE
LCD
Modulator
MOSFET
NiMH
Opamp
Oscilloscope
PID
RS232
Telephone
Transformers
TTL
USB

Sci.Electronics.Basics By Author